Issue

Vol. 16 (2024)

Core–Shell Semiconductor-Graphene Nanoarchitectures for Efficient Photocatalysis: State of the Art and Perspectives

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-024-01503-4
Jinshen Lan
Engineering Research Center of Micro‑Nano Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Ministry of Education, Fujian Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials and Applications, CI Center for OSED, Department of Physics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, People’s Republic of China
Shanzhi Qu
Engineering Research Center of Micro‑Nano Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Ministry of Education, Fujian Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials and Applications, CI Center for OSED, Department of Physics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, People’s Republic of China
Xiaofang Ye
Engineering Research Center of Micro‑Nano Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Ministry of Education, Fujian Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials and Applications, CI Center for OSED, Department of Physics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, People’s Republic of China
Yifan Zheng
Engineering Research Center of Micro‑Nano Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Ministry of Education, Fujian Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials and Applications, CI Center for OSED, Department of Physics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, People’s Republic of China
Mengwei Ma
Engineering Research Center of Micro‑Nano Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Ministry of Education, Fujian Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials and Applications, CI Center for OSED, Department of Physics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, People’s Republic of China
Shengshi Guo
Engineering Research Center of Micro‑Nano Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Ministry of Education, Fujian Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials and Applications, CI Center for OSED, Department of Physics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, People’s Republic of China
Shengli Huang
Engineering Research Center of Micro‑Nano Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Ministry of Education, Fujian Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials and Applications, CI Center for OSED, Department of Physics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, People’s Republic of China
Shuping Li
Engineering Research Center of Micro‑Nano Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Ministry of Education, Fujian Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials and Applications, CI Center for OSED, Department of Physics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, People’s Republic of China
Junyong Kang
Engineering Research Center of Micro‑Nano Optoelectronic Materials and Devices, Ministry of Education, Fujian Key Laboratory of Semiconductor Materials and Applications, CI Center for OSED, Department of Physics, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, People’s Republic of China

Corresponding Author: Shuping Li

lsp@xmu.edu.cn

Nano-Micro Letters, Vol. 16 (2024), Article Number: 280

Abstract

Semiconductor photocatalysis holds great promise for renewable energy generation and environment remediation, but generally suffers from the serious drawbacks on light absorption, charge generation and transport, and structural stability that limit the performance. The core–shell semiconductor-graphene (CSSG) nanoarchitectures may address these issues due to their unique structures with exceptional physical and chemical properties. This review explores recent advances of the CSSG nanoarchitectures in the photocatalytic performance. It starts with the classification of the CSSG nanoarchitectures by the dimensionality. Then, the construction methods under internal and external driving forces were introduced and compared with each other. Afterward, the physicochemical properties and photocatalytic applications of these nanoarchitectures were discussed, with a focus on their role in photocatalysis. It ends with a summary and some perspectives on future development of the CSSG nanoarchitectures toward highly efficient photocatalysts with extensive application. By harnessing the synergistic capabilities of the CSSG architectures, we aim to address pressing environmental and energy challenges and drive scientific progress in these fields.


Highlights:
1 The constructions under internal and external driving forces were introduced and compared with each other.
2 The physicochemical properties were analyzed for the assessment of crystalline quality and photoelectric characteristics.
3 The photocatalytic applications, mechanisms, and developments of the core-shell semiconductor-graphene nanoarchitectures were illustrated in detail.

Keywords

Core–shell semiconductor-graphene Nanoarchitecture Photocatalysis Driving force Interface
Lan, Jinshen, Shanzhi Qu, Xiaofang Ye, Yifan Zheng, Mengwei Ma, Shengshi Guo, Shengli Huang, Shuping Li, and Junyong Kang. 2024. “Core–Shell Semiconductor-Graphene Nanoarchitectures for Efficient Photocatalysis: State of the Art and Perspectives”. Nano-Micro Letters 16 (September):280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-024-01503-4.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. F. Wang, Q. Li, D. Xu, Recent progress in semiconductor-based nanocomposite photocatalysts for solar-to-chemical energy conversion. Adv. Energy Mater. 7, 1700529 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201700529
  2. H. Zhou, Y. Qu, T. Zeida, X. Duan, Towards highly efficient photocatalysts using semiconductor nanoarchitectures. Energy Environ. Sci. 5, 6732 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1039/c2ee03447f
