Issue

Vol. 15 (2023)

Machine Learning-Assisted Low-Dimensional Electrocatalysts Design for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01192-5
Jin Li
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, and Henan Key Laboratory of Function‑Oriented Porous Materials, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471934, People’s Republic of China
Naiteng Wu
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, and Henan Key Laboratory of Function‑Oriented Porous Materials, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471934, People’s Republic of China
Jian Zhang
New Energy Technology Engineering Lab of Jiangsu Province, College of Science, Nanjing University of Posts and Telecommunications (NUPT), Nanjing 210023, People’s Republic of China
Hong‑Hui Wu
School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100083, People’s Republic of China
Kunming Pan
Henan Key Laboratory of High‑Temperature Structural and Functional Materials, National Joint Engineering Research Center for Abrasion Control and Molding of Metal Materials, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471003, People’s Republic of China
Yingxue Wang
National Engineering Laboratory for Risk Perception and Prevention, Beijing 100041, People’s Republic of China
Guilong Liu
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, and Henan Key Laboratory of Function‑Oriented Porous Materials, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471934, People’s Republic of China
Xianming Liu
College of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, and Henan Key Laboratory of Function‑Oriented Porous Materials, Luoyang Normal University, Luoyang 471934, People’s Republic of China
Zhenpeng Yao
Center of Hydrogen Science, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200000, People’s Republic of China
Qiaobao Zhang
State Key Laboratory of Physical Chemistry of Solid Surfaces, College of Materials, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361005, People’s Republic of China

Corresponding Author: Qiaobao Zhang

zhangqiaobao@xmu.edu.cn

Nano-Micro Letters, Vol. 15 (2023), Article Number: 227

Abstract

Efficient electrocatalysts are crucial for hydrogen generation from electrolyzing water. Nevertheless, the conventional "trial and error" method for producing advanced electrocatalysts is not only cost-ineffective but also time-consuming and labor-intensive. Fortunately, the advancement of machine learning brings new opportunities for electrocatalysts discovery and design. By analyzing experimental and theoretical data, machine learning can effectively predict their hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) performance. This review summarizes recent developments in machine learning for low-dimensional electrocatalysts, including zero-dimension nanoparticles and nanoclusters, one-dimensional nanotubes and nanowires, two-dimensional nanosheets, as well as other electrocatalysts. In particular, the effects of descriptors and algorithms on screening low-dimensional electrocatalysts and investigating their HER performance are highlighted. Finally, the future directions and perspectives for machine learning in electrocatalysis are discussed, emphasizing the potential for machine learning to accelerate electrocatalyst discovery, optimize their performance, and provide new insights into electrocatalytic mechanisms. Overall, this work offers an in-depth understanding of the current state of machine learning in electrocatalysis and its potential for future research.


Highlights:
1 The process of machine learning is introduced in detail.
2 Recent developments in machine learning for low-dimensional electrocatalysts are briefly reviewed.
3 Future directions and perspectives for machine learning in hydrogen evolution reaction are critically discussed.

Keywords

Machine learning Hydrogen evolution reaction Low-dimensional electrocatalyst Descriptor Algorithm
Li, Jin, Naiteng Wu, Jian Zhang, Hong‑Hui Wu, Kunming Pan, Yingxue Wang, Guilong Liu, Xianming Liu, Zhenpeng Yao, and Qiaobao Zhang. 2023. “Machine Learning-Assisted Low-Dimensional Electrocatalysts Design for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction”. Nano-Micro Letters 15 (October):227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01192-5.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. J. Xiong, D. Xu, Relationship between energy consumption, economic growth and environmental pollution in China. Environ. Res. 194, 110718 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2021.110718
  2. S. Ligani Fereja, P. Li, Z. Zhang, J. Guo, Z. Fang et al., W-doping induced abundant active sites in a 3D NiS2/MoO2 heterostructure as an efficient electrocatalyst for urea oxidation and hydrogen evolution reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 432, 134274 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.134274
  3. B. Zhao, J. Liu, C. Xu, R. Feng, P. Sui et al., Hollow NiSe nanocrystals heterogenized with carbon nanotubes for efficient electrocatalytic methanol upgrading to boost hydrogen co-production. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31(8), 2008812 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202008812
  4. A. Mistry, A.A. Franco, S.J. Cooper, S.A. Roberts, V. Viswanathan, How machine learning will revolutionize electrochemical sciences. ACS Energy Lett. 6(4), 1422–1431 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.1c00194
  5. Y. Wu, W. Wei, R. Yu, L. Xia, X. Hong et al., Anchoring sub-nanometer Pt clusters on crumpled paper-like mxene enables high hydrogen evolution mass activity. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32(17), 2110910 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202110910
  6. J. Zhang, R. Cui, C. Gao, L. Bian, Y. Pu et al., Cation-modulated HER and OER activities of hierarchical VOOH hollow architectures for high-efficiency and stable overall water splitting. Small 15(47), 1904688 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201904688
  7. G. Qian, J. Chen, T. Yu, J. Liu, L. Luo et al., Three-phase heterojunction NiMo-based nano-needle for water splitting at industrial alkaline condition. Nano-Micro Lett. 14, 1–15 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00744-x
  8. C. Pylianidis, V. Snow, H. Overweg, S. Osinga, J. Kean et al., Simulation-assisted machine learning for operational digital twins. Environ. Modell. Softw. 148, 105274 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2021.105274
