Issue

Vol. 15 (2023)

Facet Engineering of Advanced Electrocatalysts Toward Hydrogen/Oxygen Evolution Reactions

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01024-6
Changshui Wang
International Innovation Center for Forest Chemicals and Materials, Co‑Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, People’s Republic of China
Qian Zhang
International Innovation Center for Forest Chemicals and Materials, Co‑Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, People’s Republic of China
Bing Yan
International Innovation Center for Forest Chemicals and Materials, Co‑Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, People’s Republic of China
Bo You
Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry for Energy Conversion and Storage, Ministry of Education, Hubei Key Laboratory of Material Chemistry and Service Failure, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Huazhong University of Science and Technology (HUST), Wuhan 430074, People’s Republic of China
Jiaojiao Zheng
International Innovation Center for Forest Chemicals and Materials, Co‑Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, People’s Republic of China
Li Feng
International Innovation Center for Forest Chemicals and Materials, Co‑Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, People’s Republic of China
Chunmei Zhang
Institute of Materials Science and Devices, School of Materials Science and Engineering, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 2150009, People’s Republic of China
Shaohua Jiang
International Innovation Center for Forest Chemicals and Materials, Co‑Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, People’s Republic of China
Wei Chen
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Low Carbon Energy Materials, College of Chemistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Guangxi Normal University, Guilin 541004, People’s Republic of China
Shuijian He
International Innovation Center for Forest Chemicals and Materials, Co‑Innovation Center of Efficient Processing and Utilization of Forest Resources, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, People’s Republic of China

Corresponding Author: Shuijian He

shuijianhe@njfu.edu.cn

Nano-Micro Letters, Vol. 15 (2023), Article Number: 52

Abstract

The electrocatalytic water splitting technology can generate high-purity hydrogen without emitting carbon dioxide, which is in favor of relieving environmental pollution and energy crisis and achieving carbon neutrality. Electrocatalysts can effectively reduce the reaction energy barrier and increase the reaction efficiency. Facet engineering is considered as a promising strategy in controlling the ratio of desired crystal planes on the surface. Owing to the anisotropy, crystal planes with different orientations usually feature facet-dependent physical and chemical properties, leading to differences in the adsorption energies of oxygen or hydrogen intermediates, and thus exhibit varied electrocatalytic activity toward hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER). In this review, a brief introduction of the basic concepts, fundamental understanding of the reaction mechanisms as well as key evaluating parameters for both HER and OER are provided. The formation mechanisms of the crystal facets are comprehensively overviewed aiming to give scientific theory guides to realize dominant crystal planes. Subsequently, three strategies of selective capping agent, selective etching agent, and coordination modulation to tune crystal planes are comprehensively summarized. Then, we present an overview of significant contributions of facet-engineered catalysts toward HER, OER, and overall water splitting. In particular, we highlight that density functional theory calculations play an indispensable role in unveiling the structure–activity correlation between the crystal plane and catalytic activity. Finally, the remaining challenges in facet-engineered catalysts for HER and OER are provided and future prospects for designing advanced facet-engineered electrocatalysts are discussed.


Highlights:


1 The crystal facets featured with facet-dependent physical and chemical properties can exhibit varied electrocatalytic activity toward hydrogen evolution reaction (HER) and oxygen evolution reaction (OER) attributed to their anisotropy.
2 The highly active exposed crystal facets enable increased mass activity of active sites, lower reaction energy barriers, and enhanced catalytic reaction rates for HER and OER.
3 The formation mechanism and control strategy of the crystal facet, significant contributions as well as challenges and perspectives of facet-engineered catalysts for HER and OER are provided.

Keywords

Crystal facet engineering Anisotropy Oxygen evolution reaction Hydrogen evolution reaction Theoretical simulations
Wang, Changshui, Qian Zhang, Bing Yan, Bo You, Jiaojiao Zheng, Li Feng, Chunmei Zhang, Shaohua Jiang, Wei Chen, and Shuijian He. 2023. “Facet Engineering of Advanced Electrocatalysts Toward Hydrogen/Oxygen Evolution Reactions”. Nano-Micro Letters 15 (February):52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-023-01024-6.
Download Citation
Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
BibTeX
References
  1. M. Chatenet, B.G. Pollet, D.R. Dekel, F. Dionigi, J. Deseure et al., Water electrolysis: from textbook knowledge to the latest scientific strategies and industrial developments. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51(11), 4583–4762 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs01079k
  2. D.H. Yang, Y. Tao, X. Ding, B.H. Han, Porous organic polymers for electrocatalysis. Chem. Soc. Rev. 51(2), 761–791 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cs00887k
  3. J. Zhu, L. Hu, P. Zhao, L.Y.S. Lee, K.Y. Wong, Recent advances in electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution using nanops. Chem. Rev. 120(2), 851–918 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00248
  4. Z.W. Seh, J. Kibsgaard, C.F. Dickens, I. Chorkendorff, J.K. Norskov et al., Combining theory and experiment in electrocatalysis: insights into materials design. Science 355(146), 6321–6333 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aad4998
  5. C. Du, P. Li, Z. Zhuang, Z. Fang, S. He et al., Highly porous nanostructures: rational fabrication and promising application in energy electrocatalysis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 466, 214604 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214604
  6. L. Zhang, R. Li, H. Zang, H. Tan, Z. Kang et al., Advanced hydrogen evolution electrocatalysts promising sustainable hydrogen and chlor-alkali co-production. Energy Environ. Sci. 14(12), 6191–6210 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ee02798k
  7. B. You, M.T. Tang, C. Tsai, F. Abild-Pedersen, X. Zheng et al., Enhancing electrocatalytic water splitting by strain engineering. Adv. Mater. 31(17), 1807001 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201807001
  8. B. You, X. Liu, N. Jiang, Y. Sun, A general strategy for decoupled hydrogen production from water splitting by integrating oxidative biomass valorization. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138(41), 13639–13646 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.6b07127
  9. P. Aggarwal, D. Sarkar, K. Awasthi, P.W. Menezes, Functional role of single-atom catalysts in electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution: current developments and future challenges. Coord. Chem. Rev. 452, 214289 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214289
  10. K. Chen, Z. Wang, L. Wang, X. Wu, B. Hu et al., Boron nanosheet-supported Rh catalysts for hydrogen evolution: a new territory for the strong metal-support interaction effect. Nano-Micro Lett. 13(1), 138 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00662-y
  11. L. Li, P. Wang, Q. Shao, X. Huang, Metallic nanostructures with low dimensionality for electrochemical water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49(10), 3072–3106 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs00013b