  3. Z.H. Jabbar, S.E. Ebrahim, Recent advances in nano-semiconductors photocatalysis for degrading organic contaminants and microbial disinfection in wastewater: a comprehensive review. Environ. Nanotechnol. Monit. Manage. 17, 100666 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2022.100666
  4. L. Zhang, M. Jaroniec, Toward designing semiconductor-semiconductor heterojunctions for photocatalytic applications. Appl. Surf. Sci. 430, 2–17 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.07.192
  5. M. Pirhashemi, A. Habibi-Yangjeh, S.R. Pouran, Review on the criteria anticipated for the fabrication of highly efficient ZnO-based visible-light-driven photocatalysts. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 62, 1–25 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2018.01.012
  6. H. Wang, L. Zhang, Z. Chen, J. Hu, S. Li et al., Semiconductor heterojunction photocatalysts: design, construction, and photocatalytic performances. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43, 5234 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00126e
  7. C. Feng, Z.-P. Wu, K.-W. Huang, J. Ye, H. Zhang, Surface modification of 2D photocatalysts for solar energy conversion. Adv. Mater. 34, 2200180 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202200180
  8. S.A. Jitan, G. Palmisano, C. Garlisi, Synthesis and surface modification of TiO2-based photocatalysts for the conversion of CO2. Catalysts 10, 227 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10020227
  9. L. Jiang, X. Huang, Y. Zhou, S. Huang, Y. Wang et al., High photocatalytic performance of ferroelectric AgNbO3 in a doping state. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 11, 110402 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2023.110402
  10. T. Xu, X. Liu, S. Wang, L. Li, Ferroelectric oxide nanocomposites with trimodal pore structure for high photocatalytic performance. Nano-Micro Lett. 11, 37 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-019-0268-y
  11. Y. Li, L. Wang, F. Zhang, W. Zhang, G. Shao et al., Detecting and quantifying wavelength-dependent electrons transfer in heterostructure catalyst via in situ irradiation XPS. Adv. Sci. 10, 2205020 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202205020
  12. L. Wang, Y. Li, Y. Ai, E. Fan, F. Zhang et al., Tracking heterogeneous interface charge reverse separation in SrTiO3/NiO/NiS nanofibers with in situ irradiation XPS. Adv. Funct. Mater. 33, 2306466 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202306466
  13. S. Liu, N. Zhang, Y.-J. Xu, Core–shell structured nanocomposites for photocatalytic selective organic transformations. Part. Part. Syst. Charact. 31, 540–556 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/ppsc.201300235
  14. A. Shafiee, N. Rabiee, S. Ahmadi, M. Baneshi, M. Khatami et al., Core−shell nanophotocatalysts: Review of materials and applications. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 5, 55–86 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.1c03714
  15. S. Wang, Y. Zhang, Y. Zheng, Y. Xu, G. Yang et al., Plasmonic metal mediated charge transfer in stacked core–shell semiconductor heterojunction for significantly enhanced CO2 photoreduction. Small 19, 2204774 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202204774
  16. D. He, C. Zhang, G. Zeng, Y. Yang, D. Huang et al., A multifunctional platform by controlling of carbon nitride in the core-shell structure: from design to construction, and catalysis applications. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 258, 117957 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.117957
  17. I. Khan, N. Baig, S. Ali, M. Usman, S.A. Khan et al., Progress in layered cathode and anode nanoarchitectures for charge storage devices: challenges and future perspective. Energy Storage Mater. 35, 443–469 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2020.11.033
  18. W. Luo, S. Zafeiratos, A brief review of the synthesis and catalytic applications of graphene-coated oxides. ChemCatChem 9, 2432–2442 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201700178
  19. W. Lu, L. Guo, Y. Jia, Y. Guo, Z. Li et al., Significant enhancement in photocatalytic activity of high quality SiC/graphene core–shell heterojunction with optimal structural parameters. RSC Adv. 4, 46771 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ra06026a
  20. N. Gao, X. Fang, Synthesis and development of graphene−inorganic semiconductor nanocomposites. Chem. Rev. 115, 8294–8343 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400607y
  21. J.S. Lee, K.H. You, C.B. Park, Highly photoactive, low bandgap TiO2 nanops wrapped by graphene. Adv. Mater. 24, 1084–1088 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201104110
  22. S. Lin, Y. Lu, J. Xu, S. Feng, J. Li, High performance graphene/semiconductor van der Waals heterostructure optoelectronic devices. Nano Energy 40, 122–148 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.07.036
  23. H.T. Tung, H.K. Dan, D. Thomas, H.K. Jun, L.T.N. Tu, The preparation of reduced graphene oxide—Cu2S by hydrothermal method for quantum dot sensitized solar cells. Opt. Mater. 139, 113725 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.optmat.2023.113725
  24. H. Yin, G. Zhan, R. Yan, X. Wu, Q. Hu et al., P–n heterogeneous Sb2S3/SnO2 quantum dot anchored reduced graphene oxide nanosheets for high-performance lithium-ion batteries. Dalton Trans. 53, 7142–7151 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1039/d4dt00153b
  25. L. Syam-Sundar, M. Amin-Mir, M. Waqar-Ashraf, F. Djavanroodi, Synthesis and characterization of graphene and its composites for Lithium-Ion battery applications: a comprehensive review. Alex. Eng. J. 78, 224–245 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2023.07.044
