Issue

Vol. 15 (2023)

Applications of Metal–Organic Frameworks and Their Derivatives in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01092-8
Chengbo Li
School of Materials and Energy, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China
Yuan Ji
School of Materials and Energy, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China
Youpeng Wang
School of Materials and Energy, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China
Chunxiao Liu
School of Materials and Energy, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China
Zhaoyang Chen
School of Materials and Energy, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China
Jialin Tang
School of Materials and Energy, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China
Yawei Hong
School of Materials and Energy, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China
Xu Li
School of Materials and Energy, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China
Tingting Zheng
School of Materials and Energy, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China
Qiu Jiang
School of Materials and Energy, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China
Chuan Xia
School of Materials and Energy, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu 611731, People’s Republic of China

Corresponding Author: Chuan Xia

chuan.xia@uestc.edu.cn

Nano-Micro Letters, Vol. 15 (2023), Article Number: 113

Abstract

Electrochemically reducing CO2 to more reduced chemical species is a promising way that not only enables the conversion of intermittent energy resources to stable fuels, but also helps to build a closed-loop anthropogenic carbon cycle. Among various electrocatalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction, multifunctional metal–organic frameworks (MOFs) have been employed as highly efficient and selective heterogeneous electrocatalysts due to their ultrahigh porosity and topologically diverse structures. Up to now, great progress has been achieved in the design and synthesis of highly active and selective MOF-related catalysts for electrochemical CO2 reduction reaction (CO2RR), and their corresponding reaction mechanisms have been thoroughly studied. In this review, we summarize the recent progress of applying MOFs and their derivatives in CO2RR, with a focus on the design strategies for electrocatalysts and electrolyzers. We first discussed the reaction mechanisms for different CO2RR products and introduced the commonly applied electrolyzer configurations in the current CO2RR system. Then, an overview of several categories of products (CO, HCOOH, CH4, CH3OH, and multi-carbon chemicals) generated from MOFs or their derivatives via CO2RR was discussed. Finally, we offer some insights and perspectives for the future development of MOFs and their derivatives in electrochemical CO2 reduction. We aim to provide new insights into this field and further guide future research for large-scale applications.


Highlights:


1 The electrochemical techniques utilizing metal-organic frameworks (MOFs)-based catalysts for converting CO2 into chemical species are discussed.
2 The structure–activity relationship of MOF-based catalysts in electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions is thoroughly reviewed
3 The challenges and opportunities of large-scale applications of MOF-based materials in electrochemical CO2 reduction reactions are discussed, and possible directions for the future development of MOFs and their derivatives are outlined.

Keywords

Metal–organic frameworks Derivatives Catalyst CO2 reduction reaction Electrocatalysis
Li, Chengbo, Yuan Ji, Youpeng Wang, Chunxiao Liu, Zhaoyang Chen, Jialin Tang, Yawei Hong, Xu Li, Tingting Zheng, Qiu Jiang, and Chuan Xia. 2023. “Applications of Metal–Organic Frameworks and Their Derivatives in Electrochemical CO2 Reduction”. Nano-Micro Letters 15 (April):113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01092-8.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. S. Chu, A. Majumdar, Opportunities and challenges for a sustainable energy future. Nature 488(7411), 294–303 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11475
  2. B. Obama, The irreversible momentum of clean energy. Science 355(6321), 126–129 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam6284
  3. S. Chu, Y. Cui, N. Liu, The path towards sustainable energy. Nat. Mater. 16(1), 16–22 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4834
  4. I. Mexis, G. Todeschini, Battery energy storage systems in the United Kingdom: a review of current state-of-the-art and future applications. Energies 13(14), 3616 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13143616
  5. P.D. Luna, C. Hahn, D. Higgins, S.A. Jaffer, T.F. Jaramillo et al., What would it take for renewably powered electrosynthesis to displace petrochemical processes? Science 364(6438), 350 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aav3506
  6. J.B. Greenblatt, D.J. Miller, J.W. Ager, F.A. Houle, I.D. Sharp, The technical and energetic challenges of separating (photo)electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction products. Joule 2(3), 381–420 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.01.014
  7. O.S. Bushuyev, P.D. Luna, C.T. Dinh, L. Tao, G. Saur et al., What should we make with CO2 and how can we make it? Joule 2(5), 825–832 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.09.003
  8. T. Zheng, C. Liu, C. Guo, M. Zhang, X. Li et al., Copper-catalysed exclusive CO2 to pure formic acid conversion via single-atom alloying. Nat. Nanotechnol. 16(12), 1386–1393 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-021-00974-5
  9. C. Xia, P. Zhu, Q. Jiang, Y. Pan, W. Liang et al., Continuous production of pure liquid fuel solutions via electrocatalytic CO2 reduction using solid-electrolyte devices. Nat. Energy 4(9), 776–785 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0451-x
  10. X. Wang, Z. Wang, F.P. García de Arquer, C.-T. Dinh, A. Ozden et al., Efficient electrically powered CO2-to-ethanol via suppression of deoxygenation. Nat. Energy 5(6), 478–486 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-020-0607-8
  11. Y.Y. Birdja, E. Pérez-Gallent, M.C. Figueiredo, A.J. Göttle, F. Calle-Vallejo et al., Advances and challenges in understanding the electrocatalytic conversion of carbon dioxide to fuels. Nat. Energy 4(9), 732–745 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0450-y
  12. J. Li, H. Zeng, X. Dong, Y. Ding, S. Hu et al., Selective CO2 electrolysis to co using isolated antimony alloyed copper. Nat. Commun. 14(1), 340 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-35960-z
