Issue

Vol. 16 (2024)

Challenges and Opportunities in Preserving Key Structural Features of 3D-Printed Metal/Covalent Organic Framework

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-024-01373-w
Ximeng Liu
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117574, Singapore
Dan Zhao
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117585, Singapore
John Wang
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117574, Singapore

Corresponding Author: John Wang

msewangj@nus.edu.sg

Nano-Micro Letters, Vol. 16 (2024), Article Number: 157

Abstract

Metal–organic framework (MOF) and covalent organic framework (COF) are a huge group of advanced porous materials exhibiting attractive and tunable microstructural features, such as large surface area, tunable pore size, and functional surfaces, which have significant values in various application areas. The emerging 3D printing technology further provides MOF and COFs (M/COFs) with higher designability of their macrostructure and demonstrates large achievements in their performance by shaping them into advanced 3D monoliths. However, the currently available 3D printing M/COFs strategy faces a major challenge of severe destruction of M/COFs’ microstructural features, both during and after 3D printing. It is envisioned that preserving the microstructure of M/COFs in the 3D-printed monolith will bring a great improvement to the related applications. In this overview, the 3D-printed M/COFs are categorized into M/COF-mixed monoliths and M/COF-covered monoliths. Their differences in the properties, applications, and current research states are discussed. The up-to-date advancements in paste/scaffold composition and printing/covering methods to preserve the superior M/COF microstructure during 3D printing are further discussed for the two types of 3D-printed M/COF. Throughout the analysis of the current states of 3D-printed M/COFs, the expected future research direction to achieve a highly preserved microstructure in the 3D monolith is proposed.


Highlights:
1 A comprehensive investigation on the research states of 3D-printed metal/covalent organic frameworks (M/COFs) is conducted with the discussion on the M/COF-mixed monolith and M/COF-covered monolith separately.
2 Recent advances in design strategies regarding both the paste/scaffold formation and the 3D-printing/covering process for preserving the better structural features of M/COFs (surface area, porosity, and micromorphology) in their 3D printed monolith are overviewed and discussed.