  26. R. Hou, S. Zhang, Y. Zhang, N. Li, S. Wang et al., A “three-region” configuration for enhanced electrochemical kinetics and high-areal capacity lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2200302 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202200302
  27. Y. Zhang, Z. Wu, S. Wang, N. Li, S.R.P. Silva et al., Complex permittivity-dependent plasma confinementassisted growth of asymmetric vertical graphene nanofiber membrane for high-performance Li-S full cells. InfoMat 4, e12294 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/inf2.12294
  28. S. Nongthombam, N.A. Devi, S. Sinha, R. Bhujel, S. Rai et al., Reduced graphene oxide/gallium nitride nanocomposites for supercapacitor applications. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 141, 109406 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpcs.2020.109406
  29. S. Nagarani, G. Sasikala, M. Yuvaraj, R. Dhilip-Kumar, S. Balachandran et al., ZnO-CuO nanops enameled on reduced graphene nanosheets as electrode materials for supercapacitors applications. J. Energy Storage 52, 104969 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2022.104969
  30. H. Tian, A. Hu, Q. Liu, X. He, X. Guo, Interface-induced high responsivity in hybrid graphene/GaAs photodetector. Adv. Optical Mater. 2020, 1901741 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201901741
  31. M.A. Iqbal, N. Anwar, M. Malik, M. Al-Bahrani, M.R. Islam et al., Nanostructures/graphene/silicon junction-based high-performance photodetection systems: progress, challenges, and future trends. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 10, 2202208 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/admi.202202208
  32. Y. Hu, C. Zhou, H. Wang, M. Chen, G. Zeng et al., Recent advance of graphene/semiconductor composite nanocatalysts: synthesis, mechanism, applications and perspectives. Chem. Eng. J. 414, 128795 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.128795
  33. M.A. Ahmed, A.A. Mohamed, Recent progress in semiconductor/graphene photocatalysts: synthesis, photocatalytic applications, and challenges. RSC Adv. 13, 421 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ra07225d
  34. A. Mondal, A. Prabhakaran, S. Gupta, V.R. Subramanian, Boosting photocatalytic activity using reduced graphene oxide (RGO)/semiconductor nanocomposites: issues and future scope. ACS Omega 6, 8734–8743 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.0c06045
  35. Y. Chen, B.Y. Zhai, Y.N. Liang, Y. Li, Hybrid photocatalysts using semiconductor/MOF/graphene oxide for superior photodegradation of organic pollutants under visible light. Mat. Sci. Semicon. Proc. 107, 104838 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mssp.2019.104838
  36. C. He, X. Bu, S. Yang, P. He, G. Ding et al., Core-shell SrTiO3/graphene structure by chemical vapor deposition for enhanced photocatalytic performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 436, 373–381 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.12.063
  37. Y. Zhang, D. Li, Y. Zhang, X. Zhou, S. Guo et al., Graphene-wrapped Bi2O2CO3 core–shell structures with enhanced quantum efficiency profit from an ultrafast electron transfer process. J. Mater. Chem. A 2, 8273 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ta00088a
  38. D. Shao, M. Yu, H. Sun, T. Hu, J. Lian et al., High responsivity, fast ultraviolet photodetector fabricated from ZnO nanop–graphene core–shell structures. Nanoscale 5, 3664 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr00369h
  39. L. Yu, Q. Yang, G. Zhu, R. Che, Preparation and lithium storage of core–shell honeycomb-like Co3O4@C microspheres. RSC Adv. 12, 29818 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ra05204k
  40. W. Zhou, J. Zhu, C. Cheng, J. Liu, H. Yang et al., A general strategy toward graphene@metal oxide core–shell nanostructures for high-performance lithium storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 4, 4954 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/c1ee02168k
  41. Q. Wu, L. Yang, X. Wang, Z. Hu, Carbon-based nanocages: a new platform for advanced energy storage and conversion. Adv. Mater. 32, 1904177 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201904177
  42. M.I.A. Abdel-Maksoud, R.A. Fahim, A.E. Shalan, M. Abd-Elkodous, S.O. Olojede et al., Advanced materials and technologies for supercapacitors used in energy conversion and storage: a review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 19, 375–437 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10311-020-01075-w
  43. H. Zhang, D. Yang, A. Lau, T. Ma, H. Lin et al., Hybridized graphene for supercapacitors: beyond the limitation of pure graphene. Small 17, 2007311 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202007311
  44. H. Feng, L. Tang, G. Zeng, J. Tang, Y. Deng et al., Carbon-based core–shell nanostructured materials for electrochemical energy storage. J. Mater. Chem. A 6, 7310 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ta01257a
  45. K.S. Lee, J. Shim, J.S. Lee, J. Lee, H.G. Moon et al., Adsorption behavior of NO2 molecules in ZnO-mono/multilayer graphene core–shell quantum dots for NO2 gas sensor. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 106, 279–286 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2021.11.003
  46. X. Chen, Y. Zhan, A. Sun, Q. Feng, W. Yang et al., Anchoring the TiO2@crumpled graphene oxide core–shell sphere onto electrospun polymer fibrous membrane for the fast separation of multi-component pollutant-oil–water emulsion. Sep. Purif. Technol. 298, 121605 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.121605
  47. M.M. Tavakoli, H. Aashuri, A. Simchi, S. Kalytchuk, Z. Fan, Quasi core/shell lead sulfide/graphene quantum dots for bulk heterojunction solar cells. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 18886–18895 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b04195