  12. Z. Zhang, X. Wu, Z. Kou, N. Song, G. Nie et al., Rational design of electrospun nanofiber-typed electrocatalysts for water splitting: a review. Chem. Eng. J. 428, 131133–131145 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.131133
  13. X. Fu, R. Shi, S. Jiao, M. Li, Q. Li, Structural design for electrocatalytic water splitting to realize industrial-scale deployment: strategies, advances, and perspectives. J. Energy Chem. 70, 129–153 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2022.02.010
  14. J.N. Hausmann, R. Schlögl, P.W. Menezes, M. Driess, Is direct seawater splitting economically meaningful? Energy Environ. Sci. 14(7), 3679–3685 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee03659e
  15. S. Sanati, A. Morsali, H. García, First-row transition metal-based materials derived from bimetallic metal-organic frameworks as highly efficient electrocatalysts for electrochemical water splitting. Energy Environ. Sci. 15, 3119 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ee03614a
  16. W. Li, C. Wang, X. Lu, Conducting polymers-derived fascinating electrocatalysts for advanced hydrogen and oxygen electrocatalysis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 464, 214555 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214555
  17. S. Jin, Are metal chalcogenides, nitrides, and phosphides oxygen evolution catalysts or bifunctional catalysts? ACS Energy Lett. 2(8), 1937–1938 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00679
  18. K. Zhu, X. Zhu, W. Yang, Application of in situ techniques for the characterization of NiFe-based oxygen evolution reaction (OER) electrocatalysts. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58(5), 1252–1265 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201802923
  19. M. Yu, E. Budiyanto, H. Tuysuz, Principles of water electrolysis and recent progress in cobalt-, nickel-, and iron-based oxides for the oxygen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 2–26 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202103824
  20. Z.P. Wu, H. Zhang, S. Zuo, Y. Wang, S.L. Zhang et al., Manipulating the local coordination and electronic structures for efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Adv. Mater. 33, 2103004 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202103004
  21. Q. Liang, J. Chen, F. Wang, Y. Li, Transition metal-based metal-organic frameworks for oxygen evolution reaction. Coord. Chem. Rev. 424, 213488 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213488
  22. H. Sun, Z. Yan, F. Liu, W. Xu, F. Cheng et al., Self-supported transition-metal-based electrocatalysts for hydrogen and oxygen evolution. Adv. Mater. 32(3), 1806326 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201806326
  23. B. You, Y. Sun, Innovative strategies for electrocatalytic water splitting. Acc. Chem. Res. 51(7), 1571–1580 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.accounts.8b00002
  24. J. Yin, J. Jin, H. Lin, Z. Yin, J. Li et al., Optimized metal chalcogenides for boosting water splitting. Adv. Sci. 7(10), 1903070 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.201903070
  25. J. Hou, Y. Wu, B. Zhang, S. Cao, Z. Li et al., Rational design of nanoarray architectures for electrocatalytic water splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29(20), 1808367 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201808367
  26. Q. Shi, C. Zhu, D. Du, Y. Lin, Robust noble metal-based electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 48(12), 3181–3192 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8cs00671g
  27. T. Kwon, T. Kim, Y. Son, K. Lee, Dopants in the design of noble metal nanop electrocatalysts and their effect on surface energy and coordination chemistry at the nanocrystal surface. Adv. Energy Mater. 11(22), 2100265 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202100265
  28. Z. Chen, X. Duan, W. Wei, S. Wang, B.J. Ni, Iridium-based nanomaterials for electrochemical water splitting. Nano Energy 78, 105270–105297 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105270
  29. J.S. Kim, B. Kim, H. Kim, K. Kang, Recent progress on multimetal oxide catalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. Adv. Energy Mater. 8(11), 1702774 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201702774
  30. C. Xiao, B.A. Lu, P. Xue, N. Tian, Z. Zhou et al., High-index-facet- and high-surface-energy nanocrystals of metals and metal oxides as highly efficient catalysts. Joule 4(12), 2562–2598 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2020.10.002
  31. L. Tian, X. Zhai, X. Wang, J. Li, Z. Li, Advances in manganese-based oxides for oxygen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 8(29), 14400–14414 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta05116k
  32. F. Song, L. Bai, A. Moysiadou, S. Lee, C. Hu et al., Transition metal oxides as electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in alkaline solutions: an application-inspired renaissance. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 140(25), 7748–7759 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.8b04546
  33. S. Anantharaj, S.R. Ede, K. Sakthikumar, K. Karthick, S. Mishra et al., Recent trends and perspectives in electrochemical water splitting with an emphasis on sulfide, selenide, and phosphide catalysts of Fe Co, and Ni: a review. ACS Catal. 6(12), 8069–8097 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.6b02479
  34. Y. Li, Z. Dong, L. Jiao, Multifunctional transition metal-based phosphides in energy-related electrocatalysis. Adv. Energy Mater. 10(11), 1902104 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201902104
  35. Z. Pu, T. Liu, I.S. Amiinu, R. Cheng, P. Wang et al., Transition-metal phosphides: activity origin, energyrelated electrocatalysis applications, and synthetic strategies. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(45), 2004009 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202004009
  36. Y. Shi, B. Zhang, Recent advances in transition metal phosphide nanomaterials: synthesis and applications in hydrogen evolution reaction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 45(6), 1529–1541 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cs00434a
  37. Y. Wang, B. Kong, D. Zhao, H. Wang, C. Selomulya, Strategies for developing transition metal phosphides as heterogeneous electrocatalysts for water splitting. Nano Today 15, 26–55 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nantod.2017.06.006
  38. Y. Zhang, Q. Zhou, J. Zhu, Q. Yan, S.X. Dou et al., Nanostructured metal chalcogenides for energy storage and electrocatalysis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 27(35), 1702317–1702350 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201702317
  39. X. Wu, H. Zhang, J. Zhang, X.W. Lou, Recent advances on transition metal dichalcogenides for electrochemical energy conversion. Adv. Mater. 33, 2008376 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202008376
  40. M.R. Gao, Y.F. Xu, J. Jiang, S.H. Yu, Nanostructured metal chalcogenides: synthesis, modification, and applications in energy conversion and storage devices. Chem. Soc. Rev. 42(7), 2986–3017 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cs35310e
  41. D. Kong, J.J. Cha, H. Wang, H.R. Lee, Y. Cui, First-row transition metal dichalcogenide catalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Energy Environ. Sci. 6(12), 3553–3558 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3ee42413h
  42. P. Yu, F. Wang, T.A. Shifa, X. Zhan, X. Lou et al., Earth abundant materials beyond transition metal dichalcogenides: a focus on electrocatalyzing hydrogen evolution reaction. Nano Energy 58, 244–276 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.01.017
  43. C.C. Hou, Q. Xu, Metal-organic frameworks for energy. Adv. Energy Mater. 9(23), 1801307 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201801307
  44. Z. Li, R. Gao, M. Feng, Y.P. Deng, D. Xiao et al., Modulating metal-organic frameworks as advanced oxygen electrocatalysts. Adv. Energy Mater. 11(16), 2003291 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202003291
  45. J. Du, F. Li, L. Sun, Metal-organic frameworks and their derivatives as electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50(4), 2663–2695 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs01191f
