Issue

Vol. 12 (2020)

Nano-/Micro-confined Water in Graphene Hydrogel as Superadsorbents for Water Purification

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-019-0336-3
Yiran Sun
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, People’s Republic of China
Fei Yu
College of Marine Ecology and Environment, Shanghai Ocean University, Shanghai 201306, People’s Republic of China
Cong Li
Department of Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering, The University of Akron, Akron, OH 44325, USA
Xiaohu Dai
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, People’s Republic of China
Jie Ma
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, College of Environmental Science and Engineering, Tongji University, 1239 Siping Road, Shanghai 200092, People’s Republic of China

Corresponding Author: Jie Ma

jma@tongji.edu.cn

Nano-Micro Letters, Vol. 12 (2020), Article Number: 2

Abstract

Confined water has been proven to be of great importance due to its pervasiveness and contribution to life and many fields of scientific research. However, the control and characterization of confined water are a challenge. Herein, a confined space is constructed by flexibly changing the pH of a graphene oxide dispersion under the self-assembly process of a graphene hydrogel (GH), and the confined space is adjusted with variation from 10.04 to 3.52 nm. Confined water content in GH increases when the pore diameter of the confined space decreases; the corresponding adsorption capacity increases from 243.04 to 442.91 mg g−1. Moreover, attenuated total reflectance Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and Raman spectroscopy are utilized to analyze the hydrogen bonding structure qualitatively and quantitatively, and correlation analysis reveals that the improvement in the adsorption capacity is caused by incomplete hydrogen bonding in the confined water. Further, confined water is assembled into four typical porous commercial adsorbents, and a remarkable enhancement of the adsorption capacity is achieved. This research demonstrates the application potential for the extraordinary properties of confined water and has implications for the development of highly effective confined water-modified adsorbents.


Highlights
1 Confined space/water in graphene hydrogel was constructed and controlled.
2 Adsorption capacity of porous adsorbents was enhanced by filling confined water.
3 Incomplete hydrogen bonding in confined water contributes to adsorption.