  48. P. Shankar, M.Q. Hafzan-Ishak, J.K. Padarti, N. Mintcheva, S. Iwamori et al., ZnO@graphene oxide core@shell nanops prepared via one-pot approach based on laser ablation in water. Appl. Surf. Sci. 531, 147365 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147365
  49. D.I. Son, B.W. Kwon, D.H. Park, W.-S. Seo, Y. Yi et al., Emissive ZnO–graphene quantum dots for white-light-emitting diodes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 7, 465–471 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2012.71
  50. Y. Fei, X. Ye, A.S. Al-Baldawy, J. Wan, J. Lan et al., Enhanced photocatalytic performance of TiO2 nanowires by substituting noble metal ps with reduced graphene oxide. Curr. Appl. Phys. 44, 33–39 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cap.2022.09.008
  51. X. Li, Y. Zhang, T. Li, Q. Zhong, H. Li et al., Graphene nanoscrolls encapsulated TiO2 (B) nanowires for lithium storage. J. Power. Sources 268, 372–378 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.06.056
  52. S. Kang, J. Hwang, rGO-wrapped Ag-doped TiO2 nanofibers for photocatalytic CO2 reduction under visible light. J. Clean. Prod. 374, 134022 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.134022
  53. D. Kathiravan, B.-R. Huang, A. Saravanan, Self-assembled hierarchical interfaces of ZnO nanotubes/graphene heterostructures for efficient room temperature hydrogen sensors. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 12064–12072 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b00338
  54. X. Ye, Y. Tian, M. Gao, F. Cheng, J. Lan et al., Efficient photocatalytic core–shell synthesis of titanate nanowire/rGO. Catalysts 14, 218 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal14040218
  55. H.-J. Kim, S.E. Lee, J. Lee, J.-Y. Jung, E.-S. Lee et al., Gold-coated silicon nanowire–graphene core–shell composite film as a polymer binder-free anode for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Physica E 61, 204–209 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2014.03.030
  56. S.M. Ji, A.P. Tiwari, H.Y. Kim, Graphene oxide coated zinc oxide core–shell nanofibers for enhanced photocatalytic performance and durability. Coatings 10, 1183 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/coatings10121183
  57. Y. Jia, X. Jiang, A. Ahmed, L. Zhou, Q. Fan et al., Microfluidic spinning of core–shell α-MnO2@graphene fibers with porous network structure for all-solid-state flexible supercapacitors. J. Electrochem. Soc. 168, 070514 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1149/1945-7111/ac0f85
  58. H. Yu, P. Joo, D. Lee, B.-S. Kim, J.H. Oh, Photoinduced charge-carrier dynamics of phototransistors based on perylene diimide/reduced graphene oxide core/shell p–n junction nanowires. Adv. Optical Mater. 3, 241–247 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adom.201400346
  59. D. Xia, Q. Xue, J. Xie, H. Chen, C. Lv, Silicon/graphene core/shell nanowires produced by self-scrolling. Comp. Mater. Sci. 49, 588–592 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2010.05.053
  60. J. Lin, H. Jia, H. Liang, S. Chen, Y. Cai et al., In situ synthesis of vertical standing nanosized NiO encapsulated in graphene as electrodes for highperformance supercapacitors. Adv. Sci. 5, 1700687 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201700687
  61. J. Yus, Y. Bravo, A.J. Sanchez-Herencia, B. Ferrari, Z. Gonzalez, Electrophoretic deposition of RGO-NiO core-shell nanostructures driven by heterocoagulation method with high electrochemical performance. Electrochim. Acta 308, 363–372 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.04.053
  62. F. Kirschvink, M. Stürzel, Y. Thomann, R. Mülhaupt, Gas phase mineralized graphene as core/shell nanosheet supports for single-site olefin polymerization catalysts and in-situ formation of graphene/polyolefin nanocomposites. Polymer 55, 4547–4550 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2014.07.017
  63. Q. Liu, S. Wang, Q. Ren, T. Li, G. Tu et al., Stacking design in photocatalysis: synergizing cocatalyst roles and anti-corrosion functions of metallic MoS2 and graphene for remarkable hydrogen evolution over CdS. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 1552 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta10255e
  64. L. Han, Y.N. Hao, X. Wei, X.W. Chen, Y. Shu et al., Hollow copper sulfide nanosphere−doxorubicin/graphene oxide core−shell nanocomposite for photothermo-chemotherapy. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 3, 3230–3235 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsbiomaterials.7b00643
  65. S. Bera, A. Naskar, M. Pal, S. Jana, Low temperature synthesis of graphene hybridized surface defective hierarchical core–shell structured ZnO hollow microspheres with longterm stable and enhanced photoelectrochemical activity. RSC Adv. 6, 36058 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6ra03410a
  66. E. Vasilaki, N. Katsarakis, S. Dokianakis, M. Vamvakaki, rGO functionalized ZnO–TiO2 core-shell flower-like architectures for visible light photocatalysis. Catalysts 11, 332 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal11030332
  67. H. Liu, T. Lv, Z. Zhu, Template-assisted synthesis of hollow TiO2@rGO core–shell structural nanospheres with enhanced photocatalytic activity. J. Mol. Catal. A-Chem. 404–405, 178–185 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2015.04.022
  68. D. Zhang, Q. Wei, H. Huang, L. Jiang, J. Teng et al., Ambient-condition strategy for production of hollow Ga2O3@rGO crystalline nanostructures toward efficient lithium storage. Energy Environ. Mater. 7, e12585 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.12585