  13. L. Fan, C. Xia, F.Q. Yang, J. Wang, H.T. Wang et al., Strategies in catalysts and electrolyzer design for electrochemical CO2 reduction toward C2+ products. Sci. Adv. 6(8), 17 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aay3111
  14. Y. Li, G. Shi, T. Chen, L. Zhu, D. Yu et al., Simultaneous increase of conductivity, active sites and structural strain by nitrogen injection for high-yield CO2 electro-hydrogenation to liquid fuel. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 305, 121080 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121080
  15. R. Yu, C. Qiu, Z. Lin, H. Liu, J. Gao et al., CeOx promoted electrocatalytic CO2 reduction to formate by assisting in the critical hydrogenation step. ACS Mater. Lett. 4(9), 1749–1755 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.2c00512
  16. J. Li, S.U. Abbas, H. Wang, Z. Zhang, W. Hu, Recent advances in interface engineering for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction reaction. Nano-Micro Lett. 13(1), 216 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00738-9
  17. D. Xue, H. Xia, W. Yan, J. Zhang, S. Mu, Defect engineering on carbon-based catalysts for electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Nano-Micro Lett. 13(1), 5 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-020-00538-7
  18. J. Qiao, Y. Liu, F. Hong, J. Zhang, A review of catalysts for the electroreduction of carbon dioxide to produce low-carbon fuels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43(2), 631–675 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60323g
  19. C. Liu, M. Zhang, J. Li, W. Xue, T. Zheng et al., Nanoconfinement engineering over hollow multi-shell structured copper towards efficient electrocatalytical C-C coupling. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61(3), e202113498 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202113498
  20. T. Tang, Z. Wang, J. Guan, Optimizing the electrocatalytic selectivity of carbon dioxide reduction reaction by regulating the electronic structure of single-atom m-n-c materials. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32(19), 2111504 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202111504
  21. J. Zhu, Y. Wang, A. Zhi, Z. Chen, L. Shi et al., Cation-deficiency-dependent CO2 electroreduction over copper-based ruddlesden-popper perovskite oxides. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61(3), e202111670 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202111670
  22. T. Ahmad, S. Liu, M. Sajid, K. Li, M. Ali et al., Electrochemical CO2 reduction to C2+ products using Cu-based electrocatalysts: a review. Nano Res. Energy 1, 9120021 (2022). https://doi.org/10.26599/nre.2022.9120021
  23. J. Chen, L. Wang, Effects of the catalyst dynamic changes and influence of the reaction environment on the performance of electrochemical CO2 reduction. Adv. Mater. 34(25), e2103900 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202103900
  24. B. Zhang, B. Zhang, Y. Jiang, T. Ma, H. Pan et al., Single-atom electrocatalysts for multi-electron reduction of CO2. Small 17(36), e2101443 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202101443
  25. S. Abednatanzi, P.G. Derakhshandeh, H. Depauw, F.X. Coudert, H. Vrielinck et al., Mixed-metal metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48(9), 2535–2565 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00337h
  26. G. Huang, L. Yang, Q. Yin, Z.B. Fang, X.J. Hu et al., A comparison of two isoreticular metal-organic frameworks with cationic and neutral skeletons: stability, mechanism, and catalytic activity. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59(11), 4385–4390 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201916649
  27. H. Furukawa, K.E. Cordova, M. O’Keeffe, O.M. Yaghi, The chemistry and applications of metal-organic frameworks. Science 341(6149), 1230444 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230444
  28. U. Khan, A. Nairan, J. Gao, Q. Zhang, Current progress in 2D metal-organic frameworks for electrocatalysis. Small Struct (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/sstr.202200109
  29. Y. Wu, Y. Li, J. Gao, Q. Zhang, Recent advances in vacancy engineering of metal-organic frameworks and their derivatives for electrocatalysis. SusMat. 1(1), 66–87 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/sus2.3
  30. R. Dong, P. Han, H. Arora, M. Ballabio, M. Karakusn et al., High-mobility band-like charge transport in a semiconducting two-dimensional metal-organic framework. Nat. Mater. 17(11), 1027–1032 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41563-018-0189-z
  31. J. Gao, X. Qian, R.B. Lin, R. Krishna, H. Wu et al., Mixed metal-organic framework with multiple binding sites for efficient C2H2/CO2 separation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59(11), 4396–4400 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202000323
  32. Y. Cui, J. Zhang, H. He, G. Qian, Photonic functional metal-organic frameworks. Chem. Soc. Rev. 47(15), 5740–5785 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cs00879a
  33. H.B. Wu, X.W. Lou, Metal-organic frameworks and their derived materials for electrochemical energy storage and conversion: promises and challenges. Sci. Adv. 3(12), 16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aap9252
  34. J. Liang, Z. Liang, R. Zou, Y. Zhao, Heterogeneous catalysis in zeolites, mesoporous silica, and metal-organic frameworks. Adv. Mater. 29(30), 1701139 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201701139
  35. M. Du, Q. Li, Y. Zhao, C.-S. Liu, H. Pang, A review of electrochemical energy storage behaviors based on pristine metal-organic frameworks and their composites. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 416, 213341 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213341
  36. S.S.A. Shah, T. Najam, M.K. Aslam, M. Ashfaq, M.M. Rahman et al., Recent advances on oxygen reduction electrocatalysis: correlating the characteristic properties of metal organic frameworks and the derived nanomaterials. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 268(5), 118570 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.118570
  37. H. Zhang, J. Nai, L. Yu, X.W. Lou, Metal-organic-framework-based materials as platforms for renewable energy and environmental applications. Joule 1(1), 77–107 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2017.08.008
  38. F.-Y. Yi, R. Zhang, H. Wang, L.-F. Chen, L. Han et al., Metal-organic frameworks and their composites: synthesis and electrochemical applications. Small Methods 1, 1700187 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201700187
  39. B.Y. Guan, X.Y. Yu, H.B. Wu, X.W.D. Lou, Complex nanostructures from materials based on metal-organic frameworks for electrochemical energy storage and conversion. Adv. Mater. 29(47), 1703614 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703614