  46. L. Jiao, J.Y.R. Seow, W.S. Skinner, Z.U. Wang, H.L. Jiang, Metal-organic frameworks: structures and functional applications. Mater. Today 27, 43–68 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2018.10.038
  47. N. Jiang, B. You, M. Sheng, Y. Sun, Electrodeposited cobalt–phosphorous-derived films as competent bifunctional catalysts for overall water splitting. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 54(21), 6251–6254 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201501616
  48. B. You, Y. Zhang, Y. Jiao, K. Davey, S.Z. Qiao, Negative charging of transition-metal phosphides via strong electronic coupling for destabilization of alkaline water. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 58(34), 11796–11800 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201906683
  49. B. You, X. Liu, G. Hu, S. Gul, J. Yano et al., Universal surface engineering of transition metals for superior electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution in neutral water. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(35), 12283–12290 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b06434
  50. J. Shan, Y. Zheng, B. Shi, K. Davey, S.Z. Qiao, Regulating electrocatalysts via surface and interface engineering for acidic water electrooxidation. ACS Energy Lett. 4(11), 2719–2730 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01758
  51. Q. Shao, P. Wang, X. Huang, Opportunities and challenges of interface engineering in bimetallic nanostructure for enhanced electrocatalysis. Adv. Funct. Mater. 29(3), 1806419 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201806419
  52. Z. Yin, X. Liu, S. Chen, T. Ma, Y. Li, Interface engineering and anion engineering of Mo-based heterogeneous electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. Energy Environ. Mater. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/eem2.12310
  53. Y. Huang, L.W. Jiang, B.Y. Shi, K.M. Ryan, J.J. Wang, Highly efficient oxygen evolution reaction enabled by phosphorus doping of the Fe electronic structure in iron-nickel selenide nanosheets. Adv. Sci. 8(18), 2101775 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202101775
  54. K. Zhao, W. Yang, L. Li, S. Wang, L. Wang et al., Discharge induced-activation of phosphorus-doped nickel oxyhydroxide for oxygen evolution reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 435, 135049–135057 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2022.135049
  55. H. Sun, W. Jung, Recent advances in doped ruthenium oxides as high-efficiency electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 9(28), 15506–15521 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ta03452a
  56. S. Huang, Z. Jin, P. Ning, C. Gao, Y. Wu et al., Synergistically modulating electronic structure of NiS2 hierarchical architectures by phosphorus doping and sulfur-vacancies defect engineering enables efficient electrocatalytic water splitting. Chem. Eng. J. 420, 127630–127641 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.127630
  57. Y. Zhu, X. Liu, S. Jin, H. Chen, W. Lee et al., Anionic defect engineering of transition metal oxides for oxygen reduction and evolution reactions. J. Mater. Chem. A 7(11), 5875–5897 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ta12477a
  58. C. Xie, D. Yan, W. Chen, Y. Zou, R. Chen et al., Insight into the design of defect electrocatalysts: from electronic structure to adsorption energy. Mater. Today 31, 47–68 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2019.05.021
  59. P. Wang, Y. Luo, G. Zhang, Z. Chen, H. Ranganathan et al., Interface engineering of NixSy@MnOxHy nanorods to efficiently enhance overall-water-splitting activity and stability. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 120–136 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00860-2
  60. H. Xu, H. Shang, C. Wang, Y. Du, Surface and interface engineering of noble-metal-free electrocatalysts for efficient overall water splitting. Coord. Chem. Rev. 418, 213374 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2020.213374
  61. C.-F. Li, L.-J. Xie, J.-W. Zhao, L.-F. Gu, J.-Q. Wu et al., Interfacial electronic modulation by Fe2O3/NiFe-LDHs heterostructures for efficient oxygen evolution at high current density. Appl. Catal. B 306, 121097 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121097
  62. R. Li, Y. Li, P. Yang, P. Ren, D. Wang et al., Synergistic interface engineering and structural optimization of non-noble metal telluride-nitride electrocatalysts for sustainably overall seawater electrolysis. Appl. Catal. B 318, 121834 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2022.121834
  63. L. Zhang, C. Lu, F. Ye, R. Pang, Y. Liu et al., Selenic acid etching assisted vacancy engineering for designing highly active electrocatalysts toward the oxygen evolution reaction. Adv. Mater. 33(14), 2007523 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202007523
  64. L. Zhang, C. Lu, F. Ye, Z. Wu, Y. Wang et al., Vacancies boosting strategy enabling enhanced oxygen evolution activity in a library of novel amorphous selenite electrocatalysts. Appl. Catal. B 284, 119758 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119758
  65. H. Jiang, L. Yan, S. Zhang, Y. Zhao, X. Yang et al., Electrochemical surface restructuring of phosphorus-doped carbon@MoP electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution. Nano-Micro Lett. 13(1), 215 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00737-w
  66. R. Li, H. Xu, P. Yang, D. Wang, Y. Li et al., Synergistic interfacial and doping engineering of heterostructured NiCo(OH)x-CoyW as an efficient alkaline hydrogen evolution electrocatalyst. Nano-Micro Lett. 13(1), 120 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00639-x
  67. G. Qian, J. Chen, T. Yu, J. Liu, L. Luo et al., Three-phase heterojunction nimo-based nano-needle for water splitting at industrial alkaline condition. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 20 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00744-x
  68. G. Qian, J. Chen, T. Yu, L. Luo, S. Yin, N-doped graphene-decorated NiCo alloy coupled with mesoporous NiCoMoO nano-sheet heterojunction for enhanced water electrolysis activity at high current density. Nano-Micro Lett. 13(1), 77 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00607-5
  69. Z. Wu, T. Liao, S. Wang, J.A. Mudiyanselage, A.S. Micallef et al., Conversion of catalytically inert 2d bismuth oxide nanosheets for effective electrochemical hydrogen evolution reaction catalysis via oxygen vacancy concentration modulation. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 90 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00832-6
  70. H. Wu, T. Yang, Y. Du, L. Shen, G.W. Ho, Identification of facet-governing reactivity in hematite for oxygen evolution. Adv. Mater. 30(52), 1804341 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201804341
  71. K.A. Stoerzinger, L. Qiao, M.D. Biegalski, Y. Shao-Horn, Orientation-dependent oxygen evolution activities of rutile IrO2 and RuO2. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 5(10), 1636–1641 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/jz500610u
  72. S. Wang, G. Liu, L. Wang, Crystal facet engineering of photoelectrodes for photoelectrochemical water splitting. Chem. Rev. 119(8), 5192–5247 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00584
  73. H. Hu, B. Chang, X. Sun, Q. Huo, B. Zhang et al., Intrinsic properties of macroscopically tuned gallium nitride single-crystalline facets for electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. Chem. Eur. J. 25(44), 10420–10426 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201901395
  74. M. Peng, J. Huang, Y. Zhu, H. Zhou, Z. Hu et al., Structural anisotropy determining the oxygen evolution mechanism of strongly correlated perovskite nickelate electrocatalyst. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9(11), 4262–4270 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c00596