  69. Y. Zhao, X. Zhang, C. Wang, Y. Zhao, H. Zhou et al., The synthesis of hierarchical nanostructured MoS2/graphene composites with enhanced visible-light photo-degradation property. Appl. Surf. Sci. 412, 207–213 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.181
  70. W. Zhai, Q. Ai, L. Chen, S. Wei, D. Li et al., Walnut-inspired microsized porous silicon/graphene core–shell composites for high-performance lithium-ion battery anodes. Nano Res. 10, 4274–4283 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-017-1584-5
  71. Y. Bu, Z. Chen, W. Li, Dramatically enhanced photocatalytic properties of Ag-modified graphene–ZnO quasi-shell–core heterojunction composite material. RSC Adv. 3, 24118 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ra44047h
  72. Y. Zhang, L. Song, Y. Zhang, P. Wang, Y. Liu et al., A facile method for synthesis of well-coated ZnO@graphene core/shell structure by self-assembly of amine-functionalized ZnO and graphene oxide. Chem. Phys. Lett. 654, 107–113 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cplett.2016.05.023
  73. L. Kuai, Y. Zhou, W. Tu, P. Li, H. Li et al., Rational construction of a CdS/reduced graphene oxide/TiO2 core–shell nanostructure as an allsolid-state Z-scheme system for CO2 photoreduction into solar fuels. RSC Adv. 5, 88409 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ra14374h
  74. I. John-Peter, N. Rajamanickam, S. Vijaya, S. Anandan, K. Ramachandran et al., TiO2/graphene quantum dots core-shell based photo anodes with TTIP treatment—a perspective way of enhancing the short circuit current. Sol. Energy Mat. Sol. C. 205, 110239 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solmat.2019.110239
  75. C. Zou, D. Ma, Y. Su, M. Zhu, B. Zhou et al., Three-dimensional Au nanops-decorated γ-Fe2O3@reduced graphene oxide core-shell heterojunctions for highly sensitive room-temperature gas sensors. Ceram. Int. 48, 37064–37074 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.08.281
  76. Q. Wu, H. Bai, R. Zhao, A. Gao, H. Deng et al., Core-shell ZrO2@GO hybrid for effective interfacial adhesion improvement of carbon fiber/epoxy composites. Surf. Interfaces 40, 103070 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surfin.2023.103070
  77. M. Romero, V. Mello, C. Boher, A.P. Tschiptschin, C. Scandian, On the tribological behavior of cobalt-based nanocomposite coatings containing ZnO@Graphene oxide core-shell nanops. Wear 522, 204835 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wear.2023.204835
  78. C. Kim, C. Park, Formation of Al2O3-graphite core shells versus growth time by using thermal chemical vapor deposition. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 69, 842–846 (2016). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.69.842
  79. A.R. Biris, D. Toloman, A. Popa, M.D. Lazar, G.K. Kannarpady et al., Synthesis of tunable core–shell nanostructures based on TiO2-graphene architectures and their application in the photodegradation of rhodamine dyes. Phys. E 81, 326–333 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physe.2016.03.028
  80. M. Zubair, E.M.M. Vanhaecke, I.-H. Svenum, M. Rønning, J. Yang, Core-shell ps of C-doped CdS and graphene: a noble metal-free approach for efficient photocatalytic H2 generation. Green Energy Environ. 5, 461–472 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gee.2020.10.017
  81. Q. Wu, H. Bai, R. Zhao, Z. Ye, H. Deng et al., Amine-caged ZrO2@GO multilayer core-shell hybrids in epoxy matrix for enhancing interfacial adhesion of carbon fiber composites. Compos. Part B-Eng. 245, 110207 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110207
  82. S. Naghdi, A. Cherevan, A. Giesriegl, R. Guillet-Nicolas, S. Biswas et al., Selective ligand removal to improve accessibility of active sites in hierarchical MOFs for heterogeneous photocatalysis. Nat. Commun. 13, 282 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27775-7
  83. J.K. Bristow, K.L. Svane, D. Tiana, J.M. Skelton, J.D. Gale et al., Free energy of ligand removal in the metal−organic framework UiO-66. J. Phys. Chem. C 120, 9276–9281 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.6b01659
  84. C. Frank-Rotsch, N. Dropka, F.-M. Kießling, P. Rudolph, Semiconductor crystal growth under the influence of magnetic fields. Cryst. Res. Technol. 55, 1900115 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/crat.201900115
  85. A. Bagri, C. Mattevi, M. Acik, Y.J. Chabal, M. Chhowalla et al., Structural evolution during the reduction of chemically derived graphene oxide. Nat. Chem. 2, 581–587 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.686
  86. Z. Xiang, J. Qian, Y. Zhou, F. Liu, C. Qi et al., Synthesis of quasi-core–shell Co-doped ZnO/graphene nanops. Mater. Lett. 161, 286–288 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2015.08.128
  87. J. Zhang, L. Chen, Y. Wang, S. Cai, H. Yang et al., VO2(B)/Graphene composite-based symmetrical supercapacitor electrode via screen printing for intelligent packaging. Nanomaterials 8, 1020 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/nano8121020
  88. S. Mpelane, N. Mketo, M. Mlambo, N. Bingwa, P.N. Nomngongo, One-step synthesis of a Mn-doped Fe2O3/GO core−shell nanocomposite and its application for the adsorption of levofloxacin in aqueous solution. ACS Omega 7, 23302–23314 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.2c01460
  89. R. Preetha, M. Govinda-raj, E. Vijayakumar, M.G. Narendran, B. Neppolian et al., Quasi-in situ synthesis of oxygen vacancy-enriched strontium iron oxide supported on boron-doped reduced graphene oxide to elevate the photocatalytic destruction of tetracycline. Langmuir 39, 7091–7108 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.3c00340