Keywords

Metal–organic frameworks Covalent organic frameworks 3D printing Microstructure Monolith
Liu, Ximeng, Dan Zhao, and John Wang. 2024. “Challenges and Opportunities in Preserving Key Structural Features of 3D-Printed Metal/Covalent Organic Framework”. Nano-Micro Letters 16 (March):157. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-024-01373-w.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. Y. Cao, R. Wu, Y.-Y. Gao, Y. Zhou, J.-J. Zhu, Advances of electrochemical and electrochemiluminescent sensors based on covalent organic frameworks. Nano-Micro Lett. 16, 37 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01249-5
  2. J. Chang, C. Li, X. Wang, D. Li, J. Zhang et al., Quasi-three-dimensional cyclotriphosphazene-based covalent organic framework nanosheet for efficient oxygen reduction. Nano-Micro Lett. 15, 159 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01111-8
  3. X. Qi, K. Liu, Z. Chang, Beyond powders: monoliths on the basis of metal-organic frameworks (MOFs). Chem. Eng. J. 441, 135953 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.135953
  4. T. Xue, Y. Yang, D. Yu, Q. Wali, Z. Wang et al., 3D printed integrated gradient-conductive MXene/CNT/polyimide aerogel frames for electromagnetic interference shielding with ultra-low reflection. Nano-Micro Lett. 15, 45 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01017-5
  5. J. Li, M. Li, J.J. Koh, J. Wang, Z. Lyu, 3D-printed biomimetic structures for energy and environmental applications. DeCarbon 3, 100026 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.decarb.2023.100026
  6. W.Y. Lieu, D. Fang, K.J. Tay, X.L. Li, W.C. Chu et al., Progress on 3D-printed metal-organic frameworks with hierarchical structures. Adv. Mater. Technol. 7, 2200023 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.202200023
  7. Y. Li, G. Wen, J. Li, Q. Li, H. Zhang et al., Synthesis and shaping of metal–organic frameworks: a review. Chem. Commun. 58, 11488–11506 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2cc04190a
  8. D. Pianca, M. Carboni, D. Meyer, 3D-printing of porous materials: application to metal-organic frameworks. Mater. Lett. X 13, 100121 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mlblux.2022.100121
  9. J.B. Kim, H.Y. Lee, C. Chae, S.Y. Lee, S.H. Kim, Advanced additive manufacturing of structurally-colored architectures. Adv. Mater. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202307917
  10. L. Zeng, S. Ling, D. Du, H. He, X. Li et al., Direct ink writing 3D printing for high-performance electrochemical energy storage devices: a minireview. Adv. Sci. 10, e2303716 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202303716
  11. A. Shahzad, I. Lazoglu, Direct ink writing (DIW) of structural and functional ceramics: recent achievements and future challenges. Compos. Part B Eng. 225, 109249 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109249
  12. M.A.S.R. Saadi, A. Maguire, N.T. Pottackal, M.S.H. Thakur, M.M. Ikram et al., Direct ink writing: a 3D printing technology for diverse materials. Adv. Mater. 34, 2108855 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202108855
  13. J. Dhainaut, M. Bonneau, R. Ueoka, K. Kanamori, S. Furukawa, Formulation of metal–organic framework inks for the 3D printing of robust microporous solids toward high-pressure gas storage and separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 10983–10992 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b22257
  14. R. Zhou, Y. Wang, Z. Liu, Y. Pang, J. Chen et al., Digital light processing 3D-printed ceramic metamaterials for electromagnetic wave absorption. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 122 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00865-x
  15. E. Lahtinen, R.L.M. Precker, M. Lahtinen, E. Hey-Hawkins, M. Haukka, Selective laser sintering of metal-organic frameworks: production of highly porous filters by 3D printing onto a polymeric matrix. ChemPlusChem 84, 222–225 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/cplu.201900081
  16. G. Lipkowitz, T. Samuelsen, K. Hsiao, B. Lee, M.T. Dulay et al., Injection continuous liquid interface production of 3D objects. Sci. Adv. 8, eabq3917 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abq3917
  17. N.M. Larson, J. Mueller, A. Chortos, Z.S. Davidson, D.R. Clarke et al., Rotational multimaterial printing of filaments with subvoxel control. Nature 613, 682–688 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05490-7
  18. M.A. Skylar-Scott, J. Mueller, C.W. Visser, J.A. Lewis, Voxelated soft matter via multimaterial multinozzle 3D printing. Nature 575, 330–335 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1736-8
  19. Z. Ren, L. Gao, S.J. Clark, K. Fezzaa, P. Shevchenko et al., Machine learning-aided real-time detection of keyhole pore generation in laser powder bed fusion. Science 379, 89–94 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.add4667