  75. B. Owens-Baird, J.P.S. Sousa, Y. Ziouani, D.Y. Petrovykh, N.A. Zarkevich et al., Crystallographic facet selective HER catalysis: exemplified in FeP and NiP2 single crystals. Chem. Sci. 11(19), 5007–5016 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0sc00676a
  76. C. Zhang, S. Yang, D. Rao, Theoretical study the component and facet dependence of HER performance on nickel phosphides surfaces. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 47(5), 2992–3000 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.10.254
  77. L. Yang, K. Zhang, H. Chen, L. Shi, X. Liang et al., An ultrathin two-dimensional iridium-based perovskite oxide electrocatalyst with highly efficient 001 facets for acidic water oxidation. J. Energy Chem. 66, 619–627 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2021.09.016
  78. M. Risch, D.M. Morales, J. Villalobos, D. Antipin, What X-ray absorption spectroscopy can tell us about the active state of earth-abundant electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 61(50), e202211949 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.202211949
  79. C. Wu, Y. Sun, Z. Yang, J. Hu, T.-Y. Ding et al., Tuning the spin state of Co3+ by crystal facet engineering for enhancing the oxygen evolution reaction activity. Chem. Mater. 34(23), 10509–10516 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.2c02574
  80. J. Wan, D. Liu, H. Xiao, H. Rong, S. Guan et al., Facet engineering in metal organic frameworks to improve their electrochemical activity for water oxidation. Chem. Commun. 56(31), 4316–4319 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cc00700e
  81. T. Wu, M.L. Stone, M.J. Shearer, M.J. Stolt, I.A. Guzei et al., Crystallographic facet dependence of the hydrogen evolution reaction on CoPS: theory and experiments. ACS Catal. 8(2), 1143–1152 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.7b03167
  82. Y. Liang, Y. Yang, K. Xu, T. Yu, S. Yao et al., Crystal plane dependent electrocatalytic performance of NiS2 nanocrystals for hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Catal. 381, 63–69 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2019.10.038
  83. T. Maiyalagan, K.R. Chemelewski, A. Manthiram, Role of the morphology and surface planes on the catalytic activity of spinel LiMn1.5Ni0.5O4 for oxygen evolution reaction. ACS Catal. 4(2), 421–425 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/cs400981d
  84. H. Zhao, L. Yu, L. Zhang, L. Dai, F. Yao et al., Facet engineering in ultrathin two-dimensional NiFe metal-organic frameworks by coordination modulation for enhanced electrocatalytic water oxidation. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 9(32), 10892–10901 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c03385
  85. T. Odedairo, X. Yan, X. Yao, K.K. Ostrikov, Z. Zhu, Hexagonal sphericon hematite with high performance for water oxidation. Adv. Mater. 29(46), 1703792 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703792
  86. Y. Shan, X. Deng, X. Lu, C. Gao, Y. Li et al., Surface facets dependent oxygen evolution reaction of single Cu2O nanops. Chin. Chem. Lett. 33, 5158–5161 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2022.03.010
  87. S. Sun, X. Zhang, J. Cui, Q. Yang, S. Liang, High-index faceted metal oxide micro-/nanostructures: a review on their characterization, synthesis and applications. Nanoscale 11(34), 15739–15762 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9nr05107d
  88. Y. Zhang, W. Xie, J. Ma, L. Chen, C. Chen et al., Active facet determination of layered double hydroxide for oxygen evolution reaction. J. Energy Chem. 60, 127–134 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.12.038
  89. J. Noh, H. Li, O.I. Osman, S.G. Aziz, P. Winget et al., Impact of hydroxylation and hydration on the reactivity of α-Fe2O3 (0001) and (102) surfaces under environmental and electrochemical conditions. Adv. Energy Mater. 8(21), 1800545 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201800545
  90. Z. Liu, C. Yuan, F. Teng, Crystal facets-predominated oxygen evolution reaction activity of earth abundant CoMoO4 electrocatalyst. J. Alloys Compd. 781, 460–466 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jallcom.2018.12.026
  91. J. Yang, G. Ning, L. Yu, Y. Wang, C. Luan et al., Morphology controllable synthesis of PtNi concave nanocubes enclosed by high-index facets supported on porous graphene for enhanced hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 7(30), 17790–17796 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta03442k
  92. L.L. Feng, G. Yu, Y. Wu, G.D. Li, H. Li et al., High-index faceted Ni3S2 nanosheet arrays as highly active and ultrastable electrocatalysts for water splitting. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137(44), 14023–14026 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b08186
  93. C. Zhang, F. Zheng, Z. Zhang, D. Xiang, C. Cheng et al., Fabrication of hollow pompon-like Co3O4 nanostructures with rich defects and high-index facet exposure for enhanced oxygen evolution catalysis. J. Mater. Chem. A 7(15), 9059–9067 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta00330d
  94. Z. Kou, K. Xi, Z. Pu, S. Mu, Constructing carbon-cohered high-index (222) faceted tantalum carbide nanocrystals as a robust hydrogen evolution catalyst. Nano Energy 36, 374–380 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2017.04.057
  95. L. Li, C. Sun, B. Shang, Q. Li, J. Lei et al., Tailoring the facets of Ni3S2 as a bifunctional electrocatalyst for high-performance overall water-splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 7(30), 18003–18011 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta05578a
  96. R. Wei, M. Fang, G. Dong, C. Lan, L. Shu et al., High-index faceted porous Co3O4 nanosheets with oxygen vacancies for highly efficient water oxidation. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10(8), 7079–7086 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b18208
  97. J. Xiao, S. Liu, N. Tian, Z.Y. Zhou, H.X. Liu et al., Synthesis of convex hexoctahedral Pt micro/nanocrystals with high-index facets and electrochemistry-mediated shape evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135(50), 18754–18757 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja410583b
  98. B. Jiang, Y. Qiu, D. Tian, Y. Zhang, X. Song et al., Crystal facet engineering induced active tin dioxide nanocatalysts for highly stable lithium–sulfur batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 11(48), 2102995 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202102995
  99. G. Liu, J.C. Yu, G.Q. Lu, H.M. Cheng, Crystal facet engineering of semiconductor photocatalysts: motivations, advances and unique properties. Chem. Commun. 47(24), 6763–6783 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1039/c1cc10665a
  100. X. Zou, Y. Zhang, Noble metal-free hydrogen evolution catalysts for water splitting. Chem. Soc. Rev. 44(15), 5148–5180 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00448e
  101. J. Wang, H. Kong, J. Zhang, Y. Hao, Z. Shao et al., Carbon-based electrocatalysts for sustainable energy applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 116, 100717–100770 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmatsci.2020.100717
  102. B. You, S.Z. Qiao, Destabilizing alkaline water with 3d-metal (oxy)(hydr)oxides for improved hydrogen evolution. Chem. Eur. J. 27(2), 553–564 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.202002503
  103. L. Sun, Q. Luo, Z. Dai, F. Ma, Material libraries for electrocatalytic overall water splitting. Coord. Chem. Rev. 444, 214049 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214049
  104. X. Liu, P. Wang, X. Liang, Q. Zhang, Z. Wang et al., Research progress and surface/interfacial regulation methods for electrophotocatalytic hydrogen production from water splitting. Mater. Today Energy 18, 100524–100555 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtener.2020.100524
  105. J. Wei, M. Zhou, A. Long, Y. Xue, H. Liao et al., Heterostructured electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction under alkaline conditions. Nano-Micro Lett. 10(4), 75–89 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-018-0229-x