  90. Y.T. Xu, Y. Guo, L.X. Song, K. Zhang, M.M.F. Yuen et al., Co-reduction self-assembly of reduced graphene oxide nanosheets coated Cu2O sub-microspheres core-shell composites as lithium ion battery anode materials. Electrochim. Acta 176, 434–441 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2015.06.093
  91. D. Chen, H. Quan, J. Liang, L. Guo, One-pot synthesis of hematite@graphene core@shell nanostructures for superior lithium storage. Nanoscale 5, 9684 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr03484d
  92. R. Peng, Y. Li, J. Chen, P. Si, J. Feng et al., Reduced graphene oxide wrapped Au@ZnO core-shell structure for highly selective triethylamine gas sensing application at a low temperature. Sensor. Actuat. A-Phys. 283, 128–133 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2018.09.063
  93. Y. Khan, A.R. Urade, A.D. Adhikari, P.C. Maity, K. Ramesh et al., Electrochemical performance of binder-free Ni(OH)2/RGO battery type electrode materials for supercapacitor. Int. J. Green Energy 20, 725–733 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1080/15435075.2022.2088238
  94. A. Nekooei, M.R. Miroliaei, M.S. Nejad, H. Sheibani, Enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity of ZnS/S-graphene quantum dots reinforced with Ag2S nanops. Mat. Sci. Eng. B-Adv. 284, 115884 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mseb.2022.115884
  95. G. Hong, Q.-H. Wu, J. Ren, S.-T. Lee, Mechanism of non-metal catalytic growth of graphene on silicon. Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 231604 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4726114
  96. W. Lu, D. Wang, L. Guo, Y. Jia, M. Ye et al., Bipolar carrier transfer channels in epitaxial graphene/SiC core–shell heterojunction for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Adv. Mater. 27, 7986–7991 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201503606
  97. A. Castellano-Soria, J. López-Sánchez, C. Granados-Miralles, M. Varela, E. Navarro et al., Novel one-pot sol-gel synthesis route of Fe3C/few-layered graphene core/shell nanops embedded in a carbon matrix. J. Alloy. Compd. 902, 163662 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2022.163662
  98. M. Kırkbınar, A. Demir, S. Altındal, F. Çalıskan, The effect of different rates of ultra-thin gossamer-like rGO coatings on photocatalytic performance in ZnO core-shell structures for optoelectronic applications. Diam. Relat. Mater. 130, 109435 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diamond.2022.109435
  99. X. Tie, Q. Han, C. Liang, B. Li, J. Zai et al., Si@SiOx/graphene nanosheets composite: Ball milling synthesis and enhanced lithium strorage performance. Front. Mater. 4, 47 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmats.2017.00047
  100. H. Tao, L. Xiong, S. Zhu, L. Zhang, X. Yang, Porous Si/C/reduced graphene oxide microspheres by spray drying as anode for Li-ion batteries. J. Electroanal. Chem. 797, 16–22 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2017.05.010
  101. Q. Pan, P. Zuo, S. Lou, T. Mu, C. Du et al., Micro-sized spherical silicon@carbon@graphene prepared by spray drying as anode material for lithium-ion batteries. J. Alloy. Compd. 723, 434–440 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.217
  102. A. Jamaluddin, B. Umesh, F. Chen, J.-K. Chang, C.-Y. Su, Facile synthesis of core–shell structured Si@graphene balls as a high-performance anode for lithium-ion batteries. Nanoscale 12, 9616 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0nr01346c
  103. A. Jana, D.H. Gregory, Microwave-assisted synthesis of ZnO–rGO core–shell nanorod hybrids with photo- and electro-catalytic activity. Chem. Eur. J. 26, 6703–6714 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202000535
  104. C.L. Sun, C.T. Chang, H.H. Lee, J. Zhou, J. Wang et al., Microwave-assisted synthesis of a core-shell MWCNT/GONR heterostructure for the electrochemical detection of ascorbic acid, dopamine, and uric acid. ACS Nano 5, 7788–7795 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/nn2015908
  105. R.K. Singh, R. Kumar, D.P. Singh, R. Savu, S.A. Moshkalev, Progress in microwave-assisted synthesis of quantum dots (graphene/carbon/semiconducting) for bioapplications: a review. Mater. Today Chem. 12, 282–314 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtchem.2019.03.001
  106. K. Xia, G. Wang, H. Zhang, Y. Yu, L. Liu et al., Synthesis and characterization of nitrogen-doped graphene hollow spheres as electrode material for supercapacitors. J. Nanopart. Res. 19, 254 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11051-017-3954-z
  107. M. Liu, M. Shi, W. Lu, D. Zhu, L. Li et al., Core–shell reduced graphene oxide/MnOx@carbon hollow nanospheres for high performance supercapacitor electrodes. Chem. Eng. J. 313, 518–526 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2016.12.091
  108. C. Wang, J. Chen, Y. Shi, M. Zheng, Q. Dong, Preparation and performance of a core–shell carbon/sulfur material for lithium/sulfur battery. Electrochim. Acta 55, 7010–7015 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2010.06.019
  109. S.I. Ghazanlou, S.I. Ghazanlou, S.I. Ghazanlou, H. Karimi, N. Azimi et al., Multifunctional performance of core–shell rGO@Fe3O4 on the mechanical, electrical/thermal, EMI, and microstructure properties of cement-based composites. Constr. Build. Mater. 394, 132182 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132182
  110. S.S.P. Haghshenas, A. Nemati, A. Simchi, C.-U. Kim, Dispute in photocatalytic and photoluminescence behavior in ZnO/graphene oxide core-shell nanops. Mater. Lett. 240, 117–120 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2018.12.095
  111. P. Makuła, M. Pacia, W. Macyk, How to correctly determine the band gap energy of modified semiconductor photocatalysts based on UV−Vis spectra. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 9, 6814–6817 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.8b02892
