Issue

Vol. 17 (2025)

Durable Acidic Oxygen Evolution Via Self-Construction of Iridium Oxide/Iridium-Tantalum Oxide Bi-Layer Nanostructure with Dynamic Replenishment of Active Sites

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-025-01680-w
Qi Guo
Institute of Clean Energy, Yangtze River Delta Research Institute, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, People’s Republic of China
Rui Li
Institute of Clean Energy, Yangtze River Delta Research Institute, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, People’s Republic of China
Yanan Zhang
Institute of Clean Energy, Yangtze River Delta Research Institute, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, People’s Republic of China
Qiqin Zhang
Institute of Clean Energy, Yangtze River Delta Research Institute, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, People’s Republic of China
Yi He
Institute of Clean Energy, Yangtze River Delta Research Institute, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi’an 710072, People’s Republic of China
Zhibin Li
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Materials Genome Engineering, State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, People’s Republic of China
Weihong Liu
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology Shenzhen, Shenzhen 518055, People’s Republic of China
Xiongjun Liu
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Materials Genome Engineering, State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, People’s Republic of China
Zhaoping Lu
Beijing Advanced Innovation Center for Materials Genome Engineering, State Key Laboratory for Advanced Metals and Materials, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, People’s Republic of China

Corresponding Author: Zhaoping Lu

luzp@ustb.edu.cn

Nano-Micro Letters, Vol. 17 (2025), Article Number: 165

Abstract

Proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolysis presents considerable advantages in green hydrogen production. Nevertheless, oxygen evolution reaction (OER) catalysts in PEM water electrolysis currently encounter several pressing challenges, including high noble metal loading, low mass activity, and inadequate durability, which impede their practical application and commercialization. Here we report a self-constructed layered catalyst for acidic OER by directly using an Ir–Ta-based metallic glass as the matrix, featuring a nanoporous IrO2 surface formed in situ on the amorphous IrTaOx nanostructure during OER. This distinctive architecture significantly enhances the accessibility and utilization of Ir, achieving a high mass activity of 1.06 A mgIr−1 at a 300 mV overpotential, 13.6 and 31.2 times greater than commercial Ir/C and IrO2, respectively. The catalyst also exhibits superb stability under industrial-relevant current densities in acid, indicating its potential for practical uses. Our analyses reveal that the coordinated nature of the surface-active Ir species is effectively modulated through electronic interaction between Ir and Ta, preventing them from rapidly evolving into high valence states and suppressing the lattice oxygen participation. Furthermore, the underlying IrTaOx dynamically replenishes the depletion of surface-active sites through inward crystallization and selective dissolution, thereby ensuring the catalyst’s long-term durability.


Highlights:
1 A self-constructed catalyst with in situ formed IrO2/IrTaOx bi-layer nanostructure was fabricated for high-efficiency acidic oxygen evolution reaction by using an Ir–Ta-based metallic glass as the matrix.
2 The coordinated nature of the catalyst’s active site is manipulated through electronic interaction between Ir and Ta, resulting in superior activity and stability.
3 The underlying amorphous IrTaOx layer dynamically replenishes the depletion of surface Ir sites through inward crystallization and selective dissolution to ensure long-term durability.