  9. J. Li, J. Luo, H. Chen, B. Qin, C. Yuan et al., Strong electronic metal-support interaction between Pt and stainless mesh for enhancing the hydrogen evolution reaction. Chem. Commun. 58(71), 9918–9921 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2cc02988j
  10. J. Li, J. Wang, Y. Liu, C. Yuan, G. Liu et al., Sodium tungsten bronze-supported Pt electrocatalysts for the high-performance hydrogen evolution reaction. Catal. Sci. Technol. 12(14), 4498–4510 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2cy00577h
  11. S. Anantharaj, Ru-tweaking of non-precious materials: the tale of a strategy that ensures both cost and energy efficiency in electrocatalytic water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 9(11), 6710–6731 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta12424a
  12. C. Walter, P.W. Menezes, M. Driess, Perspective on intermetallics towards efficient electrocatalytic water-splitting. Chem. Sci. 12(25), 8603–8631 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1sc01901e
  13. T. Gu, R. Sa, L. Zhang, D.-S. Li, R. Wang, Engineering interfacial coupling between Mo2C nanosheets and Co@NC polyhedron for boosting electrocatalytic water splitting and zinc-air batteries. Appl. Catal. B: Environ. 296, 120360 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120360
  14. J. Zhang, J. Li, H. Huang, W. Chen, Y. Cui et al., Spatial relation controllable di-defects synergy boosts electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution reaction over VSe2 nanoflakes in all pH electrolytes. Small 18(47), 2204557 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202204557
  15. J. Li, J. Zhang, J. Shen, H.-H. Wu, H. Chen et al., Self-supported electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Mater. Chem. Front. 7, 567–606 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2qm00931e
  16. Y. Zhao, S. Wei, K. Pan, Z. Dong, B. Zhang et al., Self-supporting transition metal chalcogenides on metal substrates for catalytic water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 421, 129645 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129645
  17. Y. Zhao, S. Wei, L. Xia, K. Pan, B. Zhang et al., Sintered Ni metal as a matrix of robust self-supporting electrode for ultra-stable hydrogen evolution. Chem. Eng. J. 430, 133040 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.133040
  18. C.-Y. Pei, T. Li, M. Zhang, J.-W. Wang, L. Chang et al., Synergistic effects of interface coupling and defect sites in WO3/InVO4 architectures for highly efficient nitrogen photofixation. Sep. Purif. Technol. 290, 120875 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seppur.2022.120875
  19. J. Chen, M. Qin, S. Ma, R. Fan, X. Zheng et al., Rational construction of Pt/PtTex interface with optimal intermediate adsorption energy for efficient hydrogen evolution reaction. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 299, 120640 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120640
  20. G.L.W. Hart, T. Mueller, C. Toher, S. Curtarolo, Machine learning for alloys. Nat. Rev. Mater. 6(8), 730–755 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-021-00340-w
  21. N. Artrith, K.T. Butler, F.X. Coudert, S. Han, O. Isayev et al., Best practices in machine learning for chemistry. Nat. Chem. 13(6), 505–508 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-021-00716-z
  22. J. Peng, D. Schwalbe-Koda, K. Akkiraju, T. Xie, L. Giordano et al., Human- and machine-centred designs of molecules and materials for sustainability and decarbonization. Nat. Rev. Mater. 7(12), 991–1009 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-022-00466-5
  23. C.H. Chan, M. Sun, B. Huang, Application of machine learning for advanced material prediction and design. EcoMat 4(4), 12194 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/eom2.12194
  24. P. Riley, Three pitfalls to avoid in machine learning. Nature 572(7767), 27–29 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02307-y
  25. Z.H. Zhou, Open-environment machine learning. Nat. Sci. Rev. 9(8), 123 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1093/nsr/nwac123
  26. Z. Yao, Y. Lum, A. Johnston, L.M. Mejia-Mendoza, X. Zhou et al., Machine learning for a sustainable energy future. Nat. Rev. Mater. 8, 202–215 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-022-00490-5
  27. T. Liu, X. Zhao, X. Liu, W. Xiao, Z. Luo et al., Understanding the hydrogen evolution reaction activity of doped single-atom catalysts on two-dimensional GaPS4 by DFT and machine learning. J. Energy Chem. 81, 93–100 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2023.02.018
  28. R.B. Wexler, J.M.P. Martirez, A.M. Rappe, Chemical pressure-driven enhancement of the hydrogen evolving activity of Ni2P from nonmetal surface doping interpreted via machine learning. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140(13), 4678–4683 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b00947
  29. N.K. Pandit, D. Roy, S.C. Mandal, B. Pathak, Rational designing of bimetallic/trimetallic hydrogen evolution reaction catalysts using supervised machine learning. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13(32), 7583–7593 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01401
  30. A.J. Parker, G. Opletal, A.S. Barnard, Classification of platinum nanop catalysts using machine learning. J. Appl. Phys. 128(1), 14301 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0009129
  31. J. Kim, D. Kang, S. Kim, H.W. Jang, Catalyze materials science with machine learning. ACS Mater. Lett. 3(8), 1151–1171 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsmaterialslett.1c00204
  32. R. Ding, Y. Ding, H. Zhang, R. Wang, Z. Xu et al., Applying machine learning to boost the development of high-performance membrane electrode assembly for proton exchange membrane fuel cells. J. Mater. Chem. A 9(11), 6841–6850 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta12571g
  33. Y. Jia, X. Hou, Z. Wang, X. Hu, Machine learning boosts the design and discovery of nanomaterials. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9(18), 6130–6147 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c00483
  34. J. Thiyagalingam, M. Shankar, G. Fox, T. Hey, Scientific machine learning benchmarks. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4(6), 413–420 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00441-7