  20. Z. Lyu, J. Wang, Y. Chen, 4D printing: interdisciplinary integration of smart materials, structural design, and new functionality. Int. J. Extrem. Manuf. 5, 032011 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1088/2631-7990/ace090
  21. Z. Lyu, J.J. Koh, G.J.H. Lim, D. Zhang, T. Xiong et al., Direct ink writing of programmable functional silicone-based composites for 4D printing applications. Interdiscip. Mater. 1, 507–516 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/idm2.12027
  22. N. Maldonado, P. Amo-Ochoa, New promises and opportunities in 3D printable inks based on coordination compounds for the creation of objects with multiple applications. Chemistry 27, 2887–2907 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202002259
  23. S. Mallakpour, E. Azadi, C.M. Hussain, MOF/COF-based materials using 3D printing technology: applications in water treatment, gas removal, biomedical, and electronic industries. New J. Chem. 45, 13247–13257 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/D1NJ02152D
  24. E.R. Kearns, R. Gillespie, D.M. D’Alessandro, 3D printing of metal–organic framework composite materials for clean energy and environmental applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 9, 27252–27270 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ta08777k
  25. C.T. Hsieh, K. Ariga, L.K. Shrestha, S.H. Hsu, Development of MOF reinforcement for structural stability and toughness enhancement of biodegradable bioinks. Biomacromol 22, 1053–1064 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00920
  26. L. Zhang, G. Ng, N. Kapoor-Kaushik, X. Shi, N. Corrigan et al., 2D porphyrinic metal-organic framework nanosheets as multidimensional photocatalysts for functional materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 22664–22671 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202107457
  27. C. Li, S. Deng, W. Feng, Y. Cao, J. Bai et al., A universal room-temperature 3D printing approach towards porous mof based dendrites inhibition hybrid solid-state electrolytes. Small 19, e2300066 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202300066
  28. W. Zhu, Z. Zhou, Y. Huang, H. Liu, N. He et al., A versatile 3D-printable hydrogel for antichondrosarcoma, antibacterial, and tissue repair. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 136, 200–211 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2022.07.010
  29. S. Pal, Y.-Z. Su, Y.-W. Chen, C.-H. Yu, C.-W. Kung et al., 3D printing of metal-organic framework-based ionogels: wearable sensors with colorimetric and mechanical responses. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 28247–28257 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c02690
  30. A.I. Cherevko, I.A. Nikovskiy, Y.V. Nelyubina, K.M. Skupov, N.N. Efimov et al., 3D-printed porous magnetic carbon materials derived from metal-organic frameworks. Polymers 13, 3881 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/polym13223881
  31. A.K. Mohammed, S. Usgaonkar, F. Kanheerampockil, S. Karak, A. Halder et al., Connecting microscopic structures, mesoscale assemblies, and macroscopic architectures in 3D-printed hierarchical porous covalent organic framework foams. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 142, 8252–8261 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c00555
  32. Z. Lyu, G.J.H. Lim, R. Guo, Z. Kou, T. Wang et al., 3D-printed MOF-derived hierarchically porous frameworks for practical high-energy density Li–O2 batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1806658 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201806658
  33. B. Yeskendir, J.-P. Dacquin, Y. Lorgouilloux, C. Courtois, S. Royer et al., From metal–organic framework powders to shaped solids: recent developments and challenges. Mater. Adv. 2, 7139–7186 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ma00630d
  34. S. Sultan, H.N. Abdelhamid, X. Zou, A.P. Mathew, CelloMOF: nanocellulose enabled 3D printing of metal–organic frameworks. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29, 1805372 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201805372
  35. A.D. Salazar-Aguilar, A. Quintanilla, P. López, C. Martínez, S.M. Vega-Díaz et al., 3D-printed Fe/γ-Al2O3 monoliths from MOF-based boehmite inks for the catalytic hydroxylation of phenol. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 920–932 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c19755
  36. K.A. Evans, Z.C. Kennedy, B.W. Arey, J.F. Christ, H.T. Schaef et al., Chemically active, porous 3D-printed thermoplastic composites. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 15112–15121 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b17565
  37. A. Pustovarenko, B. Seoane, E. Abou-Hamad, H.E. King, B.M. Weckhuysen et al., Rapid fabrication of MOF-based mixed matrix membranes through digital light processing. Mater. Adv. 2, 2739–2749 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/D1MA00023C
  38. H. Thakkar, S. Eastman, Q. Al-Naddaf, A.A. Rownaghi, F. Rezaei, 3D-printed metal–organic framework monoliths for gas adsorption processes. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9, 35908–35916 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b11626