  106. Y. Xu, C. Wang, Y. Huang, J. Fu, Recent advances in electrocatalysts for neutral and large-current-density water electrolysis. Nano Energy 80, 105545 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105545
  107. D. Strmcnik, P.P. Lopes, B. Genorio, V.R. Stamenkovic, N.M. Markovic, Design principles for hydrogen evolution reaction catalyst materials. Nano Energy 29, 29–36 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.04.017
  108. S. Chandrasekaran, D. Ma, Y. Ge, L. Deng, C. Bowen et al., Electronic structure engineering on two-dimensional (2D) electrocatalytic materials for oxygen reduction, oxygen evolution, and hydrogen evolution reactions. Nano Energy 77, 105080–1050123 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105080
  109. C.G. Morales-Guio, L.A. Stern, X. Hu, Nanostructured hydrotreating catalysts for electrochemical hydrogen evolution. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43(18), 6555–6569 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60468c
  110. R. Miao, B. Dutta, S. Sahoo, J. He, W. Zhong et al., Mesoporous iron sulfide for highly efficient electrocatalytic hydrogen evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 139(39), 13604–13607 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.7b07044
  111. N.T. Suen, S.F. Hung, Q. Quan, N. Zhang, Y.J. Xu et al., Electrocatalysis for the oxygen evolution reaction: recent development and future perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 46(2), 337–365 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6cs00328a
  112. G. Fu, X. Kang, Y. Zhang, X. Yang, L. Wang et al., Coordination effect-promoted durable Ni(OH)2 for energy-saving hydrogen evolution from water/methanol co-electrocatalysis. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 200 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00940-3
  113. A. Radwan, H. Jin, D. He, S. Mu, Design engineering, synthesis protocols, and energy applications of MOF-derived electrocatalysts. Nano-Micro Lett. 13(1), 132 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00656-w
  114. J. Li, Oxygen evolution reaction in energy conversion and storage: design strategies under and beyond the energy scaling relationship. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 112–143 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00857-x
  115. N. Zhang, X. Feng, D. Rao, X. Deng, L. Cai et al., Lattice oxygen activation enabled by high-valence metal sites for enhanced water oxidation. Nat. Commun. 11(1), 4066 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-17934-7
  116. F. Chen, Z. Wu, Z. Adler, H. Wang, Stability challenges of electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction: from mechanistic understanding to reactor design. Joule 5(7), 1704–1731 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joule.2021.05.005
  117. L. Gao, X. Cui, C.D. Sewell, J. Li, Z. Lin, Recent advances in activating surface reconstruction for the high-efficiency oxygen evolution reaction. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50(15), 8428–8469 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0cs00962h
  118. N. Zhang, Y. Chai, Lattice oxygen redox chemistry in solid-state electrocatalysts for water oxidation. Energy Environ. Sci. 14(9), 4647–4671 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ee01277k
  119. Z. Chen, X. Duan, W. Wei, S. Wang, B.J. Ni, Electrocatalysts for acidic oxygen evolution reaction: achievements and perspectives. Nano Energy 78, 105392–105421 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105392
  120. D. Liu, P. Zhou, H. Bai, H. Ai, X. Du et al., Development of perovskite oxide-based electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. Small 17(43), 2101605 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202101605
  121. H. Xu, J. Yuan, G. He, H. Chen, Current and future trends for spinel-type electrocatalysts in electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction. Coord. Chem. Rev. 475, 214869 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214869
  122. H. Sun, X. Xu, Y. Song, W. Zhou, Z. Shao, Designing high-valence metal sites for electrochemical water splitting. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31(16), 2009779 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202009779
  123. L. An, C. Wei, M. Lu, H. Liu, Y. Chen et al., Recent development of oxygen evolution electrocatalysts in acidic environment. Adv. Mater. 33(20), 2006328 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202006328
  124. K. Zhang, R. Zou, Advanced transition metal-based OER electrocatalysts: current status, opportunities, and challenges. Small 17, 2100129 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202100129
  125. H. Dau, C. Limberg, T. Reier, M. Risch, S. Roggan et al., The mechanism of water oxidation: from electrolysis via homogeneous to biological catalysis. ChemCatChem 2(7), 724–761 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201000126
  126. I.C. Man, H. Su, F. Calle-Vallejo, H.A. Hansen, J.I. Martínez et al., Universality in oxygen evolution electrocatalysis on oxide surfaces. ChemCatChem 3(7), 1159–1165 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1002/cctc.201000397
  127. R. Gao, M. Deng, Q. Yan, Z. Fang, L. Li et al., Structural variations of metal oxide-based electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. Small Methods 5(12), 2100834 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202100834
  128. J. Song, C. Wei, Z.F. Huang, C. Liu, L. Zeng et al., A review on fundamentals for designing oxygen evolution electrocatalysts. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49(7), 2196–2214 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9cs00607a
  129. A. Kulkarni, S. Siahrostami, A. Patel, J.K. Norskov, Understanding catalytic activity trends in the oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Rev. 118(5), 2302–2312 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00488
  130. T. Guo, L. Li, Z. Wang, Recent development and future perspectives of amorphous transition metal-based electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2200827 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202200827
  131. H.N. Nong, T. Reier, H. Oh, M. Gliech, P. Paciok et al., A unique oxygen ligand environment facilitates water oxidation in hole-doped IrNiOx core–shell electrocatalysts. Nat. Catal. 1(11), 841–851 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-018-0153-y
  132. Y. Zhang, X. Zhu, G. Zhang, P. Shi, A. Wang, Rational catalyst design for oxygen evolution under acidic conditions: strategies toward enhanced electrocatalytic performance. J. Mater. Chem. A 9(10), 5890–5914 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta11982b
  133. Z. Lei, T. Wang, B. Zhao, W. Cai, Y. Liu et al., Recent progress in electrocatalysts for acidic water oxidation. Adv. Energy Mater. 10(23), 2000478 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202000478
  134. Y.-C. Zhang, C. Han, J. Gao, L. Pan, J. Wu et al., NiCo-based electrocatalysts for the alkaline oxygen evolution reaction: a review. ACS Catal. 11(20), 12485–12509 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c03260
  135. J. Yu, F. Yu, M. Yuen, C. Wang, Two-dimensional layered double hydroxides as a platform for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 9(15), 9389–9430 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ta11910e
  136. C. Wei, Z.J. Xu, The comprehensive understanding of 10 mA cmgeo−2 as an evaluation parameter for electrochemical water splitting. Small Methods 2(11), 1800168 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.201800168
  137. C.C. McCrory, S. Jung, I.M. Ferrer, S.M. Chatman, J.C. Peters et al., Benchmarking hydrogen evolving reaction and oxygen evolving reaction electrocatalysts for solar water splitting devices. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 137(13), 4347–4357 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja510442p
  138. F. Liu, C. Shi, X. Guo, Z. He, L. Pan et al., Rational design of better hydrogen evolution electrocatalysts for water splitting: a review. Adv. Sci. 9, 2200307 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202200307