Keywords

Confined water Graphene hydrogel Hydrogen bonding Adsorption Antibiotic
Sun, Yiran, Fei Yu, Cong Li, Xiaohu Dai, and Jie Ma. 2019. “Nano-/Micro-Confined Water in Graphene Hydrogel As Superadsorbents for Water Purification”. Nano-Micro Letters 12 (December):2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-019-0336-3.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. X. Zhang, H. Qian, H. Wu, J. Chen, L. Qiao, Multivariate analysis of confined groundwater hydrochemistry of a long-exploited sedimentary basin in northwest china. J. Chem. 1, 3812125 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3812125
  2. S. Toda, S. Shigeto, Hydrogen bonded structures of confined water molecules and electric field induced shift of their equilibrium revealed by IR electroabsorption spectroscopy. J. Phys. Chem. B 121, 5573–5581 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.7b02171
  3. M.F. Chaplin, Structuring and behaviour of water in nanochannels and confined spaces, in Adsorption and Phase Behaviour in Nanochannels and Nanotubes. (Springer, Dordrecht, 2010), pp. 241–255
  4. Google Scholar
  5. N. Kastelowitz, V. Molinero, Ice-liquid oscillations in nanoconfined water. ACS Nano 12, 8234–8239 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.8b03403
  6. H. Qiu, M. Xue, C. Shen, W. Guo, Anomalous cation diffusion in salt-doped confined bilayer ice. Nanoscale 10, 8962–8968 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR01301B
  7. S. Chakraborty, H. Kumar, C. Dasgupta, P.K. Maiti, Confined water: structure, dynamics, and thermodynamics. Acc Chem. Res. 50, 2139–2146 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.6b00617
  8. M. Weik, Low-temperature behavior of water confined by biological macromolecules and its relation to protein dynamics. Eur. Phys. J. E 12, 153–158 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1140/epje/i2003-10043-5
  9. K.V. Agrawal, S. Shimizu, L.W. Drahushuk, D. Kilcoyne, M.S. Strano, Observation of extreme phase transition temperatures of water confined inside isolated carbon nanotubes. Nat. Nanotechnol. 12, 267 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2016.254
  10. J. Muscatello, F. Jaeger, O.K. Matar, E.A. Mueller, Optimizing water transport through graphene-based membranes: insights from nonequilibrium molecular dynamics. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 8, 12330–12336 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b12112
  11. Y.R. Sun, F. Yu, J. Ma, Research progress of nanoconfined water. Acta Phys.-Chim. Sin. 33, 2173–2183 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201705312
  12. G. Algara-Siller, O. Lehtinen, F.C. Wang, R.R. Nair, U. Kaiser, H.A. Wu, A.K. Geim, I.V. Grigorieva, Square ice in graphene nanocapillaries. Nature 519, 443–445 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14295
  13. B. Radha, A. Esfandiar, F.C. Wang, A.P. Rooney, K. Gopinadhan et al., Molecular transport through capillaries made with atomic-scale precision. Nature 538, 222–225 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature19363
  14. J. Ma, Y. Ma, F. Yu, in Nanotechnology for Sustainable Water Resources, ed. by A.K. Mishra, C.M. Hussain (Wiley, 2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119323655.ch11
  15. Google Scholar
  16. X. Li, W. Xu, M. Tang, L. Zhou, B. Zhu, S. Zhu, J. Zhu, Graphene oxide-based efficient and scalable solar desalination under one sun with a confined 2D water path. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13953–13958 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1613031113
  17. M. Zhao, X. Yang, Segregation structures and miscellaneous diffusions for ethanol/water mixtures in graphene-based nanoscale pores. J. Phys. Chem. C 119, 21664–21673 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b03307
  18. Y. Suzuki, M. Steinhart, R. Graf, H.-J. Butt, G. Floudas, Dynamics of ice/water confined in nanoporous alumina. J. Phys. Chem. B 119, 14814–14820 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcb.5b08751
  19. N.E. Levinger, Water in confinement. Science 298, 1722–1723 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1079322
  20. F. Mozaffari, A molecular dynamics simulation study of the effect of water-graphene interaction on the properties of confined water. Mol. Simul. 42, 1475–1484 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/08927022.2016.1204659
  21. J. Marti, J. Sala, E. Guardia, M.C. Gordillo, Molecular dynamics simulations of supercritical water confined within a carbon-slit pore. Phys. Rev. E 79, 031606 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.79.031606
  22. J. Swenson, H. Jansson, R. Bergman, Relaxation processes in supercooled confined water and implications for protein dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 247802 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.247802
  23. X. Yang, J. Zhu, L. Qiu, D. Li, Bioinspired effective prevention of restacking in multilayered graphene films: towards the next generation of high-performance supercapacitors. Adv. Mater. 23, 2833–2838 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201100261
  24. J. Ma, Y. Sun, M. Zhang, M. Yang, X. Gong, F. Yu, J. Zheng, Comparative study of graphene hydrogels and aerogels reveals the important role of buried water in pollutant adsorption. Environ. Sci. Technol. 51, 12283–12292 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.7b02227
  25. X.-H. Zhu, C.-X. Yang, X.-P. Yan, Metal-organic framework-801 for efficient removal of fluoride from water. Microp. Mesop. Mater. 259, 163–170 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2017.10.001
  26. A.W. Marczewski, Application of mixed order rate equations to adsorption of methylene blue on mesoporous carbons. Appl. Surf. Sci. 256, 5145–5152 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2009.12.078
  27. S.A.C. Carabineiro, T. Thavorn-Amornsri, M.F.R. Pereira, P. Serp, J.L. Figueiredo, Comparison between activated carbon, carbon xerogel and carbon nanotubes for the adsorption of the antibiotic ciprofloxacin. Catal. Today 186, 29–34 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2011.08.020