Keywords

Self-construction Nanoporous Electronic interaction Replenishment Proton exchange membrane (PEM) water electrolysis
Guo, Qi, Rui Li, Yanan Zhang, Qiqin Zhang, Yi He, Zhibin Li, Weihong Liu, Xiongjun Liu, and Zhaoping Lu. 2025. “Durable Acidic Oxygen Evolution Via Self-Construction of Iridium Oxide/Iridium-Tantalum Oxide Bi-Layer Nanostructure With Dynamic Replenishment of Active Sites”. Nano-Micro Letters 17 (February):165. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-025-01680-w.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. J.A. Turner, Sustainable hydrogen production. Science 305, 972–974 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1103197
  2. S. Chu, A. Majumdar, Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature 488, 294–303 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11475
  3. M. Carmo, G.P. Keeley, D. Holtz, T. Grube, M. Robinius et al., PEM water electrolysis: innovative approaches towards catalyst separation, recovery and recycling. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 44, 3450–3455 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2018.12.030
  4. S.Z. Oener, M.J. Foster, S.W. Boettcher, Accelerating water dissociation in bipolar membranes and for electrocatalysis. Science 369, 1099–1103 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaz1487
  5. R. Haider, Y. Wen, Z.-F. Ma, D.P. Wilkinson, L. Zhang et al., High temperature proton exchange membrane fuel cells: progress in advanced materials and key technologies. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 1138–1187 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/D0CS00296H
  6. K. Jiao, J. Xuan, Q. Du, Z. Bao, B. Xie et al., Designing the next generation of proton-exchange membrane fuel cells. Nature 595, 361–369 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03482-7
  7. X. Li, L. Zhao, J. Yu, X. Liu, X. Zhang et al., Water splitting: from electrode to green energy system. Nano-Micro Lett. 12, 131 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-020-00469-3
  8. H. Jin, B. Ruqia, Y. Park, H.J. Kim, H.-S. Oh et al., Nanocatalyst design for long-term operation of proton/anion exchange membrane water electrolysis. Adv. Energy Mater. 11, 2003188 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202003188
  9. H. Wang, Z.-N. Chen, D. Wu, M. Cao, F. Sun et al., Significantly enhanced overall water splitting performance by partial oxidation of Ir through Au modification in core-shell alloy structure. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 4639–4645 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c12740
  10. F. Xiao, Y.-C. Wang, Z.-P. Wu, G. Chen, F. Yang et al., Recent advances in electrocatalysts for proton exchange membrane fuel cells and alkaline membrane fuel cells. Adv. Mater. 33, 2006292 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202006292
  11. L. Li, P. Wang, Q. Shao, X. Huang, Recent progress in advanced electrocatalyst design for acidic oxygen evolution reaction. Adv. Mater. 33, e2004243 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202004243
  12. F.-Y. Chen, Z.-Y. Wu, Z. Adler, H. Wang, Stability challenges of electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction: from mechanistic understanding to reactor design. Joule 5, 1704–1731 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.005
  13. C. Spöri, J.T.H. Kwan, A. Bonakdarpour, D.P. Wilkinson, P. Strasser, The stability challenges of oxygen evolving catalysts: towards a common fundamental understanding and mitigation of catalyst degradation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56, 5994–6021 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201608601
  14. R. Qin, G. Chen, X. Feng, J. Weng, Y. Han, Ru/Ir-based electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction in acidic conditions: from mechanisms, optimizations to challenges. Adv. Sci. 11, e2309364 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202309364
  15. A. Lončar, D. Escalera-López, S. Cherevko, N. Hodnik, Inter-relationships between oxygen evolution and iridium dissolution mechanisms. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202114437 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202114437
  16. L.C. Seitz, C.F. Dickens, K. Nishio, Y. Hikita, J. Montoya et al., A highly active and stable IrOx/SrIrO3 catalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction. Science 353, 1011–1014 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf5050
  17. R. Li, H. Wang, F. Hu, K.C. Chan, X. Liu et al., IrW nanochannel support enabling ultrastable electrocatalytic oxygen evolution at 2 A cm-2 in acidic media. Nat. Commun. 12, 3540 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-23907-1
  18. J. Zhang, X. Fu, F. Xia, W. Zhang, D. Ma et al., Core-shell nanostructured Ru@Ir-O electrocatalysts for superb oxygen evolution in acid. Small 18, e2108031 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202108031
  19. Y. Chen, H. Li, J. Wang, Y. Du, S. Xi et al., Exceptionally active iridium evolved from a pseudo-cubic perovskite for oxygen evolution in acid. Nat. Commun. 10, 572 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-08532-3
  20. W.H. Lee, J. Yi, H.N. Nong, P. Strasser, K.H. Chae et al., Electroactivation-induced IrNi nanops under different pH conditions for neutral water oxidation. Nanoscale 12, 14903–14910 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0nr02951c
  21. L. Fu, X. Zeng, G. Cheng, W. Luo, IrCo nanodendrite as an efficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting under acidic conditions. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 24993–24998 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b08717