  40. J.W. Maina, C. Pozo-Gonzalo, J.A. Schütz, J. Wang, L.F. Dumée, Tuning CO2 conversion product selectivity of metal organic frameworks derived hybrid carbon photoelectrocatalytic reactors. Carbon 148, 80–90 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2019.03.043
  41. J.-K. Sun, Q. Xu, Functional materials derived from open framework templates/precursors: synthesis and applications. Energy Environ. Sci. 7(7), 2071–2100 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4ee00517a
  42. X. Cao, C. Tan, M. Sindoro, H. Zhang, Hybrid micro-/nano-structures derived from metal-organic frameworks: preparation and applications in energy storage and conversion. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46(10), 2660–2677 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cs00426a
  43. J. Liu, D. Zhu, C. Guo, A. Vasileff, S.Z. Qiao, Design strategies toward advanced mof-derived electrocatalysts for energy-conversion reactions. Adv. Energy Mater. 7(23), 1700518 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201700518
  44. X.F. Lu, Y. Fang, D. Luan, X.W.D. Lou, Metal-organic frameworks derived functional materials for electrochemical energy storage and conversion: a mini review. Nano Lett. 21(4), 1555–1565 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.0c04898
  45. R. Yan, T. Ma, M. Cheng, X. Tao, Z. Yang et al., Metal-organic-framework-derived nanostructures as multifaceted electrodes in metal-sulfur batteries. Adv. Mater. 33(27), e2008784 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202008784
  46. S. Sanati, R. Abazari, J. Albero, A. Morsali, H. Garcia et al., Metal-organic framework derived bimetallic materials for electrochemical energy storage. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(20), 11048–11067 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202010093
  47. Z. Liang, T. Qiu, S. Gao, R. Zhong, R. Zou, Multi-scale design of metal–organic framework-derived materials for energy electrocatalysis. Adv. Energy Mater. 12(4), 2003410 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202003410
  48. L. Li, X.D. Li, Y.F. Sun, Y. Xie, Rational design of electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction for a zero-carbon network. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51(4), 1234–1252 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cs00893e
  49. R. Kortlever, J. Shen, K.J. Schouten, F. Calle-Vallejo, M.T. Koper, Catalysts and reaction pathways for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6(20), 4073–4082 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01559
  50. M.T.M. Koper, Thermodynamic theory of multi-electron transfer reactions: implications for electrocatalysis. J. Electroanal. Chem. 660(2), 254–260 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jelechem.2010.10.004
  51. A.D. Handoko, F. Wei, B.S. Jenndy, Z.W. She. Yeo, Understanding heterogeneous electrocatalytic carbon dioxide reduction through operando techniques. Nat. Catal. 1(12), 922–934 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-018-0182-6
  52. S. Nitopi, E. Bertheussen, S.B. Scott, X. Liu, A.K. Engstfeld et al., Progress and perspectives of electrochemical CO2 reduction on copper in aqueous electrolyte. Chem. Rev. 119(12), 7610–7672 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00705
  53. E.E. Benson, C.P. Kubiak, A.J. Sathrum, J.M. Smieja, Electrocatalytic and homogeneous approaches to conversion of CO2 to liquid fuels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 38(1), 89–99 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1039/b804323j
  54. J. Wu, Y. Huang, W. Ye, Y. Li, CO2 reduction: from the electrochemical to photochemical approach. Adv. Sci. 4(11), 1700194 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201700194
  55. J.T. Feaster, C. Shi, E.R. Cave, T. Hatsukade, D.N. Abram et al., Understanding selectivity for the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to formic acid and carbon monoxide on metal electrodes. ACS Catal. 7(7), 4822–4827 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b00687
  56. S. Zhang, P. Kang, T.J. Meyer, Nanostructured tin catalysts for selective electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to formate. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 136(5), 1734–1737 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja4113885
  57. Z. Sun, T. Ma, H. Tao, Q. Fan, B. Han, Fundamentals and challenges of electrochemical CO2 reduction using two-dimensional materials. Chem 3(4), 560–587 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2017.09.009
  58. B. Schmid, C. Reller, S. Neubauer, M. Fleischer, R. Dorta et al., Reactivity of copper electrodes towards functional groups and small molecules in the context of CO2 electro-reductions. Catalysts 7(5), 161 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/catal7050161
  59. A.A. Peterson, F. Abild-Pedersen, F. Studt, J. Rossmeisl, J.K. Norskov, How copper catalyzes the electroreduction of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbon fuels. Energy Environ. Sci. 3(9), 1311–1315 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1039/c0ee00071j
  60. S. Li, H. Duan, J. Yu, C. Qiu, R. Yu et al., Cu vacancy induced product switching from formate to Co for CO2 reduction on copper sulfide. ACS Catal. 12(15), 9074–9082 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.2c01750
  61. A.J. Garza, A.T. Bell, M. Head-Gordon, Mechanism of CO2 reduction at copper surfaces: pathways to C2 products. ACS Catal. 8(2), 1490–1499 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03477
  62. K.J. Schouten, Z. Qin, E.P. Gallent, M.T. Koper, Two pathways for the formation of ethylene in co reduction on single-crystal copper electrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 134(24), 9864–9867 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja302668n
  63. X. Nie, M.R. Esopi, M.J. Janik, A. Asthagiri, Selectivity of CO2 reduction on copper electrodes: the role of the kinetics of elementary steps. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52(9), 2459–2462 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201208320
  64. Y. Hori, R. Takahashi, Y. Yoshinami, A. Murata, Electrochemical reduction of CO at a copper electrode. J. Phys. Chem. B 101(36), 7075–7081 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp970284i
  65. S. Ma, M. Sadakiyo, R. Luo, M. Heima, M. Yamauchi et al., One-step electrosynthesis of ethylene and ethanol from CO2 in an alkaline electrolyzer. J. Power Sources 301, 219–228 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2015.09.124