  139. C. Wang, B. Yan, Z. Chen, B. You, T. Liao et al., Recent advances in carbon substrate supported nonprecious nanoarrays for electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 9(46), 25773–25795 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ta08039c
  140. Z.P. Wu, X.F. Lu, S.Q. Zang, X.W. Lou, Non-noble-metal-based electrocatalysts toward the oxygen evolution reaction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 30(15), 1910274 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201910274
  141. Z.Y. Yu, Y. Duan, X.Y. Feng, X. Yu, M.R. Gao et al., Clean and affordable hydrogen fuel from alkaline water splitting: past, recent progress, and future prospects. Adv. Mater. 33, 2007100 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202007100
  142. N.T. Thanh, N. Maclean, S. Mahiddine, Mechanisms of nucleation and growth of nanops in solution. Chem. Rev. 114(15), 7610–7630 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1021/cr400544s
  143. J.J.D. Yoreo, P.G. Vekilov, Principles of crystal nucleation and growth. Rev. Mineral. Geochem. 54(1), 57–93 (2003). https://doi.org/10.2113/0540057
  144. Q. Zhang, W. Li, L.P. Wen, J. Chen, Y. Xia, Controlling the shapes of silver nanocrystals with different capping agents. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 132, 8552–8553 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201000341
  145. H.G. Yang, C.H. Sun, S.Z. Qiao, J. Zou, G. Liu et al., Anatase TiO2 single crystals with a large percentage of reactive facets. Nature 453, 638–641 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06964
  146. G. Liu, H.G. Yang, X. Wang, L. Cheng, J. Pan et al., Visible light responsive nitrogen doped anatase TiO2 sheets with dominant 001 facets derived from TiN. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131(36), 12868–12869 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja903463q
  147. H.G. Yang, G. Liu, S.Z. Qiao, C.H. Sun, Y.G. Jin et al., Solvothermal synthesis and photoreactivity of anatase TiO2 nanosheets with dominant 001 facets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131(11), 4078–4083 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja808790p
  148. X. Han, Q. Kuang, M. Jin, Z. Xie, L. Zheng, Synthesis of titania nanosheets with a high percentage of exposed (001) facets and related photocatalytic properties. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 3152–3153 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja8092373
  149. D.F. Zhang, H. Zhang, L. Guo, K. Zheng, X.D. Han et al., Delicate control of crystallographic facet-oriented Cu2O nanocrystals and the correlated adsorption ability. J. Mater. Chem. 19(29), 5220–5225 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1039/b816349a
  150. J. Pal, M. Ganguly, C. Mondal, A. Roy, Y. Negishi et al., Crystal-plane-dependent etching of cuprous oxide nanops of varied shapes and their application in visible light photocatalysis. J. Phys. Chem. C 117(46), 24640–24653 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp409271r
  151. Y.H. Tsai, C.Y. Chiu, M.H. Huang, Fabrication of diverse Cu2O nanoframes through face-selective etching. J. Phys. Chem. C 117(46), 24611–24617 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/jp4088018
  152. X. Liu, G. Dong, S. Li, G. Lu, Y. Bi, Direct observation of charge separation on anatase TiO2 crystals with selectively etched 001 facets. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 138(9), 2917–2920 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1021/jacs.5b12521
  153. X. Xiao, L. Zou, H. Pang, Q. Xu, Synthesis of micro/nanoscaled metal-organic frameworks and their direct electrochemical applications. Chem. Soc. Rev. 49(1), 301–331 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7cs00614d
  154. A. Umemura, S. Diring, S. Furukawa, H. Uehara, T. Tsuruoka et al., Morphology design of porous coordination polymer crystals by coordination modulation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 133(39), 15506–15513 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja204233q
  155. S. Diring, S. Furukawa, Y. Takashima, T. Tsuruoka, S. Kitagawa, Controlled multiscale synthesis of porous coordination polymer in nano/micro regimes. Chem. Mater. 22(16), 4531–4538 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1021/cm101778g
  156. N. Sikdar, M. Bhogra, U.V. Waghmare, T.K. Maji, Oriented attachment growth of anisotropic meso/nanoscale MOFs: tunable surface area and CO2 separation. J. Mater. Chem. A 5(39), 20959–20968 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ta02896b
  157. X. Yu, J. Zhao, L.R. Zheng, Y. Tong, M. Zhang et al., Hydrogen evolution reaction in alkaline media: alpha- or beta-nickel hydroxide on the surface of platinum? ACS Energy Lett. 3(1), 237–244 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b01103
  158. J. Chen, Y. Ha, R. Wang, Y. Liu, H. Xu et al., Inner Co synergizing outer Ru supported on carbon nanotubes for efficient pH-universal hydrogen evolution catalysis. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 186 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00933-2
  159. H. Liao, D. Zherebetskyy, H. Xin, C. Czarnik, P. Ercius et al., Facet development during platinum nanocube growth. Science 345, 6199 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1253149
  160. X. Bao, Y. Gong, X. Zheng, J. Chen, S. Mao et al., Highly performed platinum nanosheets synthesized under in situ reaction conditions for hydrogen generation. J. Energy Chem. 51, 272–279 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jechem.2020.03.064
  161. H. Sun, Q. Zeng, C. Ye, Y. Zhu, F. Chen et al., Pt nanodendrites with (111) crystalline facet as an efficient, stable and pH-universal catalyst for electrochemical hydrogen production. Chin. Chem. Lett. 31(9), 2478–2482 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cclet.2020.03.032
  162. C.Y. Chan, C.H. Chang, H.Y. Tuan, Synthesis of raspberry-like antimony-platinum (SbPt) nanops as highly active electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 584, 729–737 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcis.2020.09.099
  163. T.R. Kuo, Y.C. Lee, H.L. Chou, S. M G, C.Y. Wei et al., Plasmon-enhanced hydrogen evolution on specific facet of silver nanocrystals. Chem. Mater. 31(10), 3722–3728 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemmater.9b00652
  164. D. Xu, X. Liu, H. Lv, Y. Liu, S. Zhao et al., Ultrathin palladium nanosheets with selectively controlled surface facets. Chem. Sci. 9(19), 4451–4455 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8sc00605a
  165. H. Wang, Y. Xie, H. Cao, Y. Li, L. Li et al., Flower-like nickel phosphide microballs assembled by nanoplates with exposed high-energy (0 0 1) facets: efficient electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Chemsuschem 10(24), 4899–4908 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201701647
  166. Y.H. Chung, K. Gupta, J.H. Jang, H.S. Park, I. Jang et al., Rationalization of electrocatalysis of nickel phosphide nanowires for efficient hydrogen production. Nano Energy 26, 496–503 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2016.06.002
  167. E.J. Popczun, J.R. McKone, C.G. Read, A.J. Biacchi, A.M. Wiltrout et al., Nanostructured nickel phosphide as an electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 135(25), 9267–9270 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja403440e
  168. Q. Yan, X. Chen, T. Wei, G. Wang, M. Zhu et al., Hierarchical edge-rich nickel phosphide nanosheet arrays as efficient electrocatalysts toward hydrogen evolution in both alkaline and acidic conditions. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 7(8), 7804–7811 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acssuschemeng.8b06861
  169. P. Liu, J.A. Rodriguez, Catalysts for hydrogen evolution from the [NiFe] hydrogenase to the Ni2P(001) surface: the importance of ensemble effect. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 127, 14871–14878 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0540019