  35. X. Zhang, Y. Tian, L. Chen, X. Hu, Z. Zhou, Machine learning: a new paradigm in computational electrocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 13(34), 7920–7930 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.2c01710
  36. R. Pederson, B. Kalita, K. Burke, Machine learning and density functional theory. Nat. Rev. Phys. 4(6), 357–358 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-022-00470-2
  37. J.A. Keith, V. Vassilev-Galindo, B. Cheng, S. Chmiela, M. Gastegger et al., Combining machine learning and computational chemistry for predictive insights into chemical systems. Chem. Rev. 121(16), 9816–9872 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107
  38. O.A. von Lilienfeld, K.-R. Müller, A. Tkatchenko, Exploring chemical compound space with quantum-based machine learning. Nat. Rev. Chem. 4(7), 347–358 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-020-0189-9
  39. F. Strieth-Kalthoff, F. Sandfort, M.H.S. Segler, F. Glorius, Machine learning the ropes: principles, applications and directions in synthetic chemistry. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49(17), 6154–6168 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cs00786e
  40. Y. Chen, S. Wang, J. Xiong, G. Wu, J. Gao et al., Identifying facile material descriptors for charpy impact toughness in low-alloy steel via machine learning. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 132, 213–222 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2022.05.051
  41. Y. Liu, O.C. Esan, Z. Pan, L. An, Machine learning for advanced energy materials. Energy and AI 3, 100049 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyai.2021.100049
  42. K. Gulati, S. Saravana Kumar, R. Sarath Kumar Boddu, K. Sarvakar, D. Kumar Sharma et al., Comparative analysis of machine learning-based classification models using sentiment classification of tweets related to covid-19 pandemic. Mater. Today: Proc. 51, 38–41 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2021.04.364
  43. X. Li, S. Yi, A.B. Cundy, W. Chen, Sustainable decision-making for contaminated site risk management: a decision tree model using machine learning algorithms. J. Clean Prod. 371, 133612 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.133612
  44. Y. Lai, Z. Zhang, Z. Zhang, Y. Tan, L. Yu et al., Electronic modulation of Pt nanoclusters through tuning the interface of Pt-SnO2 clusters for enhanced hydrogen evolution catalysis. Chem. Eng. J. 435, 135102 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.135102
  45. M. Tamtaji, H. Gao, M.D. Hossain, P.R. Galligan, H. Wong et al., Machine learning for design principles for single atom catalysts towards electrochemical reactions. J. Mater. Chem. A 10(29), 15309–15331 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ta02039d
  46. Z. Xu, G. Zhu, N. Metawa, Q. Zhou, Machine learning based customer meta-combination brand equity analysis for marketing behavior evaluation. Inform. Process Manag. 59(1), 102800 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2021.102800
  47. Y. Ding, L. Fan, X. Liu, Analysis of feature matrix in machine learning algorithms to predict energy consumption of public buildings. Energy Build. 249, 111208 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111208
  48. J. Li, L. Liu, T.D. Le, J. Liu, Accurate data-driven prediction does not mean high reproducibility. Nat. Mach. Intell. 2(1), 13–15 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0140-2
  49. M. Meuwly, Machine learning for chemical reactions. Chem. Rev. 121(16), 10218–10239 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00033
  50. W. Sha, Y. Li, S. Tang, J. Tian, Y. Zhao et al., Machine learning in polymer informatics. InfoMat 3(4), 353–361 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/inf2.12167
  51. A. Bender, N. Schneider, M. Segler, W. Patrick Walters, O. Engkvist et al., Evaluation guidelines for machine learning tools in the chemical sciences. Nat. Rev. Chem. 6(6), 428–442 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-022-00391-9
  52. C. Gao, X. Min, M. Fang, T. Tao, X. Zheng et al., Innovative materials science via machine learning. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32(1), 2108044 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202108044
  53. V. Venkatraman, P.A. Carvalho, On the value of popular crystallographic databases for machine learning prediction of space groups. Acta Mater. 240, 118353 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2022.118353
  54. R.M. Geilhufe, B. Olsthoorn, A.V. Balatsky, Shifting computational boundaries for complex organic materials. Nat. Phys. 17(2), 152–154 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-020-01135-6
  55. Y. Iwasaki, R. Sawada, E. Saitoh, M. Ishida, Machine learning autonomous identification of magnetic alloys beyond the slater-pauling limit. Commun. Mater. 2(1), 31 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s43246-021-00135-0
  56. Q. Tao, P. Xu, M. Li, W. Lu, Machine learning for perovskite materials design and discovery. npj Comput. Mater. 7(1), 23 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00495-8
  57. A.S. Rosen, S.M. Iyer, D. Ray, Z. Yao, A. Aspuru-Guzik et al., Machine learning the quantum-chemical properties of metal-organic frameworks for accelerated materials discovery. Matter 4(5), 1578–1597 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matt.2021.02.015
  58. N. Zhang, B. Yang, K. Liu, H. Li, G. Chen et al., Machine learning in screening high performance electrocatalysts for CO2 reduction. Small Methods 5(11), 2100987 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202100987
  59. J. Cai, X. Chu, K. Xu, H. Li, J. Wei, Machine learning-driven new material discovery. Nanoscale Adv. 2(8), 3115–3130 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0na00388c
  60. A.A.B. Baloch, S.M. Alqahtani, F. Mumtaz, A.H. Muqaibel, S.N. Rashkeev et al., Extending shannon’s ionic radii database using machine learning. Phys. Rev. Mater. 5(4), 043804 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.5.043804
  61. P. Nguyen, D. Loveland, J.T. Kim, P. Karande, A.M. Hiszpanski et al., Predicting energetics materials’ crystalline density from chemical structure by machine learning. J. Chem. Inf. Model 61(5), 2147–2158 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c01318
  62. C. Backes, S. Bartus, C. Casiraghi, A. Ferrari, A.R. Kamali et al., Applications in opto-electronics: general discussion. Faraday Discuss. 227, 184–188 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1fd90006d