  66. F. Calle-Vallejo, M.T. Koper, Theoretical considerations on the electroreduction of CO to C2 species on Cu(100) electrodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 52(28), 7282–7285 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201301470
  67. K.J.P. Schouten, Y. Kwon, C.J.M. van der Ham, Z. Qin, M.T.M. Koper, A new mechanism for the selectivity to C1 and C2 species in the electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide on copper electrodes. Chem. Sci. 2(10), 1902–1909 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/c1sc00277e
  68. J.H. Montoya, C. Shi, K. Chan, J.K. Norskov, Theoretical insights into a co dimerization mechanism in CO2 electroreduction. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6(11), 2032–2037 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00722
  69. J.D. Goodpaster, A.T. Bell, M. Head-Gordon, Identification of possible pathways for c-c bond formation during electrochemical reduction of CO2: new theoretical insights from an improved electrochemical model. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7(8), 1471–1477 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.6b00358
  70. T. Burdyny, W.A. Smith, CO2 reduction on gas-diffusion electrodes and why catalytic performance must be assessed at commercially-relevant conditions. Energy Environ. Sci. 12(5), 1442–1453 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ee03134g
  71. M.R. Singh, E.L. Clark, A.T. Bell, Effects of electrolyte, catalyst, and membrane composition and operating conditions on the performance of solar-driven electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 17(29), 18924–18936 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cp03283k
  72. Y. Wang, P. Han, X. Lv, L. Zhang, G. Zheng, Defect and interface engineering for aqueous electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. Joule 2(12), 2551–2582 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2018.09.021
  73. Y. Yang, F. Li, Reactor design for electrochemical CO2 conversion toward large-scale applications. Curr. Opin. Green Sust. 27, 100419 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cogsc.2020.100419
  74. L.C. Weng, A.T. Bell, A.Z. Weber, Modeling gas-diffusion electrodes for CO2 reduction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 20(25), 16973–16984 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cp01319e
  75. C. Chen, J.F.K. Kotyk, S.W. Sheehan, Progress toward commercial application of electrochemical carbon dioxide reduction. Chem 4(11), 2571–2586 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2018.08.019
  76. D. Wakerley, S. Lamaison, J. Wicks, A. Clemens, J. Feaster et al., Gas diffusion electrodes, reactor designs and key metrics of low-temperature CO2 electrolysers. Nat. Energy 7(2), 130–143 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-021-00973-9
  77. Z. Xing, L. Hu, D.S. Ripatti, X. Hu, X. Feng, Enhancing carbon dioxide gas-diffusion electrolysis by creating a hydrophobic catalyst microenvironment. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 136 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-20397-5
  78. F.P.G. de Arquer, C.T. Dinh, A. Ozden, J. Wicks, C. McCallum et al., CO2 electrolysis to multicarbon products at activities greater than 1 A cm-2. Science 367(6478), 661–666 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aay4217
  79. R. Chen, H.Y. Su, D. Liu, R. Huang, X. Meng et al., Highly selective production of ethylene by the electroreduction of carbon monoxide. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59(1), 154–160 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201910662
  80. S. Verma, Y. Hamasaki, C. Kim, W. Huang, S. Lu et al., Insights into the low overpotential electroreduction of CO2 to co on a supported gold catalyst in an alkaline flow electrolyzer. ACS Energy Lett. 3(1), 193–198 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b01096
  81. T.-T. Zhuang, Z.-Q. Liang, A. Seifitokaldani, Y. Li, P.D. Luna et al., Steering post-c–c coupling selectivity enables high efficiency electroreduction of carbon dioxide to multi-carbon alcohols. Nat. Catal. 1(6), 421–428 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-018-0084-7
  82. S.S. Bhargava, F. Proietto, D. Azmoodeh, E.R. Cofell, D.A. Henckel et al., System design rules for intensifying the electrochemical reduction of CO2 to Co on Ag nanops. ChemElectroChem 7(9), 2001–2011 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202000089
  83. F.-Y. Gao, R.-C. Bao, M.-R. Gao, S.-H. Yu, Electrochemical CO2-to-CO conversion: electrocatalysts, electrolytes, and electrolyzers. J. Mater. Chem. A 8(31), 15458–15478 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta03525d
  84. N.T. Nesbitt, T. Burdyny, H. Simonson, D. Salvatore, D. Bohra et al., Liquid–solid boundaries dominate activity of CO2 reduction on gas-diffusion electrodes. ACS Catal. 10(23), 14093–14106 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c03319
  85. Z. Yin, H. Peng, X. Wei, H. Zhou, J. Gong et al., An alkaline polymer electrolyte CO2 electrolyzer operated with pure water. Energy Environ. Sci. 12(8), 2455–2462 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ee01204d
  86. B. Endrődi, E. Kecsenovity, A. Samu, T. Halmágyi, S. Rojas-Carbonell et al., High carbonate ion conductance of a robust piperion membrane allows industrial current density and conversion in a zero-gap carbon dioxide electrolyzer cell. Energy Environ. Sci. 13(11), 4098–4105 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee02589e
  87. C.M. Gabardo, C.P. O’Brien, J.P. Edwards, C. McCallum, Y. Xu et al., Continuous carbon dioxide electroreduction to concentrated multi-carbon products using a membrane electrode assembly. Joule 3(11), 2777–2791 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2019.07.021
  88. L. Ge, H. Rabiee, M. Li, S. Subramanian, Y. Zheng et al., Electrochemical CO2 reduction in membrane-electrode assemblies. Chem 8(3), 663–692 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chempr.2021.12.002
  89. A. Gawel, T. Jaster, D. Siegmund, J. Holzmann, H. Lohmann et al., Electrochemical CO2 reduction—the macroscopic world of electrode design, reactor concepts & economic aspects. iScience 25(4), 104011 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2022.104011
  90. L.-C. Weng, A.T. Bell, A.Z. Weber, Towards membrane-electrode assembly systems for CO2 reduction: A modeling study. Energy Environ. Sci. 12(6), 1950–1968 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ee00909d
  91. R. Hinogami, S. Yotsuhashi, M. Deguchi, Y. Zenitani, H. Hashiba et al., Electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide using a copper rubeanate metal organic framework. ECS Electrochem. Lett. 1(4), H17–H19 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1149/2.001204eel