  112. S. Qu, J. Wan, X. Ye, J. Lan, Y. Fei et al., Interfacial charge transfer of MoS2/ZnO/Ag2S nanotube array for efficient photocatalytic performance. J. Photoch. Photobio. A 447, 115200 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jphotochem.2023.115200
  113. W.Y. Teoh, J.A. Scott, R. Amal, Progress in heterogeneous photocatalysis: from classical radical chemistry to engineering nanomaterials and solar reactors. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 3, 629–639 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/jz3000646
  114. O. Defaoui, A. Boudjemaa, B. Sabrina, B. Hayoun, M. Bourouina et al., Kinetic modeling and experimental study of photocatalytic process using graphene oxide/TiO2 composites. A case for wastewater treatment under sunlight. Reac. Kinet. Mech. Cat. 133, 1141–1162 (2021)
  115. Md. Rakibuddin, R. Ananthakrishnan, Effective photocatalytic dechlorination of 2,4-dichlorophenol by a novel graphene encapsulated ZnO/Co3O4 core–shell hybrid under visible light. Photochem. Photobiol. Sci. 15, 86 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5pp00305a
  116. H. Liu, X. Dong, X. Wang, C. Sun, J. Li et al., A green and direct synthesis of graphene oxide encapsulated TiO2 core/shell structures with enhanced photoactivity. Chem. Eng. J. 230, 279–285 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2013.06.092
  117. X. Li, S. Zheng, C. Zhang, C. Hu, F. Chen et al., Synergistic promotion of photocatalytic performance by core@shell structured TiO2/Au@rGO ternary photocatalyst. Mol. Catal. 438, 55–65 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcat.2017.05.016
  118. M. Wang, J. Han, H. Xiong, R. Guo, Yolk@shell nanoarchitecture of Au@r-GO/TiO2 hybrids as powerful visible light photocatalysts. Langmuir 31, 6220–6228 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.langmuir.5b01099
  119. H. Shen, X. Zhao, L. Duan, R. Liu, H. Wu et al., Influence of interface combination of RGO-photosensitized SnO2@RGO core-shell structures on their photocatalytic performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 391, 627–634 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2016.06.031
  120. D.V. Dao, T.T.N. Bich, N.T.T. Ha, W. Wang, T. Kim et al., Hematite Fe2O3@nitrogen-doped graphene core-shell photocatalyst for efficient cephalexin degradation under visible light irradiation. Ceram. Int. 48, 34533–34542 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ceramint.2022.08.037
  121. Q. Gong, Y. Liua, Z. Dang, Core-shell structured Fe3O4@GO@MIL-100(Fe) magnetic nanops as heterogeneous photo-Fenton catalyst for 2,4-dichlorophenol degradation under visible light. J. Hazard. Mater. 371, 677–686 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.03.019
  122. C. Feng, Y. Deng, L. Tang, G. Zeng, J. Wang et al., Core-shell Ag2CrO4/N-GQDs@g-C3N4 composites with anti-photocorrosion performance for enhanced full-spectrum-light photocatalytic activities. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 239, 525–536 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.08.049
  123. L. Allagui, B. Chouchene, T. Gries, G. Medjahdi, E. Girot et al., Core/shell rGO/BiOBr ps with visible photocatalytic activity towards water pollutants. Appl. Surf. Sci. 490, 580–591 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.091
  124. F. Gao, Q. Wan, J. Yuan, R. Lei, S. Lin et al., Highly efficient and durable core-shell catalyst with dual functions: Tungsten nitride quantum dots encapsulated in ultra-thin graphene. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 299, 120692 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120692
  125. N. Thangavel, S. Bellamkonda, A.D. Arulraj, G.R. Rao, B. Neppolian, Visible light induced efficient hydrogen production through semiconductor–conductor–semiconductor (S–C–S) interfaces formed between g-C3N4 and rGO/Fe2O3 core–shell composites. Catal. Sci. Technol. 8, 5081 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cy01248b
  126. R.A. Rather, S. Singh, B. Pal, Core–shell morphology of Au-TiO2@graphene oxide nanocomposite exhibiting enhanced hydrogen production from water. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 37, 288–294 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2016.03.039
  127. H. Jung, J. Song, S. Lee, Y.W. Lee, D.H. Wi et al., Hierarchical metal–semiconductor–graphene ternary heteronanostructures for plasmonenhanced wide-range visible-light photocatalysis. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 15831 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta03934a
  128. M. Zubair, I.-H. Svenum, M. Rønning, J. Yang, Core-shell nanostructures of graphene-wrapped CdS nanops and TiO2 (CdS@G@TiO2): the role of graphene in enhanced photocatalytic H2 generation. Catalysts 10, 358 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal10040358
  129. S. Bai, J. Ge, L. Wang, M. Gong, M. Deng et al., A unique semiconductor–metal–graphene stack design to harness charge flow for photocatalysis. Adv. Mater. 26, 5689–5695 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201401817
  130. D.V. Dao, G.D. Liberto, H. Ko, J. Park, W. Wang et al., LaFeO3 meets nitrogen-doped graphene functionalized with ultralow Pt loading in an impactful Z-scheme platform for photocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 10, 3330 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ta10376h
  131. X. Fan, G. Zhang, F. Zhang, Multiple roles of graphene in heterogeneous catalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44, 3023 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00094g
  132. X. Qu, Q. Hu, Z. Song, Z. Sun, B. Zhang et al., Adsorption and desorption mechanisms on graphene oxide nanosheets: Kinetics and tuning. The Innovation 2, 100137 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.xinn.2021.100137