  28. C.d.O. Carvalho, D.L. Costa Rodrigues, E.C. Lima, C.S. Umpierres, D.F. Caicedo Chaguezac, F.M. Machado, Kinetic, equilibrium, and thermodynamic studies on the adsorption of ciprofloxacin by activated carbon produced from Jeriva (Syagrus romanzoffiana). Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 26, 4690–4702 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-3954-2
  29. N. Genc, E.C. Dogan, Adsorption kinetics of the antibiotic ciprofloxacin on bentonite, activated carbon, zeolite, and pumice. Desalin. Water Treat. 53, 785–793 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.842504
  30. L. Huang, M. Wang, C. Shi, J. Huang, B. Zhang, Adsorption of tetracycline and ciprofloxacin on activated carbon prepared from lignin with H3PO4 activation. Desalin. Water Treat. 52, 2678–2687 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1080/19443994.2013.833873
  31. S.A.C. Carabineiro, T. Thavorn-Amornsri, M.F.R. Pereira, J.L. Figueiredo, Adsorption of ciprofloxacin on surface-modified carbon materials. Water Res. 45, 4583–4591 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.06.008
  32. D. Wu, C. Nie, J. Xu, C. Zhao, F. Tan et al., Enhancement of ciprofloxacin removal by modifying activated carbon (AC-S) derived from corn stalks with novel silage pre-treatment. Desalin. Water Treat. 87, 268–276 (2017). https://doi.org/10.5004/dwt.2017.21261
  33. M.C. Gordillo, J. Marti, Hydrogen bond structure of liquid water confined in nanotubes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 329, 341–345 (2000). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(00)01032-0
  34. C.-K. Sun, B. You, Y.-R. Huang, K.-H. Liu, S. Sato, A. Irisawa, M. Imamura, C.-Y. Mou, Pore-size dependent THz absorption of nano-confined water. Opt. Lett. 40, 2731–2734 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1364/OL.40.002731
  35. M.S. Fernandez, F.M. Peeters, M. Neek-Amal, Electric-field-induced structural changes in water confined between two graphene layers. Phys. Rev. B 94, 045436 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.045436
  36. J. Ma, C. Li, F. Yu, J. Chen, “Brick-like” N-doped graphene/carbon nanotube structure forming three-dimensional films as high performance metal-free counter electrodes in dye-sensitized solar cells. J. Power Sour. 273, 1048–1055 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.10.003
  37. L.M. Malard, M.A. Pimenta, G. Dresselhaus, M.S. Dresselhaus, Raman spectroscopy in graphene. Phys. Rep.-Rev. Sect. Phys. Lett. 473, 51–87 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.02.003
  38. S. Stankovich, R.D. Piner, S.T. Nguyen, R.S. Ruoff, Synthesis and exfoliation of isocyanate-treated graphene oxide nanoplatelets. Carbon 44, 3342–3347 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2006.06.004
  39. L. Stobinski, B. Lesiak, A. Malolepszy, M. Mazurkiewicz, B. Mierzwa, J. Zemek, P. Jiricek, I. Bieloshapka, Graphene oxide and reduced graphene oxide studied by the XRD, TEM and electron spectroscopy methods. J. Electron Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 195, 145–154 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elspec.2014.07.003
  40. G.H. Findenegg, S. Jaehnert, D. Akcakayiran, A. Schreiber, Freezing and melting of water confined in silica nanopores. ChemPhysChem 9, 2651–2659 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.200800616
  41. D. Kojic, R. Tsenkova, K. Tomobe, K. Yasuoka, M. Yasui, Water confined in the local field of ions. ChemPhysChem 15, 4077–4086 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1002/cphc.201402381
  42. S.D. Bernardina, E. Paineau, J.-B. Brubach, P. Judeinstein, S. Rouziere, P. Launois, P. Roy, Water in carbon nanotubes: the peculiar hydrogen bond network revealed by infrared spectroscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138, 10437–10443 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b02635
  43. N. Goldman, R.J. Saykally, Elucidating the role of many-body forces in liquid water. I. Simulations of water clusters on the VRT(ASP-W) potential surfaces. J. Chem. Phys. 120, 4777–4789 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1645777
  44. P.A. Giguere, The bifurcated hydrogen-bond model of water and amorphous ice. J. Chem. Phys. 87, 4835–4839 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.452845
  45. V. Crupi, S. Interdonato, F. Longo, D. Majolino, P. Migliardo, V. Venuti, New insight on the hydrogen bonding structures of nanoconfined water: a Raman study. J. Raman Spectrosc. 39, 244–249 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1002/jrs.1857
  46. V. Crupi, A. Fontana, D. Majolino, A. Mele, L. Melone et al., Hydrogen-bond dynamics of water confined in cyclodextrin nanosponges hydrogel. J. Incl. Phenom. Macrocycl. Chem. 80, 69–75 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10847-014-0387-5
  47. C.M. Santos, M.C.R. Tria, R.A.M.V. Vergara, F. Ahmed, R.C. Advincula, D.F. Rodrigues, Antimicrobial graphene polymer (PVK-GO) nanocomposite films. Chem. Commun. 47, 8892–8894 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/C1CC11877C
  48. J. Liu, W. Yang, L. Tao, D. Li, C. Boyer, T.P. Davis, Thermosensitive graphene nanocomposites formed using pyrene-terminal polymers made by RAFT polymerization. J. Polym. Sci. A-Polym. Chem. 48, 425–433 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/pola.23802
  49. F.G. Alabarse, J. Haines, O. Cambon, C. Levelut, D. Bourgogne, A. Haidoux, D. Granier, B. Coasne, Freezing of water confined at the nanoscale. Phys. Rev. Lett. 109, 035701 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.109.035701
  50. J. Ma, M. Yang, F. Yu, J. Zheng, Water-enhanced removal of ciprofloxacin from water by porous graphene hydrogel. Sci. Rep. 5, 13578 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13578
  51. J. Ma, Y. Sun, F. Yu, Self-assembly and controllable synthesis of graphene hydrogel adsorbents with enhanced removal of ciprofloxacin from aqueous solutions. RSC Adv. 6, 83982–83993 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA19474E
Read More
Author biographies are not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL
Statistic
Read Counter : 5217 Download : 3943

Most read articles by the same author(s)