  92. R.S. Kumar, S.S. Kumar, M.A. Kulandainathan, Highly selective electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide using Cu based metal organic framework as an electrocatalyst. Electrochem. Commun. 25, 70–73 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.elecom.2012.09.018
  93. M.C.O. Monteiro, M.F. Philips, K.J.P. Schouten, M.T.M. Koper, Efficiency and selectivity of CO2 reduction to co on gold gas diffusion electrodes in acidic media. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 4943 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24936-6
  94. S. Verma, B. Kim, H.R. Jhong, S. Ma, P.J. Kenis, A gross-margin model for defining technoeconomic benchmarks in the electroreduction of CO2. ChemSusChem 9(15), 1972–1979 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201600394
  95. M. Jouny, W. Luc, F. Jiao, General techno-economic analysis of CO2 electrolysis systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 57(6), 2165–2177 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03514
  96. N. Kornienko, Y. Zhao, C.S. Kley, C. Zhu, D. Kim et al., Metal-organic frameworks for electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137(44), 14129–14135 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b08212
  97. B.-X. Dong, S.-L. Qian, F.-Y. Bu, Y.-C. Wu, L.-G. Feng et al., Electrochemical reduction of CO2 to co by a heterogeneous catalyst of fe–porphyrin-based metal–organic framework. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 1(9), 4662–4669 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsaem.8b00797
  98. M.-D. Zhang, D.-H. Si, J.-D. Yi, Q. Yin, Y.-B. Huang et al., Conductive phthalocyanine-based metal-organic framework as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for carbon dioxide reduction reaction. Sci. China Chem. 64(8), 1332–1339 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11426-021-1022-3
  99. J.D. Yi, D.H. Si, R. Xie, Q. Yin, M.D. Zhang et al., Conductive two-dimensional phthalocyanine-based metal-organic framework nanosheets for efficient electroreduction of CO2. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(31), 17108–17114 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202104564
  100. L. Majidi, A. Ahmadiparidari, N. Shan, S.N. Misal, K. Kumar et al., 2D copper tetrahydroxyquinone conductive metal-organic framework for selective CO2 electrocatalysis at low overpotentials. Adv. Mater. 33(10), e2004393 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202004393
  101. H. Zhong, M. Ghorbani-Asl, K.H. Ly, J. Zhang, J. Ge et al., Synergistic electroreduction of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide on bimetallic layered conjugated metal-organic frameworks. Nat. Commun. 11(1), 1409 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15141-y
  102. S. Dou, J. Song, S. Xi, Y. Du, J. Wang et al., Boosting electrochemical CO2 reduction on metal-organic frameworks via ligand doping. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58(12), 4041–4045 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201814711
  103. Q. Huang, Q. Li, J. Liu, Y.R. Wang, R. Wang et al., Disclosing CO2 activation mechanism by hydroxyl-induced crystalline structure transformation in electrocatalytic process. Matter 1(6), 1656–1668 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2019.07.003
  104. T.A. Al-Attas, N.N. Marei, X. Yong, N.G. Yasri, V. Thangadurai et al., Ligand-engineered metal-organic frameworks for electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide to carbon monoxide. ACS Catal. 11(12), 7350–7357 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c01506
  105. Z. Xin, Y.-R. Wang, Y. Chen, W.-L. Li, L.-Z. Dong et al., Metallocene implanted metalloporphyrin organic framework for highly selective CO2 electroreduction. Nano Energy 67, 104233 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104233
  106. Z. Xin, J. Liu, X. Wang, K. Shen, Z. Yuan et al., Implanting polypyrrole in metal-porphyrin MOFs: enhanced electrocatalytic performance for CO2RR. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13(46), 54959–54966 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c15187
  107. Y.N. Gong, L. Jiao, Y.Y. Qian, C.Y. Pan, L.R. Zheng et al., Regulating the coordination environment of mof-templated single-atom nickel electrocatalysts for boosting CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59(7), 2705–2709 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201914977
  108. Z. Chen, X. Zhang, W. Liu, M. Jiao, K. Mou et al., Amination strategy to boost the CO2 electroreduction current density of M-N/C single-atom catalysts to the industrial application level. Energy Environ. Sci. 14(4), 2349–2356 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee04052e
  109. L. Lin, H. Li, C. Yan, H. Li, R. Si et al., Synergistic catalysis over iron-nitrogen sites anchored with cobalt phthalocyanine for efficient CO2 electroreduction. Adv. Mater. 31(41), e1903470 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201903470
  110. J. Han, P. An, S. Liu, X. Zhang, D. Wang et al., Reordering d orbital energies of single-site catalysts for CO2 electroreduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58(36), 12711–12716 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201907399
  111. L. Ye, X. Chen, Y. Gao, X. Ding, J. Hou et al., Ultrathin two-dimensional metal–organic framework nanosheets for efficient electrochemical CO2 reduction. J. Energy Chem. 57, 627–631 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.09.021
  112. T. Yan, P. Wang, Z.H. Xu, W.Y. Sun, Copper(ii) frameworks with varied active site distribution for modulating selectivity of carbon dioxide electroreduction. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 14(11), 13645–13652 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.2c00487
  113. Y. Guo, W. Shi, H. Yang, Q. He, Z. Zeng et al., Cooperative stabilization of the [pyridinium-CO2-CO] adduct on a metal-organic layer enhances electrocatalytic CO2 reduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141(44), 17875–17883 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b09227
  114. Y. Lu, H. Zhong, J. Li, A.M. Dominic, Y. Hu et al., Sp-carbon incorporated conductive metal-organic framework as photocathode for photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61(39), e202208163 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202208163
  115. H. Zhong, K.H. Ly, M. Wang, Y. Krupskaya, X. Han et al., A phthalocyanine-based layered two-dimensional conjugated metal-organic framework as a highly efficient electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58(31), 10677–10682 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201907002