  133. Y. Yang, M. Liu, S. Han, H. Xi, C. Xu et al., Double-sided modification of TiO2 spherical shell by graphene sheets with enhanced photocatalytic activity for CO2 reduction. Appl. Surf. Sci. 537, 147991 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.147991
  134. Y. Zhao, Y. Wei, X. Wu, H. Zheng, Z. Zhao et al., Graphene-wrapped Pt/TiO2 photocatalysts with enhanced photogenerated charges separation and reactant adsorption for high selective photoreduction of CO2 to CH4. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 226, 360–372 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2017.12.071
  135. M. Zhang, M. Wu, Z. Wang, R. Cheng, D.Y.C. Leung et al., Efficient sunlight driven CO2 reduction on Graphene-wrapped Cu-Pt/rTiO2@SiO2. Mater. Sci. Energy Technol. 3, 734–741 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mset.2020.09.001
  136. L. Pei, Y. Yuan, W. Bai, T. Li, H. Zhu et al., In situ-grown island-shaped hollow graphene on TaON with spatially separated active sites achieving enhanced visible-light CO2 reduction. ACS Catal. 10, 15083–15091 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c03918
  137. Y.-H. Chen, J.-K. Ye, Y.-J. Chang, T.-W. Liu, Y.-H. Chuang et al., Mechanisms behind photocatalytic CO2 reduction by CsPbBr3 perovskite-graphene-based nanoheterostructures. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 284, 119751 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119751
  138. P. Kumar, C. Joshi, A. Barras, B. Sieber, A. Addad et al., Core–shell structured reduced graphene oxide wrapped magnetically separable rGO@CuZnO@Fe3O4 microspheres as superior photocatalyst for CO2 reduction under visible light. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 205, 654–665 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2016.11.060
  139. L. Wang, H. Tan, L. Zhang, B. Cheng, J. Yu, In-situ growth of few-layer graphene on ZnO with intimate interfacial contact for enhanced photocatalytic CO2 reduction activity. Chem. Eng. J. 411, 128501 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.128501
  140. R. Guo, J. Wang, Z. Bi, X. Chen, X. Hu et al., Recent advances and perspectives of core-shell nanostructured materials for photocatalytic CO2 reduction. Small 19, 2206314 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202206314
  141. L. Qi, Z. Zheng, C. Xing, Z. Wang, X. Luan et al., 1D nanowire heterojunction electrocatalysts of MnCo2O4/GDY for efficient overall water splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2107179 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202107179
  142. H. Sun, C. Jing, W. Shang, F. Wang, M. Zeng et al., Polyoxometalate-based composite cluster with core–shell structure: Co4(PW9)2@graphdiyne as stable electrocatalyst for oxygen evolution and its mechanism research. New J. Chem. 46, 11553 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2nj01459a
  143. J. He, X. Miao, Y. Wu, Z. Jin, Phosphating core–shell graphdiyne/CuI/Cu3P S-scheme heterojunction confirmed with in situ XPS characterization for efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production. Catal. Sci. Technol. 13, 5610 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/d3cy00850a
  144. B. Zhai, H. Li, G. Gao, Y. Wang, P. Niu et al., A crystalline carbon nitride based near-infrared active photocatalyst. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32, 2207375 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202207375
  145. H. Wang, X. Liu, P. Niu, S. Wang, J. Shi et al., Porous two-dimensional materials for photocatalytic and electrocatalytic applications. Matter 2, 1377–1413 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2020.04.002
  146. H. de Lasa, B. Serrano, M. Salaices, Photocatalytic reaction engineering (Springer, New York, 2005)
  147. S. Barata-Vallejo, S.M. Bonesi, A. Postigo, Photocatalytic fluoroalkylation reactions of organic compounds. Org. Biomol. Chem. 13, 11153 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ob01486g
  148. F. Zhang, X. Wang, H. Liu, C. Liu, Y. Wan et al., Recent advances and applications of semiconductor photocatalytic technology. Appl. Sci. 9, 2489 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9122489
  149. J. Chen, J. Shi, X. Wang, H. Cui, M. Fu, Recent progress in the preparation and application of semiconductor/graphene composite photocatalysts. Chin. J. Catal. 34, 621–640 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-2067(12)60530-0
  150. Y. Guo, X. Tong, N. Yang, Photocatalytic and electrocatalytic generation of hydrogen peroxide: principles, catalyst design and performance. Nano-Micro Lett. 15, 77 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01052-2
  151. M.G. Lee, J.W. Yang, H. Park, C.W. Moon, D.M. Andoshe et al., Crystal facet engineering of TiO2 nanostructures for enhancing photoelectrochemical water splitting with BiVO4 nanodots. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 48 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00795-8
  152. P. Zhang, Y. Zhao, Y. Li, N. Li, S.R.P. Silva et al., Revealing the selective bifunctional electrocatalytic sites via in situ irradiated X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy for lithium–sulfur battery. Adv. Sci. 10, 2206786 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202206786
  153. Y. Li, Y. Zhang, R. Hou, Y. Ai, M. Cai et al., Revealing electron numbers-binding energy relationships in heterojunctions via in-situ irradiated XPS. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. Energy 356, 124223 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2024.124223
Read More
Author biographies are not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 1876 Download : 1411

Most read articles by the same author(s)