  22. L. An, C. Wei, M. Lu, H. Liu, Y. Chen et al., Recent development of oxygen evolution electrocatalysts in acidic environment. Adv. Mater. 33, 2006328 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202006328
  23. Y.-R. Zheng, J. Vernieres, Z. Wang, K. Zhang, D. Hochfilzer et al., Monitoring oxygen production on mass-selected iridium–tantalum oxide electrocatalysts. Nat. Energy 7, 55–64 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00948-w
  24. S. Hao, H. Sheng, M. Liu, J. Huang, G. Zheng et al., Torsion strained iridium oxide for efficient acidic water oxidation in proton exchange membrane electrolyzers. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16, 1371–1377 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-00986-1
  25. Z. Lu, C. Wei, X. Liu, Y. Fang, X. Hao et al., Regulating the adsorption behavior of intermediates on Ir–W@Ir–WO3–x boosts acidic water oxidation electrocatalysis. Mater. Chem. Front. 5, 6092–6100 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1qm00551k
  26. Z. Shi, J. Li, J. Jiang, Y. Wang, X. Wang et al., Enhanced acidic water oxidation by dynamic migration of oxygen species at the Ir/Nb2O5–x catalyst/support interfaces. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61, e202212341 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202212341
  27. A.A.H. Tajuddin, M. Wakisaka, T. Ohto, Y. Yu, H. Fukushima et al., Corrosion-resistant and high-entropic non-noble-metal electrodes for oxygen evolution in acidic media. Adv. Mater. 35, e2207466 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202207466
  28. H. Zhu, Z. Zhu, J. Hao, S. Sun, S. Lu et al., High-entropy alloy stabilized active Ir for highly efficient acidic oxygen evolution. Chem. Eng. J. 431, 133251 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.133251
  29. S. Niu, Z. Yang, F. Qi, Y. Han, Z. Shi et al., Electrical discharge induced bulk-to-nanop transformation: nano high-entropy carbide as catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2203787 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202203787
  30. O. Kasian, J.-P. Grote, S. Geiger, S. Cherevko, K.J.J. Mayrhofer, The common intermediates of oxygen evolution and dissolution reactions during water electrolysis on iridium. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 57, 2488–2491 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201709652
  31. Y.T. Kim, P.P. Lopes, S.A. Park, A.Y. Lee, J. Lim et al., Balancing activity, stability and conductivity of nanoporous core–shell iridium/iridium oxide oxygen evolution catalysts. Nat. Commun. 8, 1449 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-01734-7
  32. S. Geiger, O. Kasian, B.R. Shrestha, A.M. Mingers, K.J.J. Mayrhofer et al., Activity and stability of electrochemically and thermally treated iridium for the oxygen evolution reaction. J. Electrochem. Soc. 163, F3132–F3138 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.0181611jes
  33. T.R. Hellstern, J.D. Benck, J. Kibsgaard, C. Hahn, T.F. Jaramillo, Engineering cobalt phosphide (CoP) thin film catalysts for enhanced hydrogen evolution activity on silicon photocathodes. Adv. Energy Mater. 6, 1501758 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201501758
  34. Y. Hao, S.-F. Hung, W.-J. Zeng, Y. Wang, C. Zhang et al., Switching the oxygen evolution mechanism on atomically dispersed Ru for enhanced acidic reaction kinetics. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 145, 23659–23669 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.3c07777
  35. G. Kresse, J. Furthmüller, Efficient iterative schemes for ab initio total-energy calculations using a plane-wave basis set. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 54, 11169–11186 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.54.11169
  36. G. Kresse, D. Joubert, From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B 59, 1758–1775 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.59.1758
  37. G. Kresse, J. Hafner, Ab initio molecular dynamics for liquid metals. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 47, 558–561 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.47.558
  38. J.P. Perdew, K. Burke, M. Ernzerhof, Generalized gradient approximation made simple. Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865–3868 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevlett.77.3865
  39. P.E. Blöchl, Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B Condens. Matter 50, 17953–17979 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.50.17953
  40. S. Niu, S. Li, Y. Du, X. Han, P. Xu, How to reliably report the overpotential of an electrocatalyst. ACS Energy Lett. 5, 1083–1087 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.0c00321
  41. S. Anantharaj, P.E. Karthik, S. Noda, The significance of properly reporting turnover frequency in electrocatalysis research. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 23051–23067 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202110352
  42. S. Geiger, O. Kasian, M. Ledendecker, E. Pizzutilo, A.M. Mingers et al., The stability number as a metric for electrocatalyst stability benchmarking. Nat. Catal. 1, 508–515 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-018-0085-6
  43. C. Van Pham, M. Bühler, J. Knöppel, M. Bierling, D. Seeberger et al., IrO2 coated TiO2 core–shell microps advance performance of low loading proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 269, 118762 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.118762
  44. L. Yang, K. Zhang, H. Chen, L. Shi, X. Liang et al., An ultrathin two-dimensional iridium-based perovskite oxide electrocatalyst with highly efficient {001} facets for acidic water oxidation. J. Energy Chem. 66, 619–627 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2021.09.016