  116. M. Wang, R. Dong, X. Feng, Two-dimensional conjugated metal-organic frameworks (2d C-MOFs): Chemistry and function for moftronics. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50(4), 2764–2793 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs01160f
  117. Z. Guo, G. Chen, C. Cometto, B. Ma, H. Zhao et al., Selectivity control of co versus HCOO− production in the visible-light-driven catalytic reduction of CO2 with two cooperative metal sites. Nat. Catal. 2(9), 801–808 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-019-0331-6
  118. D. Mellmann, P. Sponholz, H. Junge, M. Beller, Formic acid as a hydrogen storage material-development of homogeneous catalysts for selective hydrogen release. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45(14), 3954–3988 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00618j
  119. L. Calzadiaz-Ramirez, A.S. Meyer, Formate dehydrogenases for CO2 utilization. Curr. Opin. Biotech. 73, 95–100 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2021.07.011
  120. Y. Zhou, S. Liu, Y. Gu, G.H. Wen, J. Ma et al., In(iii) metal-organic framework incorporated with enzyme-mimicking nickel bis(dithiolene) ligand for highly selective CO2 electroreduction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143(35), 14071–14076 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c06797
  121. Z.H. Zhu, B.H. Zhao, S.L. Hou, X.L. Jiang, Z.L. Liang et al., A facile strategy for constructing a carbon-p-modified metal-organic framework for enhancing the efficiency of CO2 electroreduction into formate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(43), 23394–23402 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202110387
  122. C. Qiu, K. Qian, J. Yu, M. Sun, S. Cao et al., Mof-transformed In2O3-x@C nanocorn electrocatalyst for efficient CO2 reduction to HCOOH. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 167 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00913-6
  123. W. Geng, W. Chen, G. Li, X. Dong, Y. Song et al., Induced CO2 electroreduction to formic acid on metal-organic frameworks via node doping. ChemSusChem 13(16), 4035–4040 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202001310
  124. Y. Deng, S. Wang, Y. Huang, X. Li, Structural reconstruction of Sn-based metal-organic frameworks for efficient electrochemical CO2 reduction to formate. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 43, 353–359 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2022.03.006
  125. J.X. Wu, X.R. Zhu, T. Liang, X.D. Zhang, S.Z. Hou et al., Sn(101) derived from metal-organic frameworks for efficient electrocatalytic reduction of CO2. Inorg. Chem. 60(13), 9653–9659 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.1c00946
  126. X. Zhang, Y. Zhang, Q. Li, X. Zhou, Q. Li et al., Highly efficient and durable aqueous electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to HCOOH with a novel bismuth-MOF: experimental and dft studies. J. Mater. Chem. A 8(19), 9776–9787 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta00384k
  127. F. Li, G.H. Gu, C. Choi, P. Kolla, S. Hong et al., Highly stable two-dimensional bismuth metal-organic frameworks for efficient electrochemical reduction of CO2. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 277, 119241 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119241
  128. J. Yang, X. Wang, Y. Qu, X. Wang, H. Huo et al., Bi-based metal-organic framework derived leafy bismuth nanosheets for carbon dioxide electroreduction. Adv. Energy Mater. 10(36), 2001709 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202001709
  129. P. Deng, F. Yang, Z. Wang, S. Chen, Y. Zhou et al., Metal-organic framework-derived carbon nanorods encapsulating bismuth oxides for rapid and selective CO2 electroreduction to formate. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59(27), 10807–10813 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202000657
  130. Y. Ying, B. Khezri, J. Kosina, M. Pumera, Reconstructed bismuth-based metal-organic framework nanofibers for selective CO2-to-formate conversion: Morphology engineering. ChemSusChem 14(16), 3402–3412 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202101122
  131. Q. Wang, X. Yang, H. Zang, F. Chen, C. Wang et al., Metal-organic framework-derived biin bimetallic oxide nanops embedded in carbon networks for efficient electrochemical reduction of CO2 to formate. Inorg. Chem. 61(30), 12003–12011 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.2c01961
  132. C. Cao, D.D. Ma, J.F. Gu, X. Xie, G. Zeng et al., Metal-organic layers leading to atomically thin bismuthene for efficient carbon dioxide electroreduction to liquid fuel. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59(35), 15014–15020 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202005577
  133. W.-W. Yuan, J.-X. Wu, X.-D. Zhang, S.-Z. Hou, M. Xu et al., In situ transformation of bismuth metal-organic frameworks for efficient selective electroreduction of CO2 to formate. J. Mater. Chem. A 8(46), 24486–24492 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta08092f
  134. D. Yao, C. Tang, A. Vasileff, X. Zhi, Y. Jiao et al., The controllable reconstruction of Bi-MOFs for electrochemical CO2 reduction through electrolyte and potential mediation. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(33), 18178–18184 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202104747
  135. Q. Zhu, D. Yang, H. Liu, X. Sun, C. Chen et al., Hollow metal-organic-framework-mediated in situ architecture of copper dendrites for enhanced CO2 electroreduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59(23), 8896–8901 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202001216
  136. K. Yao, H. Wang, X. Yang, Y. Huang, C. Kou et al., Metal-organic framework derived dual-metal sites for electroreduction of carbon dioxide to HCOOH. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 311, 121377 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.1213
  137. P. Lamagni, M. Miola, J. Catalano, M.S. Hvid, M.A.H. Mamakhel et al., Restructuring metal-organic frameworks to nanoscale bismuth electrocatalysts for highly active and selective CO2 reduction to formate. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(16), 1910408 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201910408
  138. Y.X. Duan, K.H. Liu, Q. Zhang, J.M. Yan, Q. Jiang, Efficient CO2 reduction to HCOOH with high selectivity and energy efficiency over Bi/rGO catalyst. Small Methods 4(5), 1900846 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201900846
  139. H.Q. Fu, J. Liu, N.M. Bedford, Y. Wang, J. Wright et al., Operando converting BiOCl into Bi2O2(CO3)xCly for efficient electrocatalytic reduction of carbon dioxide to formate. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 121 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00862-0