  170. S. Ma, X. Qu, J. Huang, C. Zhang, G. Chen et al., Compositional and crystallographic design of Ni–Co phosphide heterointerfaced nanowires for high-rate, stable hydrogen generation at industry-relevant electrolysis current densities. Nano Energy 95, 106989–106999 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2022.106989
  171. L. Liao, C. Cheng, H. Zhou, Y. Qi, D. Li et al., Accelerating pH-universal hydrogen-evolving activity of a hierarchical hybrid of cobalt and dinickel phosphides by interfacial chemical bonds. Mater. Today Phys. 22, 100589–100597 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2021.100589
  172. X. Liu, Y. Li, Z. Cao, Z. Yin, T. Ma et al., Current progress of metal sulfides derived from metal-organic frameworks for advanced electrocatalysis: potential electrocatalysts with diverse applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 10(4), 1617–1641 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1ta09925f
  173. B. You, Y. Sun, Hierarchically porous nickel sulfide multifunctional superstructures. Adv. Energy Mater. 6(7), 1502333 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201502333
  174. W. Zhong, B. Xiao, Z. Lin, Z. Wang, L. Huang et al., RhSe2: a superior 3D electrocatalyst with multiple active facets for hydrogen evolution reaction in both acid and alkaline solutions. Adv. Mater. 33(9), 2007894 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.202007894
  175. Y. Li, Y. Wang, B. Pattengale, J. Yin, L. An et al., High-index faceted CuFeS2 nanosheets with enhanced behavior for boosting hydrogen evolution reaction. Nanoscale 9(26), 9230–9237 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c7nr03182c
  176. Q. Gao, W. Zhang, Z. Shi, L. Yang, Y. Tang, Structural design and electronic modulation of transition-metal-carbide electrocatalysts toward efficient hydrogen evolution. Adv. Mater. 31(2), 1802880 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201802880
  177. C. Yang, R. Zhao, H. Xiang, J. Wu, W. Zhong et al., Ni-activated transition metal carbides for efficient hydrogen evolution in acidic and alkaline solutions. Adv. Energy Mater. 10(37), 2002260 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202002260
  178. H. Xu, J. Wan, H. Zhang, L. Fang, L. Liu et al., A new platinum-like efficient electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution reaction at all pH: single-crystal metallic interweaved V8C7 networks. Adv. Energy Mater. 8(23), 1800575 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201800575
  179. J. Theerthagiri, S.J. Lee, A.P. Murthy, J. Madhavan, M.Y. Choi, Fundamental aspects and recent advances in transition metal nitrides as electrocatalysts for hydrogen evolution reaction: a review. Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci. 24(1), 100805–1008026 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cossms.2020.100805
  180. N. Han, P. Liu, J. Jiang, L. Ai, Z. Shao et al., Recent advances in nanostructured metal nitrides for water splitting. J. Mater. Chem. A 6(41), 19912–19933 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ta06529b
  181. M.S. Balogun, Y. Huang, W. Qiu, H. Yang, H. Ji et al., Updates on the development of nanostructured transition metal nitrides for electrochemical energy storage and water splitting. Mater. Today 20(8), 425–451 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2017.03.019
  182. M. Xiang, M. Song, Q. Zhu, Y. Yang, C. Hu et al., Inducing two-dimensional single crystal TiN arrays with exposed 1 1 1 facets by a novel chemical vapor deposition with excellent electrocatalytic activity for hydrogen evolution reaction. Chem. Eng. J. 404, 126451–126458 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.126451
  183. K.A. Adegoke, N.W. Maxakato, Porous metal oxide electrocatalytic nanomaterials for energy conversion: oxygen defects and selection techniques. Coord. Chem. Rev. 457, 214389 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2021.214389
  184. Y. Zhu, Q. Lin, Y. Zhong, H.A. Tahini, Z. Shao et al., Metal oxide-based materials as an emerging family of hydrogen evolution electrocatalysts. Energy Environ. Sci. 13(10), 3361–3392 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0ee02485f
  185. Q. Liu, Z. Chen, Z. Yan, Y. Wang, E. Wang et al., Crystal-plane-dependent activity of spinel Co3O4 towards water splitting and the oxygen reduction reaction. ChemElectroChem 5(7), 1080–1086 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/celc.201701302
  186. J. Yu, Q. He, G. Yang, W. Zhou, Z. Shao et al., Recent advances and prospective in ruthenium-based materials for electrochemical water splitting. ACS Catal. 9(11), 9973–10011 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.9b02457
  187. L. She, G. Zhao, T. Ma, J. Chen, W. Sun et al., On the durability of iridium-based electrocatalysts toward the oxygen evolution reaction under acid environment. Adv. Funct. Mater. 32(5), 2108465 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202108465
  188. K.A. Stoerzinger, O. Diaz-Morales, M. Kolb, R.R. Rao, R. Frydendal et al., Orientation-dependent oxygen evolution on RuO2 without lattice exchange. ACS Energy Lett. 2(4), 876–881 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00135
  189. R.R. Rao, M.J. Kolb, L. Giordano, A.F. Pedersen, Y. Katayama et al., Operando identification of site-dependent water oxidation activity on ruthenium dioxide single-crystal surfaces. Nat. Catal. 3(6), 516–525 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41929-020-0457-6
  190. Y. Yang, Y. Yu, J. Li, Q. Chen, Y. Du et al., Engineering ruthenium-based electrocatalysts for effective hydrogen evolution reaction. Nano-Micro Lett. 13(1), 160 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-021-00679-3
  191. F. Xue, X. Guo, B. Min, Y. Si, H. Huang et al., Unconventional high-index facet of iridium boosts oxygen evolution reaction: how the facet matters. ACS Catal. 11(13), 8239–8246 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.1c01867
  192. X.F. Zhang, J.S. Li, W.S. You, Z.M. Zhu, Ag2–O with highly exposed 111 crystal facets for efficient electrochemical oxygen evolution: activity and mechanism. Chin. J. Catal. 41(11), 1706–1714 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-2067(20)63574-4
  193. J. Wang, J. Xu, Q. Wang, Z. Liu, X. Zhang et al., NiO nanobelts with exposed 110 crystal planes as an efficient electrocatalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 24(10), 6087–6092 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cp05236e
  194. Y. Niu, Y. Yuan, Q. Zhang, F. Chang, L. Yang et al., Morphology-controlled synthesis of metal-organic frameworks derived lattice plane-altered iron oxide for efficient trifunctional electrocatalysts. Nano Energy 82, 105699–105707 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105699
  195. W. Wang, Y. Zhang, X. Huang, Y. Bi, Engineering the surface atomic structure of FeVO4 nanocrystals for use as highly active and stable electrocatalysts for oxygen evolution. J. Mater. Chem. A 7(18), 10949–10953 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c9ta02922b
  196. X. Peng, Y. Yan, X. Jin, C. Huang, W. Jin et al., Recent advance and prospectives of electrocatalysts based on transition metal selenides for efficient water splitting. Nano Energy 78, 105234–105256 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.105234
  197. F. Ye, L. Zhang, C. Lu, Z. Bao, Z. Wu et al., Realizing interfacial electron/hole redistribution and superhydrophilic surface through building heterostructural 2 nm Co0.85Se–NiSe nanograins for efficient overall water splittings. Small Methods 6(7), 2200459 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/smtd.202200459
  198. K. Dang, S. Zhang, X. Wang, W. Sun, L. Wang et al., Cobalt diselenide (001) surface with short-range Co–Co interaction triggering high-performance electrocatalytic oxygen evolution. Nano Res. 14(12), 4848–4856 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12274-021-3444-6
  199. C. Cai, Y. Mi, S. Han, Q. Wang, W. Liu et al., Engineering ordered dendrite-like nickel selenide as electrocatalyst. Electrochim. Acta 295, 92–98 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.10.083