  45. R. Zhang, N. Dubouis, M. BenOsman, W. Yin, M.T. Sougrati et al., A dissolution/precipitation equilibrium on the surface of iridium-based perovskites controls their activity as oxygen evolution reaction catalysts in acidic media. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58, 4571–4575 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201814075
  46. J. Edgington, R. Vicente, S. Vispute, R. Li, M.E. Sweers et al., Dynamics of highly active Ln3IrO7 catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in acid. Adv. Energy Mater. 14, 2402333 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202402333
  47. Z. Xie, H. Chen, X. Wang, Y.A. Wu, Z. Wang et al., Honeycomb-structured IrOx foam platelets as the building block of anode catalyst layer in PEM water electrolyzer. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 64, e202415032 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202415032
  48. Y. Xu, Z. Mao, J. Zhang, J. Ji, Y. Zou et al., Strain-modulated Ru–O covalency in Ru–Sn oxide enabling efficient and stable water oxidation in acidic solution. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 63, e202316029 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202316029
  49. G. Yu, R. Li, Y. Zhang, X. Lin, G. Wang et al., Constructing high coordination number of Ir–O–Ru bonds in IrRuOè nanomeshes for highly stable acidic oxygen evolution reaction. Nano Res. 17, 5073–5079 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-024-6524-6
  50. H. Dai, S. Shi, L. Yang, C. Guo, X. Chen, Recent progress on the corrosion behavior of metallic materials in HF solution. Corros. Rev. 39, 313–337 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1515/corrrev-2020-0101
  51. W.-Q. Chen, S.-M. Zhang, J. Qiu, Surface analysis and corrosion behavior of pure titanium under fluoride exposure. J. Prosthet. Dent. 124(239), e1-239239.e8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.02.022
  52. A. Kocijan, D.K. Merl, M. Jenko, The corrosion behaviour of austenitic and duplex stainless steels in artificial saliva with the addition of fluoride. Corros. Sci. 53, 776–783 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.corsci.2010.11.010
  53. M.C. Li, C.L. Zeng, H.C. Lin, C.N. Cao, Electrochemical corrosion behaviour of type 316 stainless steel in acid media containing fluoride ions. Br. Corros. J. 36, 179–183 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1179/bcj.2001.36.3.179
  54. H. Li, Y. Liu, S. Pang, P.K. Liaw, T. Zhang, Corrosion fatigue behavior of a Mg-based bulk metallic glass in a simulated physiological environment. Intermetallics 73, 31–39 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intermet.2016.03.003
  55. C. Han, T. Wang, Understanding the catalytic performances of metal-doped Ta2O5 catalysts for acidic oxygen evolution reaction with computations. Chem. Sci. 15, 14371–14378 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1039/d4sc03554b
  56. C. Baik, J. Cho, J.I. Cha, Y. Cho, S.S. Jang et al., Electron-rich Ir nanostructure supported on mesoporous Ta2O5 for enhanced activity and stability of oxygen evolution reaction. J. Power. Sources 575, 233174 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2023.233174
  57. J.S. Dondapati, A.R. Thiruppathi, A. Salverda, A. Chen, Comparison of Pt and IrO2-Ta2O5/Ti as a counter electrode in acidic media. Electrochem. Commun. 124, 106946 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2021.106946
  58. T. Reier, H.N. Nong, D. Teschner, R. Schlögl, P. Strasser, Electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction in acidic environments–reaction mechanisms and catalysts. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1601275 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201601275
  59. A. Minguzzi, O. Lugaresi, E. Achilli, C. Locatelli, A. Vertova et al., Observing the oxidation state turnover in heterogeneous iridium-based water oxidation catalysts. Chem. Sci. 5, 3591–3597 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/C4SC00975D
  60. T. Reier, Z. Pawolek, S. Cherevko, M. Bruns, T. Jones et al., Molecular insight in structure and activity of highly efficient, low-Ir Ir-Ni oxide catalysts for electrochemical water splitting (OER). J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137, 13031–13040 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b07788
  61. E. Atanassova, G. Tyuliev, A. Paskaleva, D. Spassov, K. Kostov, XPS study of N2 annealing effect on thermal Ta2O5 layers on Si. Appl. Surf. Sci. 225, 86–99 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2003.09.040
  62. Y. Wen, P. Chen, L. Wang, S. Li, Z. Wang et al., Stabilizing highly active Ru sites by suppressing lattice oxygen participation in acidic water oxidation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143, 6482–6490 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c00384
  63. Y. Qin, T. Yu, S. Deng, X.-Y. Zhou, D. Lin et al., RuO2 electronic structure and lattice strain dual engineering for enhanced acidic oxygen evolution reaction performance. Nat. Commun. 13, 3784 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-31468-0
  64. R. Liu, C. Wang, Y. Yan, R. Wang, G. Chen, Reversed charge transfer to modulate the d-band center of Pd for efficient direct H2O2 synthesis. ACS Catal. 14, 3955–3965 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.3c05910
Read More
Author biographies are not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF SUPPLEMENTARY FILE
Statistic
Read Counter : 0 Download : 0

Most read articles by the same author(s)