  140. D. Wu, R. Feng, C. Xu, P.-F. Sui, J. Zhang et al., Regulating the electron localization of metallic bismuth for boosting CO2 electroreduction. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 38 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00772-7
  141. M. Qi, J. Park, R.S. Landon, J. Kim, Y. Liu et al., Continuous and flexible renewable-power-to-methane via liquid CO2 energy storage: revisiting the techno-economic potential. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 153, 111732 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.111732
  142. X. Liu, H. Yang, J. He, H. Liu, L. Song et al., Highly active, durable ultrathin MoTe2 layers for the electroreduction of CO2 to CH4. Small 14(16), e1704049 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201704049
  143. X. Li, Y. Sun, J. Xu, Y. Shao, J. Wu et al., Selective visible-light-driven photocatalytic CO2 reduction to CH4 mediated by atomically thin CuIn5S8 layers. Nat. Energy 4(8), 690–699 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41560-019-0431-1
  144. M.K. Kim, H.J. Kim, H. Lim, Y. Kwon, H.M. Jeong, Metal-organic framework-mediated strategy for enhanced methane production on copper nanops in electrochemical CO2 reduction. Electrochim. Acta 306, 28–34 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2019.03.101
  145. F. Yang, A. Chen, P.L. Deng, Y. Zhou, Z. Shahid et al., Highly efficient electroconversion of carbon dioxide into hydrocarbons by cathodized copper-organic frameworks. Chem. Sci. 10(34), 7975–7981 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9sc02605c
  146. X. Tan, C. Yu, C. Zhao, H. Huang, X. Yao et al., Restructuring of Cu2O to Cu2O@Cu-metal-organic frameworks for selective electrochemical reduction of CO2. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 11(10), 9904–9910 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.8b19111
  147. J.D. Yi, R. Xie, Z.L. Xie, G.L. Chai, T.F. Liu et al., Highly selective CO2 electroreduction to CH4 by in situ generated Cu2O single-type sites on a conductive MOF: Stabilizing key intermediates with hydrogen bonding. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 59(52), 23641–23648 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202010601
  148. H.-L. Zhu, J.-R. Huang, X.-W. Zhang, C. Wang, N.-Y. Huang et al., Highly efficient electroconversion of CO2 into CH4 by a metal-organic framework with trigonal pyramidal Cu(1)N3 active sites. ACS Catal. 11(18), 11786–11792 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c02980
  149. L. Zhang, X.X. Li, Z.L. Lang, Y. Liu, J. Liu et al., Enhanced cuprophilic interactions in crystalline catalysts facilitate the highly selective electroreduction of CO2 to CH4. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143(10), 3808–3816 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c11450
  150. Y. Zhang, L.Z. Dong, S. Li, X. Huang, J.N. Chang et al., Coordination environment dependent selectivity of single-site-Cu enriched crystalline porous catalysts in CO2 reduction to CH4. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 6390 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26724-8
  151. Y. Liu, S. Li, L. Dai, J. Li, J. Lv et al., The synthesis of hexaazatrinaphthylene-based 2d conjugated copper metal-organic framework for highly selective and stable electroreduction of CO2 to methane. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(30), 16409–16415 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202105966
  152. Y. Zhang, Q. Zhou, Z.F. Qiu, X.Y. Zhang, J.Q. Chen et al., Tailoring coordination microenvironment of Cu(1) in metal-organic frameworks for enhancing electroreduction of CO2 to CH4. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32(36), 2203677 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202203677
  153. Y. Fang, J.C. Flake, Electrochemical reduction of CO2 at functionalized Au electrodes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(9), 3399–3405 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b11023
  154. M.S. Xie, B.Y. Xia, Y. Li, Y. Yan, Y. Yang et al., Amino acid modified copper electrodes for the enhanced selective electroreduction of carbon dioxide towards hydrocarbons. Energy Environ. Sci. 9(5), 1687–1695 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5ee03694a
  155. S. Ahn, K. Klyukin, R.J. Wakeham, J.A. Rudd, A.R. Lewis et al., Poly-amide modified copper foam electrodes for enhanced electrochemical reduction of carbon dioxide. ACS Catal. 8(5), 4132–4142 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b04347
  156. Y. Qiu, H. Zhong, W. Xu, T. Zhang, X. Li et al., Tuning the electrocatalytic properties of a Cu electrode with organic additives containing amine group for CO2 reduction. J. Mater. Chem. A 7(10), 5453–5462 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta00039a
  157. N.J. Firet, W.A. Smith, Probing the reaction mechanism of CO2 electroreduction over ag films via operando infrared spectroscopy. ACS Catal. 7(1), 606–612 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b02382
  158. E. Perez-Gallent, M.C. Figueiredo, F. Calle-Vallejo, M.T. Koper, Spectroscopic observation of a hydrogenated co dimer intermediate during co reduction on Cu(100) electrodes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 56(13), 3621–3624 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201700580
  159. S. Zhu, T. Li, W.-B. Cai, M. Shao, CO2 electrochemical reduction as probed through infrared spectroscopy. ACS Energy Lett. 4(3), 682–689 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.8b02525
  160. Y. Pei, H. Zhong, F. Jin, A brief review of electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 materials, reaction conditions, and devices. Energy Sci. Eng. 9(7), 1012–1032 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.935
  161. S. Zivkovic, M. Veljkovic, Environmental impacts the of production and use of biodiesel. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 25(1), 191–199 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0649-z
  162. L. Bilgili, Comparative assessment of alternative marine fuels in life cycle perspective. Renew. Sust. Energy Rev. 144, 110985 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110985
  163. I.U. Din, M.S. Shaharun, M.A. Alotaibi, A.I. Alharthi, A. Naeem, Recent developments on heterogeneous catalytic CO2 reduction to methanol. J. CO2 Util. 34, 20–33 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcou.2019.05.036