  200. L. Lv, Z. Yang, K. Chen, C. Wang, Y. Xiong, 2D layered double hydroxides for oxygen evolution reaction: from fundamental design to application. Adv. Energy Mater. 9(17), 1803358 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.201803358
  201. G. Fan, F. Li, D.G. Evans, X. Duan, Catalytic applications of layered double hydroxides: recent advances and perspectives. Chem. Soc. Rev. 43(20), 7040–7066 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1039/c4cs00160e
  202. D. Zhou, P. Li, X. Lin, A. McKinley, Y. Kuang et al., Layered double hydroxide-based electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction: identification and tailoring of active sites, and superaerophobic nanoarray electrode assembly. Chem. Soc. Rev. 50, 8790–8817 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1039/d1cs00186h
  203. D.P. Sahoo, K.K. Das, S. Mansingh, S. Sultana, K. Parida, Recent progress in first row transition metal Layered double hydroxide (LDH) based electrocatalysts towards water splitting: a review with insights on synthesis. Coord. Chem. Rev. 469, 214666 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214666
  204. Z. Cai, X. Bu, P. Wang, J.C. Ho, J. Yang et al., Recent advances in layered double hydroxide electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction. J. Mater. Chem. A 7(10), 5069–5089 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1039/c8ta11273h
  205. L. Yang, Z. Liu, S. Zhu, L. Feng, W. Xing, Ni-based layered double hydroxide catalysts for oxygen evolution reaction. Mater. Today Phys. 16, 100292–100315 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mtphys.2020.100292
  206. N. Zhang, B. Yang, Y. He, Y. He, X. Liu et al., Serpentine Ni3Ge2O5(OH)4 nanosheets with tailored layers and size for efficient oxygen evolution reactions. Small 14(48), 1803015 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.201803015
  207. J.W. Zhao, Z.X. Shi, C.F. Li, L.F. Gu, G.R. Li, Boosting the electrocatalytic performance of NiFe layered double hydroxides for the oxygen evolution reaction by exposing the highly active edge plane (012). Chem. Sci. 12(2), 650–659 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1039/d0sc04196c
  208. F. Li, Y. Tian, S. Su, C. Wang, D.S. Li et al., Theoretical and experimental exploration of tri-metallic organic frameworks (t-MOFs) for efficient electrocatalytic oxygen evolution reaction. Appl. Catal. B 299, 120665–120674 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120665
  209. S. Jin, How to effectively utilize MOFs for electrocatalysis. ACS Energy Lett. 4(6), 1443–1445 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.9b01134
  210. W. Yang, X. Li, Y. Li, R. Zhu, H. Pang, Applications of metal-organic-framework-derived carbon materials. Adv. Mater. 31(6), 1804740 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201804740
  211. L. Jiao, Y. Wang, H.L. Jiang, Q. Xu, Metal-organic frameworks as platforms for catalytic applications. Adv. Mater. 30(37), 1703663 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.201703663
  212. L. Xiao, Z. Wang, J. Guan, 2D MOFs and their derivatives for electrocatalytic applications: recent advances and new challenges. Coord. Chem. Rev. 472, 214777 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214777
  213. J.-E. Zhou, J. Chen, Y. Peng, Y. Zheng, A. Zeb et al., Metal-organic framework-derived transition metal sulfides and their composites for alkali-ion batteries: a review. Coord. Chem. Rev. 472, 214781 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ccr.2022.214781
  214. Y. Xue, Y. Guo, Q. Zhang, Z. Xie, J. Wei et al., MOF-derived Co and Fe species loaded on N-doped carbon networks as efficient oxygen electrocatalysts for Zn-air batteries. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 162 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00890-w
  215. J. Li, J. Li, J. Ren, H. Hong, D. Liu et al., Electric-field-treated Ni/Co3O4 film as high-performance bifunctional electrocatalysts for efficient overall water splitting. Nano-Micro Lett. 14(1), 148 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-022-00889-3
  216. N.C.S. Selvam, L. Du, B.Y. Xia, P.J. Yoo, B. You, Reconstructed water oxidation electrocatalysts: the impact of surface dynamics on intrinsic activities. Adv. Funct. Mater. 31(12), 2008190 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.202008190
  217. J. Liu, W. Qiao, Z. Zhu, J. Hu, X. Xu, Chameleon-like reconstruction on redox catalysts adaptive to alkali water electrolysis. Small 18, 2202434 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202202434
  218. Y. Zeng, M. Zhao, Z. Huang, W. Zhu, J. Zheng et al., Surface reconstruction of water splitting electrocatalysts. Adv. Energy Mater. 12, 2201713 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/aenm.202201713
  219. Z. Chen, R. Zheng, M. Graś, W. Wei, G. Lota et al., Tuning electronic property and surface reconstruction of amorphous iron borides via W-P co-doping for highly efficient oxygen evolution. Appl. Catal. B. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2021.120037
  220. B. Zhou, R. Gao, J.J. Zou, H. Yang, Surface design strategy of catalysts for water electrolysis. Small 18, 2202336 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.202202336
  221. L. Liu, Z. Jiang, L. Fang, H. Xu, H. Zhang et al., Probing the crystal plane effect of Co3O4 for enhanced electrocatalytic performance toward efficient overall water splitting. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9(33), 27736–27744 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.7b07793
  222. K. Wu, D. Shen, Q. Meng, J. Wang, Octahedral Co3O4 ps with high electrochemical surface area as electrocatalyst for water splitting. Electrochim. Acta 288, 82–90 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2018.08.067
  223. L. Fang, Z. Jiang, H. Xu, L. Liu, Y. Guan et al., Crystal-plane engineering of NiCo2O4 electrocatalysts towards efficient overall water splitting. J. Catal. 357, 238–246 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2017.11.017
  224. S. Deng, K. Zhang, D. Xie, Y. Zhang, Y. Zhang et al., High-index-faceted Ni3S2 branch arrays as bifunctional electrocatalysts for efficient water splitting. Nano-Micro Lett. 11(1), 12–23 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40820-019-0242-8
  225. J. Dong, F.Q. Zhang, Y. Yang, Y.B. Zhang, H. He et al., (003)-Facet-exposed Ni3S2 nanoporous thin films on nickel foil for efficient water splitting. Appl. Catal. B 243, 693–702 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.11.003
  226. S. Chu, W. Chen, G. Chen, J. Huang, R. Zhang et al., Holey Ni-Cu phosphide nanosheets as a highly efficient and stable electrocatalyst for hydrogen evolution. Appl. Catal. B 243, 537–545 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.063
  227. C. Zhang, Y. Huang, Y. Yu, J. Zhang, S. Zhuo et al., Sub-11 nm ultrathin porous CoP nanosheets with dominant reactive {200}. facets: a high mass activity and efficient electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction. Chem. Sci. 8(4), 2769–2775 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1039/c6sc05687c
  228. H. Xu, Z. Jiang, H. Zhang, L. Liu, L. Fang et al., New efficient electrocatalyst for the hydrogen evolution reaction: erecting a V2Se9@Poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) nanosheet array with a specific active facet exposed. ACS Energy Lett. 2(5), 1099–1104 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenergylett.7b00209
  229. C.H. Kuo, I.M. Mosa, S. Thanneeru, V. Sharma, L. Zhang et al., Facet-dependent catalytic activity of MnO electrocatalysts for oxygen reduction and oxygen evolution reactions. Chem. Commun. 51(27), 5951–5954 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1039/c5cc01152c
  230. B. Chang, J. Yang, Y. Shao, L. Zhang, W. Fan et al., Bimetallic NiMoN nanowires with a preferential reactive facet: an ultraefficient bifunctional electrocatalyst for overall water splitting. Chemsuschem 11(18), 3198–3207 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/cssc.201801337
Read More
Author biographies are not available.
Download this PDF file
PDF
Statistic
Read Counter : 3816 Download : 2883

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>