  63. K.T. Winther, M.J. Hoffmann, J.R. Boes, O. Mamun, M. Bajdich et al., Catalysis-hub.Org, an open electronic structure database for surface reactions. Sci. Data 6(1), 75 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-019-0081-y
  64. E. Komp, N. Janulaitis, S. Valleau, Progress towards machine learning reaction rate constants. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24(5), 2692–2705 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cp04422b
  65. J. Deng, J. Pan, Y.F. Zhang, S. Du, Database construction of two-dimensional charged building blocks for functional-oriented material design. Nano Lett. 23(10), 4634–4641 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.3c01237
  66. A. Tropsha, K.C. Mills, A.J. Hickey, Reproducibility, sharing and progress in nanomaterial databases. Nature nanotech. 12(12), 1111–1114 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2017.233
  67. F.A. Rasmussen, K.S. Thygesen, Computational 2D materials database: electronic structure of transition-metal dichalcogenides and oxides. J. Phys. Chem. C 119(23), 13169–13183 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.5b02950
  68. H. Lu, X. Ma, Hybrid decision tree-based machine learning models for short-term water quality prediction. Chemosphere 249, 126169 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2020.126169
  69. A. Mahmood, J.-L. Wang, Machine learning for high performance organic solar cells: current scenario and future prospects. Energy Environ. Sci. 14(1), 90–105 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee02838j
  70. Y. Zhang, P.J. Thorburn, Handling missing data in near real-time environmental monitoring: a system and a review of selected methods. Future Gener. Comp. Sy. 128, 63–72 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2021.09.033
  71. S.K. Baduge, S. Thilakarathna, J.S. Perera, M. Arashpour, P. Sharafi et al., Artificial intelligence and smart vision for building and construction 4.0: machine and deep learning methods and applications. Automat. Constr. 141, 104440 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.autcon.2022.104440
  72. A. Turetskyy, J. Wessel, C. Herrmann, S. Thiede, Battery production design using multi-output machine learning models. Energy Storage Mater. 38, 93–112 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2021.03.002
  73. S. Guo, J. Popp, T. Bocklitz, Chemometric analysis in Raman spectroscopy from experimental design to machine learning-based modeling. Nat. Protoc. 16(12), 5426–5459 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41596-021-00620-3
  74. W. Zhao, H. Zhang, J. Zheng, Y. Dai, L. Huang et al., A point prediction method based automatic machine learning for day-ahead power output of multi-region photovoltaic plants. Energy 223, 120026 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.120026
  75. Z. Yao, Y. Lum, A. Johnston, L.M. Mejia-Mendoza, X. Zhou et al., Machine learning for a sustainable energy future. Nat. Rev. Mater. 8(3), 202–215 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41578-022-00490-5
  76. D. Roman, S. Saxena, V. Robu, M. Pecht, D. Flynn, Machine learning pipeline for battery state-of-health estimation. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3(5), 447–456 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00312-3
  77. B. Wang, F. Zhang, Main descriptors to correlate structures with the performances of electrocatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61(4), 2111026 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202111026
  78. M. Ducamp, F.-X. Coudert, Prediction of thermal properties of zeolites through machine learning. J. Phys. Chem. C 126(3), 1651–1660 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c09737
  79. S. Liu, B.B. Kappes, B. Amin-ahmadi, O. Benafan, X. Zhang et al., Physics-informed machine learning for composition-process-property design: shape memory alloy demonstration. Appl. Mater. Today 22, 100898 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100898
  80. L. Zhang, J. Wen, Y. Li, J. Chen, Y. Ye et al., A review of machine learning in building load prediction. Appl. Energy 285, 116452 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116452
  81. W. Li, N. Sengupta, P. Dechent, D. Howey, A. Annaswamy et al., Online capacity estimation of lithium-ion batteries with deep long short-term memory networks. J. Power Sources 482, 228863 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2020.228863
  82. D.P. Finegan, J. Zhu, X. Feng, M. Keyser, M. Ulmefors et al., The application of data-driven methods and physics-based learning for improving battery safety. Joule 5(2), 316–329 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.11.018
  83. J. Westermayr, M. Gastegger, M. Menger, S. Mai, L. Gonzalez et al., Machine learning enables long time scale molecular photodynamics simulations. Chem. Sci. 10(35), 8100–8107 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9sc01742a
  84. Y. Xu, D. Verma, R.P. Sheridan, A. Liaw, J. Ma et al., Deep dive into machine learning models for protein engineering. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 60(6), 2773–2790 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.0c00073
  85. A. Harari, G. Katz, Automatic features generation and selection from external sources: a DBpedia use case. Inform. Sci. 582, 398–414 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.09.036
  86. J. Xiong, S.-Q. Shi, T.-Y. Zhang, Machine learning of phases and mechanical properties in complex concentrated alloys. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 87, 133–142 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2021.01.054
  87. C. Janiesch, P. Zschech, K. Heinrich, Machine learning and deep learning. Electron. Mark. 31(3), 685–695 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-021-00475-2
  88. B.B. Gupta, K. Yadav, I. Razzak, K. Psannis, A. Castiglione et al., A novel approach for phishing urls detection using lexical based machine learning in a real-time environment. Comput. Commun. 175, 47–57 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2021.04.023
  89. D.S. Wigh, J.M. Goodman, A.A. Lapkin, A review of molecular representation in the age of machine learning. WIREs Comput. Mol. Sci. 12(5), 1603 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/wcms.1603