  164. K. Zhao, Y. Liu, X. Quan, S. Chen, H. Yu, CO2 electroreduction at low overpotential on oxide-derived Cu/carbons fabricated from metal organic framework. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(6), 5302–5311 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.6b15402
  165. X. Yang, J. Cheng, X. Yang, Y. Xu, W. Sun et al., MOF-derived Cu@Cu2O heterogeneous electrocatalyst with moderate intermediates adsorption for highly selective reduction of CO2 to methanol. Chem. Eng. J. 431, 2203677 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.2203677
  166. S. Payra, S. Shenoy, C. Chakraborty, K. Tarafder, S. Roy, Structure-sensitive electrocatalytic reduction of CO2 to methanol over carbon-supported intermetallic PtZn nano-alloys. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 12(17), 19402–19414 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.0c00521
  167. H. Yang, Y. Wu, G. Li, Q. Lin, Q. Hu et al., Scalable production of efficient single-atom copper decorated carbon membranes for CO2 electroreduction to methanol. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141(32), 12717–12723 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b04907
  168. J. Liu, D. Yang, Y. Zhou, G. Zhang, G. Xing et al., Tricycloquinazoline-based 2D conductive metal-organic frameworks as promising electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(26), 14473–14479 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202103398
  169. L. Zaza, K. Rossi, R. Buonsanti, Well-defined copper-based nanocatalysts for selective electrochemical reduction of CO2 to C2 products. ACS Energy Lett. 7(4), 1284–1291 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.2c00035
  170. Y. Zheng, A. Vasileff, X. Zhou, Y. Jiao, M. Jaroniec et al., Understanding the roadmap for electrochemical reduction of CO2 to multi-carbon oxygenates and hydrocarbons on copper-based catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 141(19), 7646–7659 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.9b02124
  171. W. Pei, S. Zhou, J. Zhao, X. Xu, Y. Du et al., Immobilized trimeric metal clusters: a family of the smallest catalysts for selective CO2 reduction toward multi-carbon products. Nano Energy 76, 105049 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105049
  172. A.R. Woldu, Z. Huang, P. Zhao, L. Hu, D. Astruc, Electrochemical CO2 reduction (CO2RR) to multi-carbon products over copper-based catalysts. Coordin. Chem. Rev. 454, 214340 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214340
  173. Y. Zhang, K. Li, M. Chen, J. Wang, J. Liu et al., Cu/Cu2O nanops supported on vertically ZIF-l-coated nitrogen-doped graphene nanosheets for electroreduction of CO2 to ethanol. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 3(1), 257–263 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsanm.9b01935
  174. Z.H. Zhao, K. Zheng, N.Y. Huang, H.L. Zhu, J.R. Huang et al., A Cu(111)@metal-organic framework as a tandem catalyst for highly selective CO2 electroreduction to C2H4. Chem. Commun. 57(95), 12764–12767 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cc05376k
  175. Y. Han, S. Zhu, S. Xu, X. Niu, Z. Xu et al., Understanding structure-activity relationship on metal-organic-framework-derived catalyst for CO2 electroreduction to C2 products. ChemElectroChem 8(16), 3174–3180 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.202100942
  176. H. Huo, J. Wang, Q. Fan, Y. Hu, J. Yang, Cu-MOFs derived porous Cu nanoribbons with strengthened electric field for selective CO2 electroreduction to C2+ fuels. Adv. Energy Mater. 11(42), 2102447 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202102447
  177. X.F. Qiu, H.L. Zhu, J.R. Huang, P.Q. Liao, X.M. Chen, Highly selective CO2 electroreduction to C2H4 using a metal-organic framework with dual active sites. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143(19), 7242–7246 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c01466
  178. C.F. Wen, M. Zhou, P.F. Liu, Y. Liu, X. Wu et al., Highly ethylene-selective electrocatalytic CO2 reduction enabled by isolated Cu-S motifs in metal-organic framework based precatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61(2), e202111700 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202111700
  179. X. Xie, X. Zhang, M. Xie, L. Xiong, H. Sun et al., Au-activated N motifs in non-coherent cupric porphyrin metal organic frameworks for promoting and stabilizing ethylene production. Nat. Commun. 13(1), 63 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27768-6
  180. D. Karapinar, N.T. Huan, N.R. Sahraie, J.K. Li, D. Wakerley et al., Electroreduction of CO2 on single-site copper-nitrogen-doped carbon material: Selective formation of ethanol and reversible restructuration of the metal sites. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58(42), 15098–15103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201907994
  181. K. Zhao, X. Nie, H. Wang, S. Chen, X. Quan et al., Selective electroreduction of CO2 to acetone by single copper atoms anchored on N-doped porous carbon. Nat. Commun. 11(1), 2455 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16381-8
  182. Y. Yang, L. Ohnoutek, S. Ajmal, X. Zheng, Y. Feng et al., “Hot edges” in an inverse opal structure enable efficient CO2 electrochemical reduction and sensitive in situ raman characterization. J. Mater. Chem. A 7(19), 11836–11846 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta02288k
  183. G. Iijima, T. Inomata, H. Yamaguchi, M. Ito, H. Masuda, Role of a hydroxide layer on Cu electrodes in electrochemical CO2 reduction. ACS Catal. 9(7), 6305–6319 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b00896
  184. Y. Liu, H. Jiang, Z. Hou, Hidden mechanism behind the roughness-enhanced selectivity of carbon monoxide electrocatalytic reduction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60(20), 11133–11137 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202016332
  185. C.T. Dinh, T. Burdyny, M.G. Kibria, A. Seifitokaldani, C.M. Gabardo et al., CO2 electroreduction to ethylene via hydroxide-mediated copper catalysis at an abrupt interface. Science 360(6390), 783–787 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aas9100
  186. L. Fan, C. Xia, P. Zhu, Y. Lu, H. Wang, Electrochemical CO2 reduction to high-concentration pure formic acid solutions in an all-solid-state reactor. Nat. Commun. 11(1), 3633 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17403-1
  187. T. Zheng, M. Zhang, L. Wu, S. Guo, X. Liu et al., Upcycling CO2 into energy-rich long-chain compounds via electrochemical and metabolic engineering. Nat. Catal. 5(5), 388–396 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-022-00775-6
Read More
Author biographies are not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 3102 Download : 2339

Most read articles by the same author(s)