  39. S. Lawson, M. Snarzyk, D. Hanify, A.A. Rownaghi, F. Rezaei, Development of 3D-printed polymer-MOF monoliths for CO2 adsorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 59, 7151–7160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b05445
  40. H. Thakkar, Q. Al-Naddaf, N. Legion, M. Hovis, A. Krishnamurthy et al., Adsorption of ethane and ethylene over 3D-printed ethane-selective monoliths. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 6, 15228–15237 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b03685
  41. J. Lefevere, B. Claessens, S. Mullens, G. Baron, J. Cousin-Saint-Remi et al., 3D-printed zeolitic imidazolate framework structures for adsorptive separations. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2, 4991–4999 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b00934
  42. B. Claessens, N. Dubois, J. Lefevere, S. Mullens, J. Cousin-Saint-Remi et al., 3D-printed ZIF-8 monoliths for biobutanol recovery. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 59, 8813–8824 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.0c00453
  43. Z. Lyu, G.J.H. Lim, R. Guo, Z. Pan, X. Zhang et al., 3D-printed electrodes for lithium metal batteries with high areal capacity and high-rate capability. Energy Storage Mater. 24, 336–342 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2019.07.041
  44. M.N. Channell, M. Sefa, J.A. Fedchak, J. Scherschligt, M. Bible et al., Toward 3D printed hydrogen storage materials made with ABS-MOF composites. Polym. Adv. Technol. 29, 867–873 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/pat.4197
  45. L. Zhong, J. Chen, Z. Ma, H. Feng, S. Chen et al., 3D printing of metal-organic framework incorporated porous scaffolds to promote osteogenic differentiation and bone regeneration. Nanoscale 12, 24437–24449 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0nr06297a
  46. P. Pei, Z. Tian, Y. Zhu, 3D printed mesoporous bioactive glass/metal-organic framework scaffolds with antitubercular drug delivery. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 272, 24–30 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2018.06.012
  47. F. Zou, J. Jiang, F. Lv, X. Xia, X. Ma, Preparation of antibacterial and osteoconductive 3D-printed PLGA/Cu(I)@ZIF-8 nanocomposite scaffolds for infected bone repair. J. Nanobiotechnology 18, 39 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-020-00594-6
  48. R. Pei, L. Fan, F. Zhao, J. Xiao, Y. Yang et al., 3D-Printed metal-organic frameworks within biocompatible polymers as excellent adsorbents for organic dyes removal. J. Hazard. Mater. 384, 121418 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121418
  49. C.A. Grande, R. Blom, V. Middelkoop, D. Matras, A. Vamvakeros et al., Multiscale investigation of adsorption properties of novel 3D printed UTSA-16 structures. Chem. Eng. J. 402, 126166 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126166
  50. L. Zhang, X. Shi, Z. Zhang, R.P. Kuchel, R. Namivandi-Zangeneh et al., Porphyrinic zirconium metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) as heterogeneous photocatalysts for PET-RAFT polymerization and stereolithography. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 5489–5496 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202014208
  51. T. Wu, Z. Ma, Y. He, X. Wu, B. Tang et al., A covalent black phosphorus/metal-organic framework hetero-nanostructure for high-performance flexible supercapacitors. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 10366–10374 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202101648
  52. J. Zhao, Y. Zhang, H. Lu, Y. Wang, X.D. Liu et al., Additive manufacturing of two-dimensional conductive metal-organic framework with multidimensional hybrid architectures for high-performance energy storage. Nano Lett. 22, 1198–1206 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c04367
  53. A.J. Young, R. Guillet-Nicolas, E.S. Marshall, F. Kleitz, A.J. Goodhand et al., Direct ink writing of catalytically active UiO-66 polymer composites. Chem. Commun. 55, 2190–2193 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8CC10018G
  54. G.J.H. Lim, Y. Wu, B.B. Shah, J.J. Koh, C.K. Liu et al., 3D-printing of pure metal–organic framework monoliths. ACS Mater. Lett. 1, 147–153 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.9b00069
  55. Y. Liu, J. Yang, C. Tao, H. Lee, M. Chen et al., Meniscus-guided 3D microprinting of pure metal–organic frameworks with high gas-uptake performance. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 7184–7191 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c22582
  56. M. Zhang, L. Li, Q. Lin, M. Tang, Y. Wu et al., Hierarchical-coassembly-enabled 3D-printing of homogeneous and heterogeneous covalent organic frameworks. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141, 5154–5158 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b01561