  90. G.G.C. Peterson, J. Brgoch, Materials discovery through machine learning formation energy. J. Phys. Energy 3(2), 022002 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/2515-7655/abe425
  91. S.Y. Louis, Y. Zhao, A. Nasiri, X. Wang, Y. Song et al., Graph convolutional neural networks with global attention for improved materials property prediction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 22(32), 18141–18148 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cp01474e
  92. M. Sun, T. Wu, A.W. Dougherty, M. Lam, B. Huang et al., Self-validated machine learning study of graphdiyne-based dual atomic catalyst. Adv. Energy Mater. 11(13), 2003796 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202003796
  93. K. Fukami, R. Maulik, N. Ramachandra, K. Fukagata, K. Taira, Global field reconstruction from sparse sensors with voronoi tessellation-assisted deep learning. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3(11), 945–951 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-021-00402-2
  94. H. Mai, T.C. Le, D. Chen, D.A. Winkler, R.A. Caruso, Machine learning for electrocatalyst and photocatalyst design and discovery. Chem. Rev. 122(16), 13478–13515 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.2c00061
  95. A. Mosallanezhad, C. Wei, P. Ahmadian Koudakan, Y. Fang, S. Niu et al., Interfacial synergies between single-atomic Pt and CoS for enhancing hydrogen evolution reaction catalysis. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 315, 121534 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121534
  96. R. Ding, Y. Chen, P. Chen, R. Wang, J. Wang et al., Machine learning-guided discovery of underlying decisive factors and new mechanisms for the design of nonprecious metal electrocatalysts. ACS Catal. 11(15), 9798–9808 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c01473
  97. M. Zhong, K. Tran, Y. Min, C. Wang, Z. Wang et al., Accelerated discovery of CO2 electrocatalysts using active machine learning. Nature 581(7807), 178–183 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2242-8
  98. L. Chen, X. Zhang, A. Chen, S. Yao, X. Hu et al., Targeted design of advanced electrocatalysts by machine learning. Chinese J. Catal. 43(1), 11–32 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-2067(21)63852-4
  99. M. Umer, S. Umer, M. Zafari, M. Ha, R. Anand et al., Machine learning assisted high-throughput screening of transition metal single atom based superb hydrogen evolution electrocatalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 10(12), 6679–6689 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ta09878k
  100. L. Giordano, K. Akkiraju, R. Jacobs, D. Vivona, D. Morgan et al., Electronic structure-based descriptors for oxide properties and functions. Acc. Chem. Res. 55(3), 298–308 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.1c00509
  101. L. Chen, Y. Tian, X. Hu, S. Yao, Z. Lu et al., A universal machine learning framework for electrocatalyst innovation: a case study of discovering alloys for hydrogen evolution reaction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32(47), 2208418 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202208418
  102. M.O.J. Jäger, E.V. Morooka, F. Federici Canova, L. Himanen, A.S. Foster, Machine learning hydrogen adsorption on nanoclusters through structural descriptors. npj Comput. Mater. 4(1), 37 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-018-0096-5
  103. S. Jiao, X. Fu, H. Huang, Descriptors for the evaluation of electrocatalytic reactions: D-band theory and beyond. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32(4), 2107651 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202107651
  104. S. Lu, J. Cao, Y. Zhang, F. Lou, Z. Yu, Transition metal single-atom supported on PC3 monolayer for highly efficient hydrogen evolution reaction by combined density functional theory and machine learning study. Appl. Surf. Sci. 606, 154945 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.154945
  105. C. Zou, J. Li, W.Y. Wang, Y. Zhang, D. Lin et al., Integrating data mining and machine learning to discover high-strength ductile titanium alloys. Acta Mater. 202, 211–221 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actamat.2020.10.056
  106. P.O. Dral, M. Barbatti, Molecular excited states through a machine learning lens. Nat. Rev. Chem. 5(6), 388–405 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41570-021-00278-1
  107. C. Altintas, O.F. Altundal, S. Keskin, R. Yildirim, Machine learning meets with metal organic frameworks for gas storage and separation. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 61(5), 2131–2146 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jcim.1c00191
  108. A. Nandy, C. Duan, M.G. Taylor, F. Liu, A.H. Steeves et al., Computational discovery of transition-metal complexes: from high-throughput screening to machine learning. Chem. Rev. 121(16), 9927–10000 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00347
  109. C. Lv, X. Zhou, L. Zhong, C. Yan, M. Srinivasan et al., Machine learning: an advanced platform for materials development and state prediction in lithium-ion batteries. Adv. Mater. 34(25), 2101474 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202101474
  110. D. Lemm, G.F. von Rudorff, O.A. von Lilienfeld, Machine learning based energy-free structure predictions of molecules, transition states, and solids. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 4468 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-24525-7
  111. Y. Guan, C.W. Coley, H. Wu, D. Ranasinghe, E. Heid et al., Regio-selectivity prediction with a machine-learned reaction representation and on-the-fly quantum mechanical descriptors. Chem. Sci. 12(6), 2198–2208 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0sc04823b
  112. K. Choudhary, B. DeCost, C. Chen, A. Jain, F. Tavazza et al., Recent advances and applications of deep learning methods in materials science. npj Comput. Mater. 8(1), 59 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-022-00734-6
  113. T.H. Pham, Y. Qiu, J. Zeng, L. Xie, P. Zhang, A deep learning framework for high-throughput mechanism-driven phenotype compound screening and its application to covid-19 drug repurposing. Nat. Mach. Intell. 3(3), 247–257 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-020-00285-9
  114. J. Tian, R. Xiong, W. Shen, J. Lu, F. Sun, Flexible battery state of health and state of charge estimation using partial charging data and deep learning. Energy Storage Mater. 51, 372–381 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ensm.2022.06.053
