Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2010)

Rigid polyurethane foam reinforced with cellulose whiskers: Synthesis and characterization

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353624
Yang Li
School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, 500 10th St. N.W, Atlanta, GA 30332
Hongfeng Ren
School of Polymer, Textile and Fiber Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332, USA
Arthur J. Ragauskas
School of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Georgia Institute of Technology, 500 10th St. N.W, Atlanta, GA 30332

Corresponding Author: Arthur J. Ragauskas

arthur.ragauskas@chemistry.gatech.edu

Nano-Micro Letters, Vol. 2 No. 2 (2010), Article Number: 89-94

Abstract

A novel nanocomposite of rigid polyurethane foam was prepared by the polymerization of a sucrose-based polyol, a glycerol-based polyol and polymeric methylene diphenyl diisocyanate in the presence of cellulose whiskers. The cell morphology of the resulting foams was examined by scanning electron microscopy which showed both the pure foam and the nanocomposite foam had homogeneous cell dispersion and uniform cell size of approximately 200 μm. Analysis of the foams by Fourier transform infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy indicated that both samples exhibited signals attributed to the polyurethane including the NH stretching and bending vibrations at 3320 cm−1 and 1530 cm−1, the OC=O vibration at 1730 cm−1 and the CO-NH vibration at 1600 cm−1. FT-IR analysis of the nanocomposite indicated that cellulose whiskers were crosslinked with the polyurethane matrix as the signal intensity of the OH stretch at 3500 cm−1 was significantly reduced in comparison to the spectral data acquired for a control sample prepared from the pure polyurethane foam mixed with cellulose whiskers. According to ASTM standard testing procedures, the tensile modulus, tensile strength and yield strength of the nanocomposite foam were found to be improved by 36.8%, 13.8% and 15.2%, and the compressive modulus and strength were enhanced by 179.9% and 143.4%, respectively. Dynamic mechanical analysis results testified the improvements of mechanical properties and showed a better thermal stability of the nanocomposite foam.

Keywords

Nanocomposites Cellulose whiskers Tensile Compressive Thermal
Li, Yang, Hongfeng Ren, and Arthur J. Ragauskas. 2010. “Rigid Polyurethane Foam Reinforced With Cellulose Whiskers: Synthesis and Characterization”. Nano-Micro Letters 2 (2):89-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03353624.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. D. Klemm, B. Heublein, H. P. Fink and A. Bohn, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 44, 3358 (2005). doi:10.1002/anie.200460587.
  2. J. G. Zhang, T. J. Elder, Y. Pu and A. J. Ragauskas, Carbohydr. Polym. 69, 607 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2007.01.019.
  3. X. D. Cao, H. Dong and C. M. Li, Biomacromol. 8, 899 (2007). doi:10.1021/bm0610368.
  4. S. Harbaugh, N. K. Loughnane, M. Davidson, L. Narayanan, S. Trott, Y. G Chushak and M. O. Stone, Biomacromol. 6, 1055 (2005). doi:10.1021/bm049291k.
  5. M. A. S. A Samir, F. Alloin and A. Dufresne, Biomacromol. 6, 612 (2005). doi:10.1021/bm0493685.
  6. N. E. Marcovich, M. L. Auad, N. E. Bellesi, S. R. Nutt and M. I. Aranguren, J. Mater. Res. 21, 870 (2006). doi:10. 1557/jmr.2006.0105.
  7. Y. Pu, J. Zhang, T. Elder, Y. Deng, P. Gatenholm and A. J. Ragauskas, Compos. Part B 38, 360 (2007). doi:10.1016/j.compositesb.2006.07.008.
  8. M. A. S. A. Samir, F. Alloin, J. Y. Sanchez, N. E. Kissi and A. Dufresne, Macromolecules 37, 1386 (2004). doi:10.1021/ma030532a.
  9. M. O. Seydibeyoglu and K. Oksman, Compos. Sci. Technol. 68, 908 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2007.08.008.
  10. G. Siqueira, J. Bras and A. Dufresne, Biomacromolecules 10, 425 (2009).
  11. D. Randall, S. Lee, The Polyurethanes Book, Huntsman Polyurethanes, Belgium, 2002.
  12. C. A. Cateto, M.F. Barreiro, A. E. Rodrigues and M. N. Belgacem, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 48, 2583 (2009). doi:10.1021/ie801251r.
  13. T. U. Patro, G. Harikrishnan, A. Misra and D.V. Khakhar, Polym. Eng. Sci. 48, 1778 (2008). doi:10.1002/pen.21145.
  14. Z. B. Xu, X. L. Tang, A. J. Gu and Z. P. Fang, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 106, 439 (2007). doi:10.1002/app.26497.
  15. I. Banik and M. M. Sain, J. Reinf. Plast. Comp. 27, 357 (2008). doi:10.1177/0731684407083955.
  16. X. Cao, T. Widy, C. Macosko and L.J. Lee, Polymer 46, 775 (2005). doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2004.11.028.
  17. I. Banik and M. M. Sain, J. Reinf. Plast. Comp. 27, 1515 (2008). doi:10.1177/0731684407086317.
  18. I. Banik and M. M. Sain, J. Reinf. Plast. Comp. 27, 1745 (2008). doi:10.1177/0731684407081442.
  19. M. C. Saha, M. E. Kabir and S. Jeelani, Mat. Sci. Eng. A 479, 213 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.msea.2007.06.060.
  20. M. Modesti, A. Lorenzetti and S. Besco, Polym. Eng. Sci. 47, 1351 (2007). doi:10.1002/pen.20819.
  21. S. B. Candanedo, M. Roman and D.G. Gray, Biomacromolecules 62, 1048 (2005). doi:10.1021/ bm049300p.
  22. M. Thirumal, D. Khastgir, N. K. Singha, B. S. Manjunath and Y. P. Naik, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 108, 1810 (2008). doi:10.1002/app.27712.
  23. J. L. Rivera-Armenta, T. Heinze and A. M. Mendoza-Martinez, Eur. Polym. J. 40, 2803 (2004). doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2004.07.015.
  24. A. J. Birch. US Patent, 5451615, (1995).
  25. E. A. Turi, Thermal Characterization of Polymeric Materials, Academic Press, New York, 1997.
Read More
Author biographies are not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2547 Download : 1935

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>