  57. H.N. Abdelhamid, S. Sultan, A.P. Mathew, 3D printing of cellulose/leaf-like zeolitic imidazolate frameworks (CelloZIF-L) for adsorption of carbon dioxide (CO2) and heavy metal ions. Dalton Trans. 52, 2988–2998 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2dt04168e
  58. P. Scholz, A. Ulbricht, Y. Joshi, C. Gollwitzer, S.M. Weidner, Microstructure of polymer-imprinted metal–organic frameworks determined by absorption edge tomography. Int. J. Mater. Res. 111, 55–64 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3139/146.111817
  59. B. Chen, R. Davies, H. Chang, Y. Xia, Y. Zhu et al., In-situ synthesis of metal organic frameworks (MOFs)-PA12 powders and their laser sintering into hierarchical porous lattice structures. Addit. Manuf. 38, 101774 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101774
  60. S. Lawson, A.-A. Alwakwak, A.A. Rownaghi, F. Rezaei, Gel–print–grow: a new way of 3D printing metal–organic frameworks. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 56108–56117 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c18720
  61. C. Xu, Y. Ai, T. Zheng, C. Wang, Acoustic manipulation of breathing MOFs ps for self-folding composite films preparation. Sens. Actuat. A Phys. 315, 112288 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2020.112288
  62. R. Li, S. Yuan, W. Zhang, H. Zheng, W. Zhu et al., 3D printing of mixed matrix films based on metal-organic frameworks and thermoplastic polyamide 12 by selective laser sintering for water applications. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11, 40564–40574 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.9b11840
  63. X. Liu, G.J.H. Lim, Y. Wang, L. Zhang, D. Mullangi et al., Binder-free 3D printing of covalent organic framework (COF) monoliths for CO2 adsorption. Chem. Eng. J. 403, 126333 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126333
  64. S. Lawson, C. Griffin, K. Rapp, A.A. Rownaghi, F. Rezaei, Amine-functionalized MIL-101 monoliths for CO2 removal from enclosed environments. Energy Fuels 33, 2399–2407 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b04508
  65. T. Ni, Y. Zhu, L. Hao, Y. Chen, T. Cheng, Preparation of photothermal-sensitive PDGF@ZIF-8-PDA@COL/PLGA-TCP composite scaffolds for bone defect repair. Mater. Des. 217, 110643 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2022.110643
  66. R. Yang, C. Fan, Y. Dou, X. Zhang, Z. Xu et al., 3D printing stiff antibacterial hydrogels for meniscus replacement. Appl. Mater. Today 24, 101089 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101089
  67. Z. Liu, X. Xia, W. Li, L. Xiao, X. Sun et al., In situ growth of Ca2+-based metal-organic framework on CaSiO3/ABS/TPU 3D skeleton for methylene blue removal. Materials 13, 4403 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13194403
  68. J. Yao, F. Dong, X. Xu, M. Wen, Z. Ji et al., Rational design and construction of monolithic ordered mesoporous Co3O4@SiO2 catalyst by a novel 3D printed technology for catalytic oxidation of toluene. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 22170–22185 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c03850
  69. J. Huang, P. Wu, Controlled assembly of luminescent lanthanide-organic frameworks via post-treatment of 3D-printed objects. Nano-Micro Lett. 13, 15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-020-00543-w
  70. W. Liu, O. Erol, D.H. Gracias, 3D printing of an In situ grown MOF hydrogel with tunable mechanical properties. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12, 33267–33275 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c08880
  71. I. Pellejero, F. Almazán, M. Lafuente, M.A. Urbiztondo, M. Drobek et al., Functionalization of 3D printed ABS filters with MOF for toxic gas removal. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 89, 194–203 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiec.2020.05.013
  72. S. Waheed, M. Rodas, H. Kaur, N.L. Kilah, B. Paull et al., In-situ growth of metal-organic frameworks in a reactive 3D printable material. Appl. Mater. Today 22, 100930 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100930
  73. Z. Shi, C. Xu, F. Chen, Y. Wang, L. Li et al., Renewable metal–organic-frameworks-coated 3D printing film for removal of malachite green. RSC Adv. 7, 49947–49952 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RA10912A
  74. J. Du, W. Liu, Z. Kang, B. Yu, D. Li et al., Hydrothermal deposition of PCN-224 on 3D-printed porous β-Ca2SiO4 scaffolds for bone regeneration. Adv. Eng. Mater. 24, 2101550 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adem.202101550
  75. C. Shu, C. Qin, L. Chen, Y. Wang, Z. Shi et al., Metal-organic framework functionalized bioceramic scaffolds with antioxidative activity for enhanced osteochondral regeneration. Adv. Sci. 10, e2206875 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202206875
  76. Y. Ying, M.P. Browne, M. Pumera, Metal–organic-frameworks on 3D-printed electrodes: in situ electrochemical transformation towards the oxygen evolution reaction. Sustain. Energy Fuels 4, 3732–3738 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0se00503g