  115. Y. Li, C. Huang, L. Ding, Z. Li, Y. Pan et al., Deep learning in bioinformatics: introduction, application, and perspective in the big data era. Methods 166, 4–21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2019.04.008
  116. Y. Ji, S. Ma, S. Lv, Y. Wang, S. Lu et al., Nanomaterials for targeted delivery of agrochemicals by an all-in-one combination strategy and deep learning. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 13(36), 43374–43386 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.1c11914
  117. H. Masood, C.Y. Toe, W.Y. Teoh, V. Sethu, R. Amal, Machine learning for accelerated discovery of solar photocatalysts. ACS Catal. 9(12), 11774–11787 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b02531
  118. G. Pan, F. Wang, C. Shang, H.-H. Wu, G. Wu et al., Advances in machine learning- and artificial intelligence-assisted material design of steels. Int. J. Min. Met. Mater. 30, 1003–1024 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12613-022-2595-0
  119. S. Manna, D. Roy, S. Das, B. Pathak, Capacity prediction of K-ion batteries: a machine learning based approach for high throughput screening of electrode materials. Mater. Adv. 3(21), 7833–7845 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ma00746k
  120. T. Gao, W. Lu, Machine learning toward advanced energy storage devices and systems. iScience 24(1), 101936 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2020.101936
  121. Y. Guan, D. Chaffart, G. Liu, Z. Tan, D. Zhang et al., Machine learning in solid heterogeneous catalysis: recent developments, challenges and perspectives. Chem. Eng. Sci. 248, 117224 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2021.117224
  122. P.S. Rice, Z.P. Liu, P. Hu, Hydrogen coupling on platinum using artificial neural network potentials and DFT. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 12(43), 10637–10645 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpclett.1c02998
  123. H.-H. Wu, L.-S. Dong, S.-Z. Wang, G.-L. Wu, J.-H. Gao et al., Local chemical ordering coordinated thermal stability of nanograined high-entropy alloys. Rare Met. 42(5), 1645–1655 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-022-02194-9
  124. F. Wang, H.-H. Wu, L. Dong, G. Pan, X. Zhou et al., Atomic-scale simulations in multi-component alloys and compounds: a review on advances in interatomic potential. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 165, 49–65 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2023.05.010
  125. S. Mehrabi-Kalajahi, A.O. Moghaddam, F. Hadavimoghaddam, M.A. Varfolomeev, A.L. Zinnatullin et al., Entropy-stabilized metal oxide nanops supported on reduced graphene oxide as a highly active heterogeneous catalyst for selective and solvent-free oxidation of toluene: a combined experimental and numerical investigation. J. Mater. Chem. A 10(27), 14488–14500 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ta02027k
  126. Y. Zhang, T.C. Peck, G.K. Reddy, D. Banerjee, H. Jia et al., Descriptor-free design of multicomponent catalysts. ACS Catal. 12(17), 10562–10571 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.2c02807
  127. K.E. McCullough, D.S. King, S.P. Chheda, M.S. Ferrandon, T.A. Goetjen et al., High-throughput experimentation, theoretical modeling, and human intuition: lessons learned in metal-organic-framework-supported catalyst design. ACS Cent. Sci. 9(2), 266–276 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.2c01422
  128. A. Chen, J. Cai, Z. Wang, Y. Han, S. Ye et al., An ensemble learning classifier to discover arsenene catalysts with implanted heteroatoms for hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Energy Chem. 78, 268–276 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2022.11.035
  129. Z. Yang, W. Gao, Applications of machine learning in alloy catalysts: rational selection and future development of descriptors. Adv. Sci. 9(12), 2106043 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202106043
  130. Z. Xiong, Y. Cui, Z. Liu, Y. Zhao, M. Hu et al., Evaluating explorative prediction power of machine learning algorithms for materials discovery using k-fold forward cross-validation. Comput. Mater. Sci. 171, 109203 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2019.109203
  131. D. Perez-Guaita, G. Quintas, J. Kuligowski, Discriminant analysis and feature selection in mass spectrometry imaging using constrained repeated random sampling-cross validation (corrs-cv). Anal. Chim. Acta 1097, 30–36 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2019.10.039
  132. S.Y. Ho, K. Phua, L. Wong, W.W. Bin Goh, Extensions of the external validation for checking learned model interpretability and generalizability. Patterns 1(8), 100129 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patter.2020.100129
  133. N.O. Dogan, U. Bozuyuk, P. Erkoc, A.C. Karacakol, A. Cingoz et al., Parameters influencing gene delivery efficiency of pegylated chitosan nanops: experimental and modeling approach. Adv. NanoBiomed Res. 2(1), 2100033 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anbr.202100033
  134. M. Karthikeyan, D.M. Mahapatra, A.S.A. Razak, A.A.M. Abahussain, B. Ethiraj et al., Machine learning aided synthesis and screening of HER catalyst: present developments and prospects. Catal. Rev. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/01614940.2022.2103980
  135. D. Sui, M. Yao, L. Si, K. Yan, J. Shi et al., Biomass-derived carbon coated SiO2 nanotubes as superior anode for lithium-ion batteries. Carbon 205, 510–518 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2023.01.039
  136. G. Liu, T. Zhang, X. Li, J. Li, N. Wu et al., MoS2@C with S vacancies vertically anchored onV2C-MXene for efficient lithium and sodium storage. Inorg. Chem. Front. 10(5), 1587–1602 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2qi02389j
  137. Y. Liu, P. Vijayakumar, Q. Liu, T. Sakthivel, F. Chen et al., Shining light on anion-mixed nanocatalysts for efficient water electrolysis: fundamentals, progress, and perspectives. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 43 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00785-2
  138. C. Wang, X. Wei, D. Ren, X. Wang, W. Xu, High-throughput map design of creep life in low-alloy steels by integrating machine learning with a genetic algorithm. Mater. Design 213, 110326 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2021.110326
  139. Z. Liu, S. Ha, Y. Liu, F. Wang, F. Tao et al., Application of Ag-based materials in high-performance lithium metal anode: a review. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 133, 165–182 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmst.2022.06.015
  140. X. Zhao, H. Qiu, Y. Shao, P. Wang, S. Yu et al., Silver nanop-modified 2D MOF nanosheets for photothermally enhanced silver ion release antibacterial treatment. Acta Phys-Chim. Sin. 1, 2211043 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3866/pku.whxb202211043
  141. L. Wu, T. Guo, T. Li, Machine learning-accelerated prediction of overpotential of oxygen evolution reaction of single-atom catalysts. iScience 24(5), 102398 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102398
  142. M. Kim, M.Y. Ha, W.B. Jung, J. Yoon, E. Shin et al., Searching for an optimal multi-metallic alloy catalyst by active learning combined with experiments. Adv. Mater. 34(19), 2108900 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202108900
  143. Y.L. Wu, X. Li, Y.S. Wei, Z. Fu, W. Wei et al., Ordered macroporous superstructure of nitrogen-doped nanoporous carbon implanted with ultrafine Ru nanoclusters for efficient pH-universal hydrogen evolution reaction. Adv. Mater. 33(12), 2006965 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202006965
  144. Y. Xu, R. Wang, J. Wang, J. Li, T. Jiao et al., Facile fabrication of molybdenum compounds (Mo2C, MoP and MoS2) nanoclusters supported on N-doped reduced graphene oxide for highly efficient hydrogen evolution reaction over broad pH range. Chem. Eng. J. 417, 129233 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.129233
  145. Y. Li, Y. Luo, Z. Zhang, Q. Yu, C. Li et al., Implanting Ru nanoclusters into N-doped graphene for efficient alkaline hydrogen evolution. Carbon 183, 362–367 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2021.07.039
  146. C. Li, H. Jang, S. Liu, M.G. Kim, L. Hou et al., P and Mo dual doped Ru ultrasmall nanoclusters embedded in P-doped porous carbon toward efficient hydrogen evolution reaction. Adv. Energy Mater. 12(23), 2200029 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202200029
  147. M.O.J. Jager, Y.S. Ranawat, F.F. Canova, E.V. Morooka, A.S. Foster, Efficient machine-learning-aided screening of hydrogen adsorption on bimetallic nanoclusters. ACS Comb. Sci. 22(12), 768–781 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscombsci.0c00102
  148. D.X. Zhu, K.M. Pan, Y. Wu, X.Y. Zhou, X.Y. Li et al., Improved material descriptors for bulk modulus in intermetallic compounds via machine learning. Rare Met. 42, 2396–2405 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12598-023-02282-4
  149. X. Mao, L. Wang, Y. Xu, P. Wang, Y. Li et al., Computational high-throughput screening of alloy nanoclusters for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. npj Comput. Mater. 7(1), 46 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-021-00514-8
  150. Q. Yang, H. Liu, P. Yuan, Y. Jia, L. Zhuang et al., Single carbon vacancy traps atomic platinum for hydrogen evolution catalysis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 144(5), 2171–2178 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.1c10814
  151. H. Prats, K. Chan, The determination of the HOR/HER reaction mechanism from experimental kinetic data. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 23(48), 27150–27158 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cp04134g
  152. A. Gross, S. Sakong, Ab initio simulations of water/metal interfaces. Chem. Rev. 122(12), 10746–10776 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00679
  153. S.M.N. Jeghan, D. Kim, Y. Lee, M. Kim, G. Lee, Designing a smart heterojunction coupling of cobalt-iron layered double hydroxide on nickel selenide nanosheets for highly efficient overall water splitting kinetics. Appl. Catal. B-Environ. 308, 121221 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121221
  154. G.H. Gu, J. Lim, C. Wan, T. Cheng, H. Pu et al., Autobifunctional mechanism of jagged Pt nanowires for hydrogen evolution kinetics via end-to-end simulation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 143(14), 5355–5363 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.0c11261
  155. H. Jin, H. Yu, H. Li, K. Davey, T. Song et al., MXene analogue: a 2D nitridene solid solution for high-rate hydrogen production. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61(27), 2203850 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202203850
  156. R. Kronberg, H. Lappalainen, K. Laasonen, Hydrogen adsorption on defective nitrogen-doped carbon nanotubes explained via machine learning augmented DFT calculations and game-theoretic feature attributions. J. Phys. Chem. C 125(29), 15918–15933 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.1c03858
  157. J. Mao, J. Miao, Y. Lu, Z. Tong, Machine learning of materials design and state prediction for lithium ion batteries. Chinese J. Chem. Eng. 37, 1–11 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2021.04.009
  158. H. Jin, T. Song, U. Paik, S.-Z. Qiao, Metastable two-dimensional materials for electrocatalytic energy conversions. Accounts Mater. Res. 2(7), 559–573 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/accountsmr.1c00115
  159. Y. Ding, M. Zeng, Q. Zheng, J. Zhang, D. Xu et al., Bidirectional and reversible tuning of the interlayer spacing of two-dimensional materials. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 5886 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-26139-5
  160. H.S. Kim, Computational design of a switchable heterostructure electrocatalyst based on a two-dimensional ferroelectric In2Se3 material for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 9(19), 11553–11562 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta09738a
  161. L. Najafi, R. Oropesa-Nunez, S. Bellani, B. Martin-Garcia, L. Pasquale et al., Topochemical transformation of two-dimensional VSe2 into metallic nonlayered VO2 for water splitting reactions in acidic and alkaline media. ACS Nano 16(1), 351–367 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.1c06662
  162. Y. Cui, X. Guo, J. Zhang, X. Li, X. Zhu et al., Di-defects synergy boost electrocatalysis hydrogen evolution over two-dimensional heterojunctions. Nano Res. 15(1), 677–684 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-021-3545-2