  77. J. Dong, P. Li, H. Guan, C. Ge, Y. Bai et al., The synthesis of HKUST-1/SiO2 composite material based on 3D printing. Inorg. Chem. Commun. 117, 107975 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inoche.2020.107975
  78. S. Lawson, Q. Al-Naddaf, A. Krishnamurthy, M.S. Amour, C. Griffin et al., UTSA-16 growth within 3D-printed co-Kaolin monoliths with high selectivity for CO2/CH4, CO2/N2, and CO2/H2 separation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10, 19076–19086 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b05192
  79. D. Liu, P. Jiang, X. Li, J. Liu, L. Zhou et al., 3D printing of metal-organic frameworks decorated hierarchical porous ceramics for high-efficiency catalytic degradation. Chem. Eng. J. 397, 125392 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125392
  80. L. Wang, W. Gao, S. Ng, M. Pumera, Chiral protein-covalent organic framework 3D-printed structures as chiral biosensors. Anal. Chem. 93, 5277–5283 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.1c00322
  81. K. Li, Y. de Rancourt, X. de Mimérand, J. Jin, J.G. Yi, Metal oxide (ZnO and TiO2) and Fe-based metal–organic-framework nanops on 3D-printed fractal polymer surfaces for photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 3, 2830–2845 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.0c00096
  82. M. del Rio, M. Villar, S. Quesada, G.T. Palomino, L. Ferrer et al., Silver-functionalized UiO-66 metal-organic framework-coated 3D printed device for the removal of radioactive iodine from wastewaters. Appl. Mater. Today 24, 101130 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2021.101130
  83. A. Figuerola, D.A.V. Medina, A.J. Santos-Neto, C.P. Cabello, V. Cerdà et al., Metal–organic framework mixed-matrix coatings on 3D printed devices. Appl. Mater. Today 16, 21–27 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2019.04.011
  84. H.S. Far, M. Najafi, M. Hasanzadeh, M. Rabbani, Self-supported 3D-printed lattices containing MXene/metal–organic framework (MXOF) composite as an efficient adsorbent for wastewater treatment. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14, 44488–44497 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c13830
  85. W. Wang, Y. Xiong, R. Zhao, X. Li, W. Jia, A novel hierarchical biofunctionalized 3D-printed porous Ti6Al4V scaffold with enhanced osteoporotic osseointegration through osteoimmunomodulation. J. Nanobiotechnology 20, 68 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12951-022-01277-0
  86. H.S. Far, M. Najafi, M. Hasanzadeh, R. Rahimi, A 3D-printed hierarchical porous architecture of MOF@clay composite for rapid and highly efficient dye scavenging. New J. Chem. 46, 23351–23360 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/D2NJ05188E
  87. Y. Jiang, X. Pan, M. Yao, L. Han, X. Zhang et al., Bioinspired adhesive and tumor microenvironment responsive nanoMOFs assembled 3D-printed scaffold for anti-tumor therapy and bone regeneration. Nano Today 39, 101182 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NANTOD.2021.101182
  88. Q. Xu, Z. Chen, Y. Zhang, X. Hu, F. Chen et al., Mussel-inspired bioactive 3D-printable poly(styrene-butadiene-styrene) and the in vitro assessment of its potential as cranioplasty implants. J. Mater. Chem. B 10, 3747–3758 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2tb00419d
  89. S. Yuan, J. Zhu, Y. Li, Y. Zhao, J. Li et al., Structure architecture of micro/nanoscale ZIF-L on a 3D printed membrane for a superhydrophobic and underwater superoleophobic surface. J. Mater. Chem. A 7, 2723–2729 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TA10249J
  90. Z. Wang, J. Wang, M. Li, K. Sun, C.-J. Liu, Three-dimensional printed acrylonitrile butadiene styrene framework coated with Cu-BTC metal-organic frameworks for the removal of methylene blue. Sci. Rep. 4, 5939 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep05939
  91. W. Dang, B. Ma, B. Li, Z. Huan, N. Ma et al., 3D printing of metal-organic framework nanosheets-structured scaffolds with tumor therapy and bone construction. Biofabrication 12, 025005 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1088/1758-5090/ab5ae3
  92. R. Singh, G. Souillard, L. Chassat, Y. Gao, X. Mulet et al., Fabricating bioactive 3D metal–organic framework devices. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 4, 2000059 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adsu.202000059
  93. L. Wang, S. Ng, Jyoti, M. Pumera, Al2O3/covalent organic framework on 3D-printed nanocarbon electrodes for enhanced biomarker detection. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 5, 9719–9727 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.2c01937
  94. M. Li, Y. Wei, B. Ma, Y. Hu, D. Li et al., Synthesis and antibacterial properties of ZIF-8/Ag-modified titanium alloy. J. Bionic Eng. 19, 507–515 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42235-021-00135-3
Read More
Author biographies are not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 2875 Download : 2165

Most read articles by the same author(s)