  163. S. Wu, Z. Wang, H. Zhang, J. Cai, J. Li, Deep learning accelerates the discovery of two-dimensional catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Energy Environ. Mater. 1, 1–7 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.12259
  164. H. He, Y. Chen, C. Yang, L. Yang, Q. Jiang et al., Constructing 3D interweaved mxene/graphitic carbon nitride nanosheets/graphene nanoarchitectures for promoted electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J. Energy Chem. 67, 483–491 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2021.10.019
  165. C. Wang, X. Wang, T. Zhang, P. Qian, T. Lookman et al., A descriptor for the design of 2D MXene hydrogen evolution reaction electrocatalysts. J. Mater. Chem. A 10(35), 18195–18205 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d2ta02837a
  166. J. Zheng, X. Sun, C. Qiu, Y. Yan, Z. Yao et al., High-throughput screening of hydrogen evolution reaction catalysts in MXene materials. J. Phys. Chem. C 124(25), 13695–13705 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c02265
  167. X. Sun, J. Zheng, Y. Gao, C. Qiu, Y. Yan et al., Machine-learning-accelerated screening of hydrogen evolution catalysts in Mbenes materials. Appl. Surf. Sci. 526, 146522 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apsusc.2020.146522
  168. X. Wang, C. Wang, S. Ci, Y. Ma, T. Liu et al., Accelerating 2D MXene catalyst discovery for the hydrogen evolution reaction by computer-driven workflow and an ensemble learning strategy. J. Mater. Chem. A 8(44), 23488–23497 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta06583h
  169. R. Liu, Z. Gong, J. Liu, J. Dong, J. Liao et al., Design of aligned porous carbon films with single-atom Co-N-C sites for high-current-density hydrogen generation. Adv. Mater. 33(41), 2103533 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202103533
  170. A. Baby, L. Trovato, C. Di Valentin, Single atom catalysts (SAC) trapped in defective and nitrogen-doped graphene supported on metal substrates. Carbon 174, 772–788 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.carbon.2020.12.045
  171. H. Choi, D.H. Kim, M.H. Han, H.-S. Oh, J. Heo et al., Prediction of the catalytic site of single-atom Ni catalyst using the hydrogen evolution reaction as a model platform. Electrochim. Acta 431, 141138 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2022.141138
  172. C. Rong, X. Shen, Y. Wang, L. Thomsen, T. Zhao et al., Electronic structure engineering of single-atom Ru sites via Co-N4 sites for bifunctional pH-universal water splitting. Adv. Mater. 34(21), 2110103 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202110103
  173. T. Jin, X. Liu, Q. Gao, H. Zhu, C. Lian et al., Pyrolysis-free, facile mechanochemical strategy toward cobalt single-atom/nitrogen-doped carbon for highly efficient water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 433, 134089 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.134089
  174. V. Fung, G. Hu, Z. Wu, D.-E. Jiang, Descriptors for hydrogen evolution on single atom catalysts in nitrogen-doped graphene. J. Phys. Chem. C 124(36), 19571–19578 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c04432
  175. S. Lin, H. Xu, Y. Wang, X.C. Zeng, Z. Chen, Directly predicting limiting potentials from easily obtainable physical properties of graphene-supported single-atom electrocatalysts by machine learning. J. Mater. Chem. A 8(11), 5663–5670 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta13404b
  176. M. Sun, A.W. Dougherty, B. Huang, Y. Li, C.H. Yan, Accelerating atomic catalyst discovery by theoretical calculations-machine learning strategy. Adv. Energy Mater. 10(12), 1903949 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201903949
  177. C. Guo, T. Zhang, X. Lu, C.L. Wu, Rational design and effective control of gold-based bimetallic electrocatalyst for boosting CO2 reduction reaction: a first-principles study. Chemsuschem 14(13), 2731–2739 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.202100785
  178. H. Li, S. Xu, M. Wang, Z. Chen, F. Ji et al., Computational design of (100) alloy surfaces for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 8(35), 17987–17997 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta04615a
  179. H. Liu, K. Liu, P. Zhong, J. Qi, J. Bian et al., Ultrathin Pt-Ag alloy nanotubes with regular nanopores for enhanced electrocatalytic activity. Chem. Mater. 30(21), 7744–7751 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b03085
  180. H. Wu, F. Zhuo, H. Qiao, L. Kodumudi Venkataraman, M. Zheng et al., Polymer-/ceramic-based dielectric composites for energy storage and conversion. Energy Environ. Mater. 5(2), 486–514 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.12237
  181. L. Ding, Z. Xie, S. Yu, W. Wang, A.Y. Terekhov et al., Electrochemically grown ultrathin platinum nanosheet electrodes with ultralow loadings for energy-saving and industrial-level hydrogen evolution. Nano-Micro Lett. 15(1), 144 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01117-2
  182. J. Chen, Y. Ha, R. Wang, Y. Liu, H. Xu et al., Inner Co synergizing outer Ru supported on carbon nanotubes for efficient pH-universal hydrogen evolution catalysis. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 186 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00933-2
  183. Z. Wu, T. Liao, S. Wang, J.A. Mudiyanselage, A.S. Micallef et al., Conversion of catalytically inert 2D bismuth oxide nanosheets for effective electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction catalysis via oxygen vacancy concentration modulation. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 90 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00832-6
  184. Y. Sun, Z. Xue, Q. Liu, Y. Jia, Y. Li et al., Modulating electronic structure of metal-organic frameworks by introducing atomically dispersed Ru for efficient hydrogen evolution. Nat. Commun. 12(1), 1369 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-21595-5
  185. Y. Gao, J. Wang, Y. Yang, J. Wang, C. Zhang et al., Engineering spin states of isolated copper species in a metal-organic framework improves urea electrosynthesis. Nano-Micro Lett. 15(1), 158 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01127-0
  186. X. He, Fundamental perspectives on the electrochemical water applications of metal-organic frameworks. Nano-Micro Lett. 15(1), 148 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01124-3
Read More
Author biographies are not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 3030 Download : 2286

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>